Skip to main content

These are all of the things Facebook doesn’t want you to see

This week, Facebook made headlines when it said that a video of a beheading that had gone viral on the network would remain posted. It’s about free expression and not limited users’ rights. Now, after much pressure and criticism, Facebook has reversed that earlier stance as well as pulled the video that prompted the discussion. 

While the beheading video is now gone, discussion over what is and isn’t Facebook appropriate continues. To wit, here are some of the things that Facebook has axed in the past – and consider the fact that the network made a statement approving the aforementioned videos, while many of these went quietly into the night with nary a whisper from Facebook. 

Recommended Videos

Some of these deserved to be banished, and others will leave you scratching (or shaking) your head. 

Breastfeeding

This has perhaps become the most noteworthy example of Facebook’s photo pulling spree. Pages and profiles showing photos of breastfeeding mothers saw many of their images disappearing, and its drawn the ire of mothers and supporters everywhere

Oral sex

fb bans
Image used with permission by copyright holder

… Or at least depictions of it. A college newspaper ran the above image, referring to a story inside about HPV and its link to throat cancer. The image was the student newspaper’s Facebook profile picture, at least until Facebook yanked it.  

An unborn baby’s profile

Two Texas soon-to-be parents were so excited about the pending birth of their child that they made a Facebook account for her. They left messages like “Can’t wait to see and hold you!” … and yes, the whole thing is a little cringe-worthy. Facebook thought so too, and got rid of the fetus’ profile. To be fair, you have to be at least 13 to have an account. 

Nipples

fb bans nipples
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Actually, to be more accurate, elbows that look like nipples. This now Internet famous photo was axed after Facebook mistook those two perky elbows for something they definitely were not. 

Student on teacher abuse

Students at a school in Scotland were using Facebook to call their teachers pedophiles, as well as accuse them of other unseemly/illegal things. The page was promptly pulled. 

Two men kissing

fb bans kissThis photo was removed back in 2011, when it was used to promote an event where patrons would same sex kiss at a notoriously homophobic pub. Apparently, Facebook pulled the event – and the photo along with it. 

Alleged murderers

Earlier this year, Florida resident Derek Medina allegedly killed his wife and posted the evidence to Facebook. His profile was quickly (and rightly) pulled

Pregnancy portraits

A pregnant English woman hired a photographer to recreate the famous Demi Moore shot, and apparently Facebook didn’t approve, yanking the photo. Its reasoning was its ban on nudity. 

Mastectomy scars

fb bans mastectomy photosAfter pulling photos of breast cancer survivors going topless and bearing their mastectomy scars, Facebook reversed its decision and changed its nudity policy to allow for these images to remain up. The turnabout likely happened as a result of outrage and a petition that gained popularity, but it still shows the users can wield control in some situations. 

This particular decision also parallels the beheading case: Sometimes, Facebook changes its mind. 

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Facebook admits it didn’t actually remove Kenosha militia event
mark zuckerberg shocked

Facebook reversed its statement that it took action to take down a now-infamous Kenosha militia event that was shared shortly before a deadly shooting during protests in Wisconsin. 

An event posted by the Kenosha Guard Facebook group was taken down by the page’s moderators and not Facebook, according to a Buzzfeed report that cited internal documents from Facebook.

Read more
Facebook says Apple didn’t let it tell users about App Store tax
facebook paid event image

Facebook claims Apple made it remove a note that informed users paying for an online event on iOS about the mandatory 30% App Store tax, Reuters reports.

While announcing its new paid online events feature, Facebook committed to a zero-fee policy allowing small businesses and creators to keep 100% of the revenue they generate -- except for if the user is paying on an iOS app. There, due to Apple’s mandatory in-app purchase tax, the social network said it planned to label online event ticket purchases with a message that read: “Apple takes 30% of this purchase.” On Android, the note says: "Facebook doesn't take a fee from this purchase."

Read more
Zuckerberg slammed over coronavirus hoaxes: ‘You can’t contain deadly content’
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

 

Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) accused CEO Mark Zuckerberg of allowing coronavirus hoaxes and misinformation to spread on Facebook because it's "engaging" and "good for business" during an intense clash at Wednesday's House Judiciary Committee antitrust hearing on Big Tech.

Read more