Skip to main content

Zoom admits it complied with Chinese government to suspend activist users

Video conferencing software company Zoom has admitted that it suspended the accounts of users in the United States and Hong Kong at the request of the Chinese government, and that it intends to add the ability to block or remove meeting participants from mainland China.

Zoom last week suspended the accounts of three human rights activists, Lee Cheuk-yan, Wang Dan, and Zhou Fengsuo, who used the service to hold online discussions about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. Two of these accounts were based in Hong Kong, and one in the U.S.

Recommended Videos

The company says it suspended the accounts at the request of the Chinese government, though it’s not clear what laws were being broken by the hosts, who do not reside in mainland China.

In a blog post, Zoom said it suspended the users after “[t]he Chinese government informed us that this activity is illegal in China and demanded that Zoom terminate the meetings and host accounts,” which it admitted “have some calling into question our commitment to being a platform for an open exchange of ideas and conversations.”

Zoom has now reinstated the three users’ accounts, but it effectively denied them the opportunity to speak to other pro-democracy organizers during a crucial period. Zoom said it took this action because it does not have the ability to block meeting participants by country, so when it saw some users from mainland China were in the meetings, it had to end them.

Zoom said it is “developing technology over the next several days that will enable us to remove or block at the participant level based on geography. This will enable us to comply with requests from local authorities when they determine activity on our platform is illegal within their borders.

“Going forward Zoom will not allow requests from the Chinese government to impact anyone outside of mainland China,” the company said. But this is unlikely to be comforting to the activists within mainland China or those in Hong Kong who are looking for ways to communicate with each other or those outside the country safely.

One of the affected activists, Lee Cheuk-yan who is based in Hong Kong, expressed his dismay at the company’s actions to the Guardian. “They have restored my account but Zoom continues to kneel before the Communist party,” he said. “My purpose on opening Zoom is to reach out to mainland Chinese, breaking the censorship of the Chinese Communist party. With this policy, it defeats my original purpose.”

On Friday, more than a dozen bipartisan lawmakers, led by senators Marco Rubio and Ron Wyden, sent a letter to Zoom CEO Eric Yuan asking for further details of how many accounts, if any, the company has also closed that were located outside of the Chinese government’s authority. The lawmakers also addressed concern over if Zoom shares user data with the Chinese government. They concluded the letter by saying Zoom “must be transparent and not allow foreign governments… to dictate the terms of usage.”

Georgina Torbet
Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Apple TV+ just got a price slash that’s tough to resist, and it won’t last long
The Apple TV main screen.

Apple has just quietly announced that it will be slashing the price on its Apple TV+ offering for a limited time deal.

While Apple prices the service at a standard $9.99 per month usually, it has just cut that way down to $2.99 per month.

Read more