Skip to main content

Can’t afford a special filter to photograph the eclipse? Just use an iPhone

best solar eclipse glasses
To get an eclipse like this, you'll need a protective filter and a zoom lens, but since the eclipse is smaller from a smartphone view, no filter is necessary, Apple suggests. 123RF/IgorZhuravlov
The August 21 total solar eclipse is expected to be one of the most photographed events of the year — but  does it really require special gear? Not if you use an iPhone, Apple suggests. iPhone eclipse photography is possible filter-free according to the manufacturer, though the eclipse will be only a small portion of the image.

Viewing the solar eclipse requires wearing special glasses. The sun is too bright to stare at directly, a fact that, during the course of a normal day, your brain would remind you of when your eyeballs start burning. But since the eclipse darkens the sky, viewers don’t realize they are harming their eyes by glaring at the brightest part of the sun. Plop on a pair of special shades and viewers can stare at the eclipse from partial to totality without damaging their eyes.

The eclipse can have the same effect on a camera — fill the frame with just the eclipse and an unprotected camera, and you could wreak havoc on the camera’s digital sensor. That’s why, with the upcoming eclipse for much of the U.S., manufacturers are toting their protective solar filters.

But, in an interview with USA Today, Apple said that the iPhone doesn’t require using a special filter to photograph the eclipse. Why? Because with a wide-angle lens, the sun is too small to damage the sensor. If you use a camera with a zoom and fill the frame with the eclipse, that bright light hits over the entire sensor, but with a wide-angle camera, the small amount of light doesn’t overwhelm the sensor. Case in point — you can photograph the sun on a normal day with an iPhone without wrecking the camera, but you can’t use a zoom camera to photograph just the sun on a normal day without risking damage.

The iPhone doesn’t have some sort of special filter built-in. No filter is needed because of its wide-angle lens, at least according to Apple. That suggests that other wide-angle, small-sensor cameras like a GoPro or other smartphones could be safe, too.

If you don’t want to take Apple’s word for it, there are special solar filters available for smartphones — or as iPhone astrophotographer Andrew Symes suggests, simply placing an extra pair of solar glasses over the smartphone’s camera lens.

If you decide to shoot the solar eclipse with an iPhone, the eclipse will be about the size of this full moon. Hillary Grigonis / Digital Trends
Hillary Grigonis / Digital Trends

The filter-free capability doesn’t mean that a smartphone is the best way to photograph the eclipse. That wide-angle view means the eclipse will be a pretty small part of the image (just try to take a photo of the moon to see just how small). To actually get the eclipse to be a dominant part of the frame, photographers will want a telephoto lens (ideally 400-800mm, though a 300mm will work too, and any of these will need a protective filter). Focusing in any dark scenarios with an autofocus camera is also notoriously tough, and a tripod is recommended for the best eclipse shots.

Editors' Recommendations

Hillary K. Grigonis
Hillary never planned on becoming a photographer—and then she was handed a camera at her first writing job and she's been…
No, the Journal app on your iPhone isn’t spying on you
Apple Journal app on an iPhone 15 Pro.

If you've spent any time on Facebook, TikTok, or any other social media site over the last couple of days, there's a chance you've seen people claiming that your iPhone is spying on you — specifically, with a feature called "Journaling Suggestions."

One post I stumbled across on Facebook made it sound rather frightening, warning me that the feature shares my FULL NAME and EXACTLY where I'm located to anyone nearby. The post told me to go and toggle the setting off immediately because it was "Very scary stuff!!"

Read more
I tried the Apple Vision Pro. Here’s why it won’t replace my iPhone
Christine wearing the Apple Vision Pro demo unit.

The Apple Vision Pro is one of Apple’s most fascinating new product launches. It’s the first new product line from Apple since the Apple Watch, but the hype around it has been more like when Apple first introduced the original iPhone. Of course, Apple was not the first to the market with a VR/AR headset, but it is definitely what would be considered the most “mainstream” option out there, considering the brand name.

When Apple announced the Apple Vision Pro on June 5, 2023, during its WWDC 2023 keynote, I was excited. After years of rumors, it was finally happening. Preorders started on January 19, 2024, and the  Apple Vision Pro launched on February 2, 2024, in the U.S. The problem? It costs at least $3,500, making it a hard sell for many as a first-generation Apple product.

Read more
Don’t buy a Galaxy S24 Ultra or iPhone 15 Pro Max. Do this instead
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Mint Green color along with a Samsung notebook and a cermaic bowl with lemons.

“Do I need all that?” That’s the question on the mind of shoppers before they splurge a now-standard $1,000 asking price for a top-tier phone in 2024. Ideally, that dilemma should be there. The likes of Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Apple’s iPhone 15 Pro Max have won laurels for a handful of standout features they offer. But you might not need those standout features at all.

I’ve been on that road, and more frequently than I have the temerity to admit. For some reason, regret comes as part of the $1,200 flagship parcel. That's unless your phone is a part of your creative or work process, or you just don’t care and only want the latest and greatest for the vanity of it. A segment like that certainly exists, but that affluent user base doesn’t dictate the journey of a product.

Read more