Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook says white supremacists ‘cannot have a presence’ on the social network

Add as a preferred source on Google
 

Facebook removed more than 200 white supremacist organizations from its platform for violating both terrorism and hate speech community standards, a Facebook representative told Digital Trends, as part of a broader crackdown on harmful content.

Recommended Videos

“If you are a member or a leader of one of these groups, you cannot have a presence on Facebook,” Sarah Pollack, a Facebook company spokesperson, said Wednesday. The classifications of “terrorism” and “hate speech” are based on behavior, she said.

“Based on their behavior, some of the white supremacist organizations we’ve banned under our Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy were banned as terrorist organizations, the others were banned as organized hate groups.”

Previously, Facebook concentrated on ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and their affiliates, and now has expanded the definition, meaning some white supremacist groups are now included.

In addition, Pollack said, “other people cannot post content, supporting praising or representing [those groups]. This is for groups, individuals, as well as attacks that are claimed by these groups.” Pollack also said that mass shooters would fall under this category.

In total, Facebook says it removed more than 22.8 million pieces of content from Facebook and around 4.4 million posts from Instagram in the second and third quarter of 2019 for violating their community standards, according to its fourth-ever Community Standard Enforcement Report that was released Wednesday.

Facebook also said it was able to “proactively detect” more than 96% of the offensive content it took down from Facebook and more than 77% of that from Instagram.

This marked the first time Instagram was included in the Community Standards Report, as well as the first time that Facebook included data on suicide and self-injury.

“We work with experts to ensure everyone’s safety is considered,” Guy Rosen, the vice president of Facebook Integrity, said in a statement. “We remove content that depicts or encourages suicide or self-injury, including certain graphic imagery and real-time depictions that experts tell us might lead others to engage in similar behavior.”

Rosen also wrote that Facebook had “made improvements to our technology to find and remove more violating content,” including expanding data on terrorist propaganda. Facebook said they had identified a wide range of groups as terrorist organizations and had managed to proactively remove, they said, 99% of the content associated with Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and their affiliates.

In addition, they said they had expanded their efforts to proactively detect and remove 98.5% of Facebook content from “all terrorist organizations” beyond just Al-Qaeda and ISIS, and 92.2% of similar posts on Instagram.

The platform also said it removed 11.6 million posts from Facebook in Q3 of 2018 that death with child nudity and exploitation, 99% of which was detected proactively, and significantly higher than the 5.8 million posts removed in Q1 of 2018. On Instagram, they said they removed around 1.3 million posts.

On the illicit sale of drugs and firearms, Facebook also said it had greatly improved its rate of take-down from Q1 to Q3, removing a total of 5.9 million posts from Facebook and around 2.4 million from Instagram.

Maya Shwayder
I'm a multimedia journalist currently based in New England. I previously worked for DW News/Deutsche Welle as an anchor and…
Instagram scammers are holding creators’ accounts hostage with copyright strikes
Meta’s copyright system is being weaponized against the creators it’s supposed to protect
A person holding a phone with the Instagram app open on it.

Imagine waking up to find your Instagram account suspended because someone claims you stole their content. You might know that the claim is false, but appealing it could take weeks. If you're a content creator, each day offline could cost you money. Meanwhile, the person behind the complaint offers to make the problem disappear for just a few hundred dollars.

According to a new BBC investigation, Instagram creators are being hit with this new online racket. Scammers are filing bogus copyright complaints and demanding payment to withdraw them, exploiting the fact that repeated claims can put an account at risk of suspension. The account owner may still have their password and login credentials, but that does little good when their content or account has been taken offline.

Read more
Social media users in Australia might get freedom from algorithms. I want it for us all.
Big Tech may soon have to give Australians more say over what lands in their feeds.
iPhone showing social media apps

Australians might soon get to hit the off switch on the algorithm running their social media feed. According to a BBC report, draft legislation set to land this week would force platforms to hand users that choice, and honestly, I believe every country deserves this option.

Why is the government pushing this now?

Read more
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more