Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook says white supremacists ‘cannot have a presence’ on the social network

Add as a preferred source on Google
 

Facebook removed more than 200 white supremacist organizations from its platform for violating both terrorism and hate speech community standards, a Facebook representative told Digital Trends, as part of a broader crackdown on harmful content.

Recommended Videos

“If you are a member or a leader of one of these groups, you cannot have a presence on Facebook,” Sarah Pollack, a Facebook company spokesperson, said Wednesday. The classifications of “terrorism” and “hate speech” are based on behavior, she said.

“Based on their behavior, some of the white supremacist organizations we’ve banned under our Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy were banned as terrorist organizations, the others were banned as organized hate groups.”

Previously, Facebook concentrated on ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and their affiliates, and now has expanded the definition, meaning some white supremacist groups are now included.

In addition, Pollack said, “other people cannot post content, supporting praising or representing [those groups]. This is for groups, individuals, as well as attacks that are claimed by these groups.” Pollack also said that mass shooters would fall under this category.

In total, Facebook says it removed more than 22.8 million pieces of content from Facebook and around 4.4 million posts from Instagram in the second and third quarter of 2019 for violating their community standards, according to its fourth-ever Community Standard Enforcement Report that was released Wednesday.

Facebook also said it was able to “proactively detect” more than 96% of the offensive content it took down from Facebook and more than 77% of that from Instagram.

This marked the first time Instagram was included in the Community Standards Report, as well as the first time that Facebook included data on suicide and self-injury.

“We work with experts to ensure everyone’s safety is considered,” Guy Rosen, the vice president of Facebook Integrity, said in a statement. “We remove content that depicts or encourages suicide or self-injury, including certain graphic imagery and real-time depictions that experts tell us might lead others to engage in similar behavior.”

Rosen also wrote that Facebook had “made improvements to our technology to find and remove more violating content,” including expanding data on terrorist propaganda. Facebook said they had identified a wide range of groups as terrorist organizations and had managed to proactively remove, they said, 99% of the content associated with Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and their affiliates.

In addition, they said they had expanded their efforts to proactively detect and remove 98.5% of Facebook content from “all terrorist organizations” beyond just Al-Qaeda and ISIS, and 92.2% of similar posts on Instagram.

The platform also said it removed 11.6 million posts from Facebook in Q3 of 2018 that death with child nudity and exploitation, 99% of which was detected proactively, and significantly higher than the 5.8 million posts removed in Q1 of 2018. On Instagram, they said they removed around 1.3 million posts.

On the illicit sale of drugs and firearms, Facebook also said it had greatly improved its rate of take-down from Q1 to Q3, removing a total of 5.9 million posts from Facebook and around 2.4 million from Instagram.

Maya Shwayder
I'm a multimedia journalist currently based in New England. I previously worked for DW News/Deutsche Welle as an anchor and…
Meta used AI to make your Instagram feed harder to quit
Meta says its latest AI recommendation sytems are keeping people on Instagram longer by serving up more relevant Reels and Feed posts.
Instagram open on iPhone

Caught yourself scrolling on Instagram a lot longer lately? You're not imagining it. Meta just told investors what's driving that trend, and AI is at the center of it.

During its second-quarter earnings call, Meta said time spent on Instagram grew by double digits year over year after rolling out new AI-powered recommendation systems. According to the company, the biggest gains came from improvements to how it recommends Reels and other public content, making it easier to surface videos people are more likely to watch.

Read more
Meta’s latest courtroom losses expose a potential hole in social media’s strongest defense
Plaintiffs are treating engagement features as deliberately designed products, an argument that could make Section 230 far less useful
facebook

Two jury losses have given plaintiffs momentum against Meta, but they haven’t rewritten the rules for social media. One case relied on New Mexico consumer-protection laws. The other asked a California jury whether addictive design contributed to a young woman’s mental-health issues.

The verdicts, detailed by The Wall Street Journal, reached Meta through different legal routes. Together, they suggest Section 230 becomes a less dependable shield when a lawsuit centers on choices made by the platform itself.

Read more
Meta AI is moving into your Threads DMs, where awkward AI chats belong
Because not every AI conversation deserves a spot on your followers' timeline.
Meta AI in threads DM

One of the reasons Grok AI became so popular is because it let people chat with it directly on X, resulting in some hilarious conversations. And while the public availability of Grok AI on X has resulted in numerous safety issues, there's no denying that this openness played a major role in its rise. 

It seems Meta wanted the same, which became evident when the company started testing Meta AI directly on Threads a few months ago, letting users chat with it right in their feed. But not everyone was comfortable having those conversations out in the open, so Meta has just moved its Meta AI inside your Threads’ DMs. 

Read more