Skip to main content

What happened to the Ghostbusters franchise?

The original Ghostbusters stand on a rooftop together.
Columbia Pictures

2024 marks the 40th anniversary of 1984’s Ghostbusters. In the years since that landmark American comedy was released, the franchise that sprouted from it has produced four big-screen sequels, including a Paul Feig-directed reboot starring an all-female lead cast. Compared to so many of the other popular, seemingly never-ending Hollywood franchises that have emerged over the past four decades, that’s not actually that many sequels. The Ghostbusters franchise has, nonetheless, changed a lot over the years.

For a long time, the franchise’s film side lay dormant. Despite repeated attempts to get it off the ground again, it wasn’t until Feig’s 2016 reboot that any big-screen follow-up to 1989’s Ghostbusters II was released. Five years later, the reboot’s timeline was abandoned when Ghostbusters: Afterlife, a quasi-direct sequel to Ghostbusters II, hit theaters. The film, directed by Ghostbusters director Ivan Reitman’s son, Jason, relocated the franchise from New York City to Oklahoma, and that wasn’t the only major change it made.

What made the original Ghostbusters so appealing (and successful)

Trevor, Phoebe, and Podcast stand by the Ecto-1 in Ghostbusters: Afterlife.
Sony Pictures Releasing

Released over 30 years after Ghostbusters II and nearly a decade after the 2014 death of original Ghostbusters co-writer and star Harold Ramis, 2021’s Ghostbusters: Afterlife is a legacy sequel in every sense of the phrase. Not only is it a film made in the long shadow of its widely beloved, decades-old predecessors, but it’s also deeply concerned with the lasting legacy of both the original Ghostbusters and the contributions of its creators. It focuses on the descendants of Ramis’ Egon Spengler, and the actor’s real-life death is weaved into the text of the film — so much so that Reitman and company literally bring in a CGI ghost of Ramis to help save the day in Afterlife‘s climax.

The tastefulness of that creative decision is still up for debate. Beyond the lengths it goes to address the legacy of the original Ghostbusters, though, the film also roots itself in the perspective of Egon’s teenage granddaughter, Phoebe (Mckenna Grace). In doing so, Afterlife abandons the adult world of both Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II in favor of telling a coming-of-age story that, while compelling in parts, only makes the film feel that much more divorced from the franchise’s original, sarcastic sense of humor. 1984’s Ghostbusters is, after all, little more than an extremely goofy comedy about a group of middle-aged men who make a living working suitably bizarre jobs.

The film is elevated by the performances of its exceptional cast and Ivan Reitman’s incredible tonal control, but its narrative ambitions are low, to say the least. The same goes for Ghostbusters II, which is why it’s been truly jarring to see Jason Reitman and Gil Kenan take the franchise in such a different direction over the past three years. Ghostbusters: Afterlife is a family dramedy that, thanks to its sun-burnt Oklahoma aesthetic and grand instances of sci-fi spectacle, looks more like a Steven Spielberg-produced Amblin production than it does anything else. Its sequel, this year’s Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, feels closer in both tone and spirit to the franchise’s first two films, but there are still coming-of-age, family-oriented aspects that seem to exist in direct opposition to the series’ origins.

It’s time for Ghostbusters to grow up again

Slime falls into Finn Wolfhard's hand in Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire.
Jaap Buitendijk / Sony Pictures

The original Ghostbusters is an absurd supernatural sci-fi comedy about a trio of, let’s face it, doofuses who become heroes in spite of their own hang-ups and shared profound lack of self-awareness. There was and still is beauty in both its simplicity and insignificance. Forty years later, the franchise has become a lot bigger and more ambitious, and yet it feels shallower than it used to. By concerning itself so intensely with its own place in pop culture history, the series has taken on a level of narrative weight it was never designed to carry.

