Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

A look at the highs and lows of a record-breaking election night on social media

Saqib Shah
By

social election night 2016 presidential trump clinton debate feat
Twitter once again proved its value as the leading source of real-time commentary and interaction during a live event on election night. But its rival Facebook found enduring success throughout the election season.

Overall, Twitter revealed that approximately 75 million tweets relating to election night were sent in just under 24 hours on Tuesday. The biggest spikes came at around midnight ET, and then at 3 a.m. ET when Donald Trump declared victory. The numbers were so great that Twitter broken its 2012 election record by 9 p.m. ET with over 35 million tweets shared.

Recommended Videos

Over 75M global Tweets were sent related to #Election2016 through 3am ET when president-elect @realDonaldTrump claimed victory pic.twitter.com/AWDBRJR4Rn

— Twitter Government (@gov) November 9, 2016

Mr. Trump’s first tweet as president-elect has now received 200,000 shares and over half a million likes.

Such a beautiful and important evening! The forgotten man and woman will never be forgotten again. We will all come together as never before

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 9, 2016

The night was filled with chatter, as celebs and general users came together to post their thoughts and reactions as the results rolled in. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, refrained from using Twitter until a few hours ago. The Democratic candidate broke her silence with a stream of tweets thanking her supporters and campaign team. Her most-shared tweet was a message of empowerment addressed toward younger women in the United States — the post has since been re-tweeted 400,000 times and received 580,000 likes. Clinton also boasts the most popular tweet of the entire election season courtesy of her “delete your account” refrain directed at her Republican rival in June.

"To all the little girls watching…never doubt that you are valuable and powerful & deserving of every chance & opportunity in the world."

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) November 9, 2016

Twitter’s election night coverage included a dedicated hashtag-activated emoji, live-stream coverage from BuzzFeed, and curated updates via Moments. Overall its traffic doubled on Tuesday, compared to a 30-percent increase for Facebook. The latter’s larger audience of 1.75 billion users ensure more interactions than its fellow social platform (Twitter currently has 316 million users).

In terms of general conversation, Facebook generated 716.3 million posts, likes, comments, and shares about the election. The social network boasted a larger roster of media providers through its Live video portal. Consequently, election-related video content drew 643 million views.

However, Facebook has trumped Twitter overall this election season. The company’s election-related push had a significant impact during the entirety of the season. This was witnessed last month when Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg revealed its voter registration drives resulted in 2 million people registering to vote.

On the other hand, there is another view emerging in the new light of a Trump presidency. This argument holds that Facebook has had an adverse affect on politics, courtesy of its algorithmic News Feed — which lacks diversity in regard to political content — creating an echo chamber of views that serve to reaffirm its users’ opinions. Add to that the fake news problem currently plaguing the site, and you have a problematic scenario. But to entertain the notion that Facebook somehow influenced the election results is frankly foolish, particularly in light of the result.

Ultimately, many Americans will be glad to see the back of a fraught election season that saw its battle lines etched across social platforms. As a recent survey by the Pew Research Center pointed out, the majority of social media users are tiring of political content and confrontation on social media. The study also revealed the divisive nature of digital platforms, with users stating their online interactions with people on the opposite side of the political spectrum left them feeling as if they had less in common than they thought.

On an optimistic note, the same study claimed social media can encourage positive engagement — eight in 10 users, for example, said social media can help people get involved with political issues that matter to them. Looking ahead, it will be up to everyone to remain engaged online (and offline) in order to bridge these divides.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Which social media platform wins?

The Pew Research Center recently released the results of its latest survey on the use of the internet and social media among Americans -- and the results reveal a healthy generation gap.

Facebook and YouTube remain the leaders in terms of social media consumption. Pew reports that 68 percent of all Americans use Facebook, and three-quarters of those users access the site on a daily basis. Among those under the age of 65, Facebook appears to be a fairly universal platform, with a wide range of demographics represented on the site.

Read more
Governments are stepping in to regulate social media, but there may be a better way
social media moderation holding phone

Maskot/Getty Images

Criticism for hate speech, extremism, fake news and other content that violates community standards has the largest social media networks strengthening policies, adding staff, and re-working algorithms. In the Social (Net)Work Series, we explore social media moderation, looking at what works and what doesn’t, while examining possibilities for improvement.

Read more
Are you #stoked or #overit? The complete guide to hashtags on social media
what is a hashtag wtf interne jcpenny

If you’re new to the world of social media, you may not know exactly what a hashtag is or what you can do with one. Who can create hashtags? What are they used for? And how have these seemingly random combinations of letters and numbers changed how we navigate social media? #dontpanic. This is your guide to #hashtags.
So what is a hashtag?
A hashtag is a word or phrase that follows a pound sign (also known as a hash) and is used to identify specific posts on social media. A type of metadata, hashtags allow anyone to tag content on sites like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Hashtags help users more easily navigate posts and engage in larger online conversations.

Hashtags are user-generated, not created by social media sites. While companies can make and sponsor their own hashtags, the tags themselves are not owned by any one company -- and anyone with access to the internet can create one. Public opinion and engagement are responsible for what become popular hashtags and what content gets tagged. Sometimes this mean the intended meaning of a hashtag is lost (as in the case of #McDStories), but at their core, hashtags are all about generating buzz and encouraging conversation.
A brief history of hashtags
Hashtags as we know them have only existed for a few years. While hashes were used in Internet Relay Chat (IRC) in the '90s to categorize items, they've taken off recently. The word "hashtag" was even added to the Oxford English Dictionary in 2014 to recognize the tag's widespread use.

Read more