Skip to main content

Here’s what a neuroscientist really thinks about Elon Musk’s Neuralink

 

Elon Musk’s ambitious goals for Neuralink were put on display last week in a live demonstration, but neuroscientists are still skeptical about the company’s long-term plans to build a brain-machine interface. 

Recommended Videos

Neuralink is an implant that directly interfaces with a person’s brain, reading signals from the brain, and even altering it to fix problems. Musk said he eventually wants the device to help treat brain disorders and preserve and enhance human brains.

But Dr. John Krakauer, a neuroscience professor and director of the Brain, Learning, Animation, and Movement Lab at The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, said that we’re nowhere near close to creating Musk’s Black Mirror-like goals of controlling hormone levels and streaming music directly into people’s brains. 

Neuralink
Neuralink

“These things are premature in a way because we are so far from that, and yet we are already excited and worried about these things,” he said.

Krakauer is mostly optimistic about Neuralink’s goals, but says there are some ethical questions to be raised in putting brain chips inside people. He said scientists have to think about the long term consequences and risks of a brain chip, like inflammation or infection. 

On the other side of the spectrum, there are also ethical concerns when it comes to the cultural implications of a brain chip since Musk said the device would be quite expensive at first. 

“Is this going to be something that increases the gap between the rich and the poor, and it becomes equivalent to an incredible nose job?” Krakauer said. “We don’t want to enhance one set of humans and not the rest.”

Like many others, Krakauer watched Friday’s Neuralink presentation and said that at times, he felt that he was watching a Saturday Night Live skit rather than a groundbreaking scientific demonstration. 

Neuralink Progress Update, Summer 2020

“We are in the era of ambitious pop star-like billionaires, and we are in an age of techno-futurism,” he said. “We’ve created a situation where the very rich can run the party and try these wild and wacky things.”

However, Krakauer said he is overall excited about Neuralink and personally knows some of the scientists working on it. He said Neuralink could help with engineering and advance the technology, but its presentation so far has given off a much different tone. 

“I find it unfortunate that for every piece of real science and advancement, there has to be this massive overselling and propaganda which makes the boring, hard work of science get sidelined,” Krakauer said. 

Krakauer is also the chief medical and scientific adviser at MindMaze, a startup that develops medical-grade digital therapeutic products that assess and treat motor and cognitive brain function. MindMaze helps patients who suffer from strokes, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and similar neurological conditions with their recovery through digital neuro-rehabilitation.

What Is Neuralink
Neuralink

For Krakauer and many others, noninvasive treatments, such as animation-based immersive behavioral experiences for neural restoration and neurorehabilitation, are important to focus on. Krakauer said medical professionals don’t need to physically go into the brain to see significant results that help people. 

Krakauer said it’s important to keep in mind that people need immediate help from common disabilities. 

“A lot of patients are suffering right now, and there are really interesting things that would help them,” he said. “I’d rather we directly address patient needs right now rather than focus on something that’s more consumer-facing.”

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more