Skip to main content

These are all of the things Facebook doesn’t want you to see

study says facebook can tell youre psychopath fb eye
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This week, Facebook made headlines when it said that a video of a beheading that had gone viral on the network would remain posted. It’s about free expression and not limited users’ rights. Now, after much pressure and criticism, Facebook has reversed that earlier stance as well as pulled the video that prompted the discussion. 

While the beheading video is now gone, discussion over what is and isn’t Facebook appropriate continues. To wit, here are some of the things that Facebook has axed in the past – and consider the fact that the network made a statement approving the aforementioned videos, while many of these went quietly into the night with nary a whisper from Facebook. 

Some of these deserved to be banished, and others will leave you scratching (or shaking) your head. 


This has perhaps become the most noteworthy example of Facebook’s photo pulling spree. Pages and profiles showing photos of breastfeeding mothers saw many of their images disappearing, and its drawn the ire of mothers and supporters everywhere

Oral sex

fb bans
Image used with permission by copyright holder

… Or at least depictions of it. A college newspaper ran the above image, referring to a story inside about HPV and its link to throat cancer. The image was the student newspaper’s Facebook profile picture, at least until Facebook yanked it.  

An unborn baby’s profile

Two Texas soon-to-be parents were so excited about the pending birth of their child that they made a Facebook account for her. They left messages like “Can’t wait to see and hold you!” … and yes, the whole thing is a little cringe-worthy. Facebook thought so too, and got rid of the fetus’ profile. To be fair, you have to be at least 13 to have an account. 


fb bans nipples
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Actually, to be more accurate, elbows that look like nipples. This now Internet famous photo was axed after Facebook mistook those two perky elbows for something they definitely were not. 

Student on teacher abuse

Students at a school in Scotland were using Facebook to call their teachers pedophiles, as well as accuse them of other unseemly/illegal things. The page was promptly pulled. 

Two men kissing

fb bans kissThis photo was removed back in 2011, when it was used to promote an event where patrons would same sex kiss at a notoriously homophobic pub. Apparently, Facebook pulled the event – and the photo along with it. 

Alleged murderers

Earlier this year, Florida resident Derek Medina allegedly killed his wife and posted the evidence to Facebook. His profile was quickly (and rightly) pulled

Pregnancy portraits

A pregnant English woman hired a photographer to recreate the famous Demi Moore shot, and apparently Facebook didn’t approve, yanking the photo. Its reasoning was its ban on nudity. 

Mastectomy scars

fb bans mastectomy photosAfter pulling photos of breast cancer survivors going topless and bearing their mastectomy scars, Facebook reversed its decision and changed its nudity policy to allow for these images to remain up. The turnabout likely happened as a result of outrage and a petition that gained popularity, but it still shows the users can wield control in some situations. 

This particular decision also parallels the beheading case: Sometimes, Facebook changes its mind. 

Editors' Recommendations

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Facebook says Apple didn’t let it tell users about App Store tax
facebook paid event image

Facebook claims Apple made it remove a note that informed users paying for an online event on iOS about the mandatory 30% App Store tax, Reuters reports.

While announcing its new paid online events feature, Facebook committed to a zero-fee policy allowing small businesses and creators to keep 100% of the revenue they generate -- except for if the user is paying on an iOS app. There, due to Apple’s mandatory in-app purchase tax, the social network said it planned to label online event ticket purchases with a message that read: “Apple takes 30% of this purchase.” On Android, the note says: "Facebook doesn't take a fee from this purchase."

Read more
Zuckerberg slammed over coronavirus hoaxes: ‘You can’t contain deadly content’
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) accused CEO Mark Zuckerberg of allowing coronavirus hoaxes and misinformation to spread on Facebook because it's "engaging" and "good for business" during an intense clash at Wednesday's House Judiciary Committee antitrust hearing on Big Tech.

"The more engagement there is, the more money you make," said Cicilline, who chairs the Judiciary Committee's antitrust subcommittee, on the topic of Facebook's incentive to leave up content that may be harmful -- like the rapid spread of coronavirus misinformation currently making waves across the social media platform.

Read more
Facebook ad boycotters to Congress: Don’t let Zuckerberg off easy
mark zuckerberg thinking

The organizers of the #StopHateforProfit Facebook ad boycott have written a letter to the House Judiciary Committee asking the members to particularly press Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about the company’s alleged monopoly over the advertising sphere.
First reported by Axios, the letter suggests several pointed questions that lawmakers could ask: For instance, what percentage of U.S. digital ad spending runs through Facebook and its subsidiaries, what this means for small and medium businesses, and whether there are any alternatives for advertisers to reach certain demographics with the power and efficiency that Facebook uses. The questions seem intended to get at whether Facebook is truly the monopoly it claims not to be.
In June, several hundred major brands, including Coca-Cola, Unilever, and Starbucks, signed on with activist groups led by Common Sense Media, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League to remove their ads from Facebook for the month of July. This was an attempt, the groups said, the put pressure on Facebook to change its policies about hate speech and misinformation.

However, Facebook has proven resilient against so many big advertisers leaving its platform. Although MarketWatch reported that its stock tanked briefly in June when the boycott was announced, total ad revenue has remained basically steady throughout the boycott, according to Forbes. The social media giant is set to publish its second-quarter earnings report on Thursday, which should show whether the boycott had any kind of major effect on Facebook's bottom line.

Read more