Skip to main content

Dumb and Dumber To review

Dumb and Dumber To brings back your favorite morons, exactly as you left them

Whatever else there is to say about Dumb and Dumber To, there’s this: the movie lives up to its title, and then some.

Released almost exactly 20 years after its 1994 predecessor, Peter and Bobby Farrelly have re-teamed with Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels for the long-awaited reunion of infamous idiots Lloyd Christmas and Harry Dunne. (And yes, this is definitely the first time Harry and Lloyd have met since 1994. There’s definitely no such thing as a Dumb and Dumber prequel. Definitely, definitely not.) It’s the only sequel in the Farrelly catalogue, even if it’s one that’s been on the director siblings’ minds since the first film’s release two decades ago. Was it worth the wait? That depends. How dumb do you like your movies?

Was it worth the wait? That depends. How dumb do you like your movies?

Because, make no mistake: Dumb and Dumber To is dumb —almost courageously so — right from the setup. Twenty years of real-time have passed since Harry and Lloyd left Aspen. In all that time, Lloyd’s been holed up in a psychiatric facility, completely immobile, reliant on a catheter, unable to speak. His beard is like a bird’s nest, his hair almost down to his back; the bowl-cut bangs, of course, remain.

Harry has been visiting Lloyd every single Wednesday for the past thousand years. (His measurement of time, naturally.) But it’s time for him to move on. He’s suffering from a health problem — his kidneys are failing — and he’s off to seek treatment. Finally, just as Harry says his final goodbye, Lloyd stirs. Grunts that sound like words break free from his lips, slow and unformed at first, then faster, faster and faster still until it’s an unmistakable laugh-in-your-face declaration:


That’s right: Lloyd was punking Harry, willingly wasting away “the best years of [his] life” all for a gag. But what a gag! And if you think that’s moronic, just sit through Dumb and Dumber To and behold as the Farrelly brothers pull off the same prank, albeit under two hours instead of across two decades. Lloyd and Harry’s special brand of idiocy transcends the characters and permeates the entire film, as the two dimwits once again embark on a cross-country road trip, seemingly about a girl, but really about nothing at all.

Dumb and Dumber To
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Farrellys have returned to Lloyd and Harry’s world not exactly as they left it, but pretty close. Blind Billy still lives in Apartment 4C. Freida Felcher from Cranston remains a legendary figure in Harry and Lloyd’s lives, albeit more present in this one than the first film, with Kathleen Turner in the role. Some very bad people are very mad at Harry and Lloyd for messing with their plans, even though the brainless buddies have no idea about the problems they’re causing — just like last time. Of course, the Mutt Cutts van is still somewhere out there as well.

There are some new coats of paint, quite literally in the case of Rob Riggle, playing a pair of twin brothers looking to stop Harry and Lloyd from screwing up their master plans. Riggle’s a welcome addition to the Dumber world, especially as the spec ops sibling; seeing Riggle walk around in vending machine camouflage like a stone-cold Terminator does not suck.

What’s a few thousand brain cells between friends?

But by and large, Dumb and Dumber To is just like last time, all this time later. Most importantly, Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels are exactly as they were back then: dumb and getting dumber with every passing scene and increasingly bad idea. It’s pretty amazing just how well Carrey and Daniels fit back into the roles, considering the work they’ve accomplished over the past 20 years. The actors who went on to star in films and shows like Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and The Newsroom have not lost their touch when it comes to playing these morons.

And that’s the real draw of Dumb and Dumber To. Carrey and Daniels are Lloyd and Harry all over again. These characters, dormant for 20 years (again, without a prequel, because that did not happen, not no way not no how), are back in business. If you don’t like those guys, then you already know to stay away. If you do like them, then you’ll at least get some big laughs out of seeing them together again. In the end, what’s the harm in seeing Harry and Lloyd together again, even if their reunion isn’t as fun as the first party?

Put another way: What’s a few thousand brain cells between friends?

Dumb and Dumber To hits theaters this weekend.

(Media © Universal Studios)

Josh Wigler
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Josh Wigler is a freelance entertainment reporter who has been published by Comic Book Resources, Comics Alliance…
Decision to Leave review: An achingly romantic noir thriller
Tang Wei looks at Park Hae-il in Park Chan-wook's Decision to Leave.

With its lush sets and perpetually probing camera, Decision to Leave looks and moves like any other Park Chan-wook film, but it reverberates with the same untempered passion present in Golden Age noirs like In a Lonely Place and Double Indemnity. Unlike those two films, though, which center their stories around a hot-tempered screenwriter and naïve insurance salesman, respectively, Decision to Leave follows another common noir archetype: the lovelorn detective (played here by Park Hae-il).

In the film’s opening moments, Hae-jun, the detective in question, lands a case involving the mysterious death of a recreational rock climber. The case, in typical noir fashion, leads to Hae-jun crossing paths with Seo-rae (a spellbinding Tang Wei), his victim’s gorgeous but eccentric widow. Perturbed by how disinterested she is in unpacking her abusive husband’s death, Hae-jun begins to tail and spy on Seo-rae, unaware that doing so will only further intensify his attraction to her. As far as noir plots go, this is about as familiar as it gets. With its nods to Hitchcock and lightly self-aware attitude, Decision to Leave makes it clear that it doesn’t mind treading the same narrative terrain as so many of the noir classics that have come before it, either.

Read more
Operation Seawolf review: nice Nazis? No thanks!
Dolph Lundgren holds onto a pipe inside a U-Boat in a scene from Operation Seawolf.

At a time when anti-Semitic extremists are storming the U.S Capitol, running for office, and declaring war on Jewish people via social media, it might not be the best time for a movie that expects you to sympathize with Nazis. And yet, that hasn't stopped Operation Seawolf from sailing into theaters and on-demand streaming services this month.

The film, which follows the crew of a German U-boat during the waning days of World War II, casts Dolph Lundgren (Rocky IV) as German war hero Capt. Hans Kessler, who's ordered to lead the Nazis' remaining U-boats on a desperate (and likely fatal) mission to attack the U.S. on its own soil. As he and his crew make their way toward New York City in one final bid to turn the tide of war, Kessler finds himself struggling with both the internal politics of the ship and his own sense of duty as the Third Reich crumbles around him.

Read more
Conversations with A Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes review: killer’s words yield little insight
A superimposed image of Jeffrey Dahmer in Conversations with a Killer.

It’s spooky season this month, and that means the atrocity mine is currently being plundered by content creators across America. The three-episode docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes, directed by noted documentarian Joe Berlinger (Brother's Keeper, Paradise Lost), is Netflix’s second project tackling the infamous cannibal/necrophiliac/serial killer to debut in a matter of weeks. It follows Ryan Murphy’s 10-hour miniseries drama, Dahmer-Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story. This Dahmer double dose mirrors the barrage of Ted Bundy content that Netflix put out in early 2019, following up the Zac Efron-led drama Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile with the docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (also directed by Berlinger). 

As was the case with Bundy, Netflix is convinced that a multipronged examination of Dahmer could lead to a better understanding of his psychology and motivations, teaching viewers warning signs or expanding our capacity for empathy. Or maybe they recognize that people are addicted to unspeakable tragedies and will do anything they can to maximize viewers’ compulsion for true crime? Attempting to satisfy on all accounts, The Dahmer Tapes oscillates uneasily between character study, social commentary, and pure shock value, landing somewhere in between all three.
In Dahmer's own words

Read more