Skip to main content

U.S. tech firms continue sales to Huawei despite Trump administration ban

Despite a ban on American sales to Chinese telecom networking giant Huawei imposed by the U.S. Commerce Department, American chipmakers have continued doing business with the company, according to a report by The New York Times. Intel, Micron, and other American-based companies have quietly circumvented a ban on sales to the Chinese firm, enacted in May, and anonymous sources told the newspaper that sales totaling an estimated hundreds of millions of dollars started back up three weeks ago with components that were manufactured outside the U.S.

Whether this violates the spirit, as opposed to the letter, of the law may still be an open question, but there’s no doubt that such actions help keep the Chinese company afloat. Huawei estimates it spends $11 billion per year with U.S. technology companies.

In May, the Commerce Department put Huawei on an “entity list” but allowed American companies to continue to sell tech to the company for current products until mid-August, while placing a ban on components for future products. The move prevents companies on the entity list from buying U.S. technology and components without a waiver from the U.S. government. This threatens the survival of companies like Huawei because they rely heavily on American chips and other technology for their electronic products. Right now, it’s unclear whether or how much of the current sales will go to future products.

Huawei Google Ban Explained

Micron’s CEO Sanjay Mehrotra confirmed in an earnings call Tuesday that the company had immediately halted its business with Huawei in response to the Commerce Department’s ban, but that it resumed sales of certain products about two weeks ago after the company reviewed the entity list rules.

John Neuffer, president of the Semiconductor Industry Association, stated the following on Friday: “As we have discussed with the U.S. government, it is now clear some items may be supplied to Huawei consistent with the entity list and applicable regulations.” The law is complex, however, because even if a chipmaker provides services from the United States for troubleshooting or instruction, the company would still be banned from selling to Huawei even if the actual chip was manufactured offshore. Over time, observers believe this whole scenario could change how manufacturers approach their products and may encourage more offshore production by U.S. firms.

While the Trump administration maintains that Chinese companies like Huawei could intercept or divert information to China, Huawei denies it has done that. Meanwhile, the Commerce Department added four more Chinese companies and one Chinese institute to the banned list based on national security or foreign policy grounds. These include Chinese supercomputer maker Sugon, three microchip design subsidiaries, and the Wuxi Jiangnan Institute of Computing Technology. These are leaders in Chinese high-performance computing, some of which is used for the military. The Trump administration  is also considering adding Hikvision, a surveillance-technology company, to the banned list.

Editors' Recommendations

Jackie Dove
Contributor
Jackie is an obsessive, insomniac tech writer and editor in northern California. A wildlife advocate, cat fan, and photo app…
Huawei’s new plan may help it circumvent U.S. sanctions
Huawei logo seen on a banner at MWC.

Chinese smartphone maker Huawei, which has been badly hit by U.S.-imposed sanctions, is reportedly working on a new plan that could potentially help it circumvent those restrictions, Bloomberg reports. The plan involves the company licensing smartphone designs to some of its existing partners, which would then source parts and technology from entities that Huawei itself is barred from dealing with.

The companies that Huawei intends to work with include a little-known firm called Xnova and another company called TD Tech Ltd. Interestingly, Xnova is the subsidiary of a larger Chinese state-owned company called China National Postal and Telecommunications Appliances Co. (PTAC), which already sells Huawei’s existing Nova series devices on its own e-commerce platform. Both these companies aim to license smartphone designs from Huawei, but will most likely sell these devices under their own brand names.

Read more
iPhone 13 and Z Flip 3 keep Apple and Samsung sales strong in U.S. and Europe
Galaxy Z Flip 3 closed with Cover Screen active.

The smartphone markets in the U.S. and Europe are still suffering from a chip shortage, according to a report from Counterpoint Research, with overall sales being slightly lower in Europe and slightly higher in the U.S. than they were last year. In Europe, Samsung, Xiaomi, and Apple led the European smartphone market in Q3 (July, August, and September). Even though Samsung saw a decline from the immediately preceding quarter, the newly launched Galaxy Z Flip 3 helped its fortunes. The U.S. market remains dominated by Apple and Samsung, with Motorola continuing slow and steady growth.

Zooming out to look at the bigger picture, aside from Apple, the usual suspects who make the best Android phones (Samsung, Xiaomi, Oppo) lead the pack in the European market. This was likely with phones like the Galaxy Z Flip 3 and OnePlus 9, along with lower-priced A-Series models, while there are some surprise entrants from the likes of Vivo and Realme. Huawei continues to decline, with the lack of Google services and the limited launch of the P50 continuing to take their toll, while former sub-brand Honor is on the rise. The company just launched the Honor 50 and Honor 50 Pro as its first phones with Google services in years, and it'll be interesting to see how these affect future sales.

Read more
Ookla’s Speedtest determines the fastest 5G provider in the U.S.
T-Mobile smartphone.

Ookla's third-quarter market report and Speedtest Intelligence tests have determined that T-Mobile is the fastest 5G provider among U.S. networks across both cellular and broadband providers. Opensignal and Umlaut have also confirmed T-Mobile to be the best 5G provider in many categories.

T-Mobile managed to dominate the competition on Speedtest with little to no contest at 135.17 Mbps median 5G download speeds. In contrast, Verizon only barely scraped past AT&T with 78.94 Mbps and 72.46 Mbps, respectively. That's not all Ookla tested; it also tracked mobile and broadband speeds, dependability, and latency among the providers. You can see the breakdown below.
Mobile statistics
T-Mobile's median download speeds came out the fastest at 62.35 Mbps, while AT&T sat at 47.42 Mbps and Verizon at 39.91 Mbps. For latency, T-Mobile and Verizon tied for first with a speed of 33ms. AT&T was barely behind at 34ms.
Broadband statistics
Verizon Wireless was the winning provider with a 178.38 Speed Score -- Ookla's unique test is meant to fully encompass a provider's range of speeds. Cox came in second and Xfinity in third. Verizon also took the best latency, with only 8ms with Cox at just 11ms. While Xfinity took the highest Consistency Score at 89.8%, Spectrum and Verizon were so close behind there wasn't much difference to note.

Read more