Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Measuring the Internet’s emotions about the ‘Breaking Bad’ finale

Add as a preferred source on Google

In a total non-surprise, Breaking Bad completely dominated everything everywhere yesterday. The terminal episode aired last night, bringing the ballad of Walter White and co. to a close. So how did the final show fair on social media? Putting it lightly, Breaking Bad took the rest of TV out back and shot it.

Social analytics team Viralheat went ahead and collected some of the more noteworthy bits of data – perhaps most crucial being the fact that Breaking Bad had 373,337 mentions on Twitter last night. But what the firm was also able to track was how we felt about it all. While clearly how we feel is that television as we know it will never be the same and maybe now is the time to cut the cable cords because what’s even the point anymore!?!?, Viralheat got a little more specific. 

Recommended Videos

#BreakingBad

As mentioned, the show itself received 373,337 mentions; 24.5 percent were positive and 59 percent were negative. This is a bit perplexing given that most everything I’ve personally heard, or seen posted to Twitter, Facebook, or (gasp!) actual review sites is heralding the finale as one of the best show wrap-ups of all time. Of course, given that we are talking about analytics technologies reading emotion, it’s incredibly possible that tweets lamenting the end of the show were interpreted as “negative,” but were no such thing.

“Viralheat thinks that the sentiment has a higher percentage of negative due to the strong (sad, upset, etc.) feelings around Breaking Bad ending,” a rep for the company tells me. For example … 

There was also a lot of blatant love.

Of course there is also this camp: 

#WalterWhite

The man, the myth, the legend himself raked in 133,158 mentions; 31 percent positive, 51 percent negative. Why the high negativity for a character that is – generally, and maybe strangely – beloved? Well, Twitter is an overwhelmingly negative place for starters; you know how you’re more likely to review something you hated to warn people than something you thought was okay, or even liked? Yeah, that applies here too. Also, with such a large number, the sentiment is bound to be more diverse. You get a lot of people talking, you’re going to also get a lot of opinions.

#JessePinkman

Aaron Paul has made us all fall in love with him as well as Jesse, even if we know he’s probably no good for us. That heart of gold shines through and we just can’t help it. Jesse Pinkman recieved 43,706 mentions, with 40 percent positive and 41 percent negative.

#SaulGoodman

Naturally, everybody’s favorite character getting a spinoff (okay, he might be the only character getting a spinoff, but with good reason) accumulated 7,248 mentions – and was the most positively tweeted-about of the bunch. Some 48.5 percent of the tweets were positive, and 36 percent were negative.

#SkylerWhite

Oh poor, long-suffering Skyler. She’s always been so strangely hated by fans and labeled a buzzkill – seriously, what a nag, right? Her husband lied about dealing meth and then completely turned their lives into a dramatic Pablo Escobar-themed telenovela. What a relentless harpy!! So of course, of her 5,951 mentions, only 34 percent were positive and a whopping 58 percent were negative.

Also worth noting is the fact that none other than Samuel L. Jackson is the biggest jerk of all time for tweeting a spoiler sans warning.

WARNING: IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE FINAL EPISODE STOP READING HERE. ALSO, IT’S SUPER WEIRD YOU READ UP TO THIS POINT; YOU SHOULD BE SITTING IN A CAVE WITH YOUR HANDS OVER YOUR EARS UNTIL YOU WATCH THE SHOW. Also, get this app. 

Now that that’s out of the way, look at what Mr. Jackson if you’re nasty posted today: 

The reactions are … passionate. Here’s one of the more reserved responses.

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more