Based on most available metrics, it seems like longtime fans don’t mind the franchise’s recent shift in tone, aesthetic, and perspective. When you look at the differences between Ghostbusters and Afterlife and Frozen Empire, though, it’s hard not to squint your eyes at least a little. Is this what time does to all franchises? Or is the modern state of fandom so intense and loud now that no movie or TV show can run a certain length of time without becoming a metatextual commentary on its own supposed greatness?

Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire is now playing in theaters.

Topics
Alex Welch
Alex is a TV and movies writer based out of Los Angeles. In addition to Digital Trends, his work has been published by…
This unforgettable film might just be the best sci-fi movie ever made. Here’s why
Two men look fearful in Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

The most iconic image of Donald Sutherland’s career is a spoiler. To describe it would risk giving away more than the uninitiated might want to know about Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Philip Kaufman’s 1978 adaptation of the Jack Finney novel about extraterrestrial imposters out to replace humanity with emotionless doubles. But you know the image. You’ve almost certainly seen it used as a meme sometime over the last couple of decades -- or maybe the last couple of weeks, in response to the actor’s death in June. For those who have watched the movie, there’s always been some cognitive dissonance to seeing that shot transformed into internet joke currency. It is, after all, one of the most blood-curdling images in all of cinema: the look of hope shriveling away, of the future disappearing into a screaming black hole.

It’s a tad ironic that Sutherland might be best remembered for such a grotesquely outsized expression, such a monstrous moment. He was one of Hollywood’s most subtle performers, a New Hollywood legend who often underplayed what was going on inside his characters’ hearts and heads. But his work in Invasion of the Body Snatchers is richer than its final note. As Matthew Bennell, a San Francisco health inspector who slowly becomes aware of a hostile alien takeover in progress, Sutherland offers a vast range of feelings. Arrogance, good humor, fear, deep romantic longing, bottomless despair: Long before he’s literally running from the pod people, Sutherland runs the emotional gamut across this peerless sci-fi nightmare of a thriller.

Read more
Jennifer Lopez enters the war against AI in a new video for Netflix’s Atlas
Jennifer Lopez sits in an AI robot suit and stares at the screen.

Whether she's ready or not, Jennifer Lopez is entering the war to save humanity in Atlas, the upcoming sci-fi action film from Netflix.

In a new video from Netflix, Lopez's Atlas Shepherd is talking with Colonel Elias Banks (Sterling K. Brown) when a bomb explodes on their ship. During the fiery chaos, Banks places Atlas in an AI-powered robot suit. Atlas does not know how to use the suit, to which Banks says, "Let's hope you're a quick learner." Atlas' suit detaches from the ship and she's in freefalls as the preview ends.

Read more
25 years ago, The Matrix led a mini movement of sci-fi simulation thrillers
A man walks into a simulation in The Thirteenth Floor.

One way to grasp how fully our relationship to computers changed over the 1990s is to look at the cyberthrillers Hollywood made during that time. Mass surveillance, identity theft, the hacking of the soul — all the nascent technological anxieties of this new era were uploaded to movie screens like a virus. But there was no stopping what was coming, and over just 10 years, a world merely flirting with mass connectivity went irreversibly online. By the end of the decade (and, by extension, the century and millennium), the internet had become a major part of everyday life for many people. In turn, the word of warning evolved at the movies. Suddenly, computers weren’t just threatening your safety, your privacy, and your humanity. They were replacing life itself.

In the spring of 1999, the American multiplex was inundated with variations on that scary conclusion. First came The Matrix, a savvy sleeper blockbuster that used irresistible pop philosophy as the Krazy Glue of its spirited genre pastiche. Mere weeks later, eXistenZ, a weird Canadian thriller, dabbled in similar ideas, while bending them into the less mainstream shape of a drolly deranged espionage movie. And a few weeks later still, on Memorial Day weekend, we got The Thirteenth Floor, a twisty neo-noir about realities within realities that had the misfortune of opening in the wake of not just Matrix mania, but also the box-office event that was Star Wars: Episode 1—The Phantom Menace.

Read more