Skip to main content

Zuckerberg goes on the offensive, blasts critics of Free Basics

facebook quickly turns on safety check following deadly bombing in nigeria mark zuckerberg  ceo at 2
Image used with permission by copyright holder
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) recently blocked Facebook’s Free Basics service in the country, citing concerns that the service might defy the country’s net neutrality laws. In response, Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has penned an opinion piece in the Times of India, attacking critics of the Free Basics program, which will extend Internet access to some of India’s poorest citizens, but will allow content to be controlled by Facebook.

Zuckerberg likens Free Basics to libraries or public hospitals, which offer a small portion of books or treatments for free, but don’t offer every book or treatment. He says that, similar to these services, Free Basics cannot offer everything, but that doesn’t mean it is a bad service.

He also claims one in every 10 people that join the Internet are lifted out of poverty, though he doesn’t cite a source for this information.

The Indian Parliament will decide the fate of Free Basics in an upcoming debate on net neutrality. Facebook pleaded for users to sign a petition a few days before the TRAI banned Free Basics, sensing danger.

The firm has since started a major advertising campaign for Free Basics and is increasing lobbying efforts in the country.

Opponents do not consider the argument put forward by Zuckerberg and his company to be worth all that much, as they continue to campaign for a Free Basics permanent ban. In his opinion piece, Zuckerberg calls opponents liars spreading false claims, and says that there isn’t a financial interest for Facebook — a claim bolstered by the fact that it doesn’t run ads on Free Basics.

However, the additional lobbying and full-page newspaper ads suggest the existence of at least a more long-term financial interest in keeping the program alive. It is not that hard to see why Facebook would want more control over access to the Internet and infrastructure — Google has similar goals in Southeast Asia.

Facebook previously changed the name of Free Basics, which was originally called, after the backlash first started in India, and it also opened the platform up to more developers. At the end of the article, Zuckerberg says that he is open to more changes, though some critics seem adamant that Free Basics needs to go.

Editors' Recommendations

David Curry
Former Digital Trends Contributor
David has been writing about technology for several years, following the latest trends and covering the largest events. He is…
Zuckerberg stands by Facebook’s policies as employees revolt, quit
Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg isn't backing down from his decision not to moderate President Donald Trump’s recent controversial Facebook messages.

In a virtual town hall meeting Tuesday, Zuckerberg said that his decision had been a “tough” one to make but said the decision process “was pretty thorough," according to the New York Times.

Read more
Zuckerberg reportedly expressed ‘disgust’ over Trump’s post on internal call
Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg reportedly told enraged employees on Friday, May 29, that the social network will re-examine policies that determine how it handles posts in which politicians discuss the use of state force.

In an internal recording of last week's meeting obtained by The Verge, Zuckerberg expressed “disgust” over Trump’s controversial post, in which he quoted a former Miami police chief who was in charge during Miami’s 1967 race riots.

Read more
Facebook employees are rebelling against Zuckerberg’s inaction over Trump
mark zuckerberg speaking in front of giant digital lock

Facebook employees typically shy away from criticizing the company publicly, but tensions within the company around the site's responsibilities have reached a boiling point.

In an unusual move, many employees have taken to Twitter to publicly criticize the way Facebook is handling debates around hate speech, freedom of expression, and the moral responsibility of platforms to moderate the content that appears on them.

Read more