Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Entertainment
  3. Opinion
  4. Features

5 things we miss about TV that the Internet totally ruined

Add as a preferred source on Google

I remember trying to make a date with a friend of a friend many years ago, when I first moved to Los Angeles. We were talking on the phone, about to set a time for our date, when suddenly she had to hang up. The emergency? It was Thursday at 8 p.m. and The Apprentice was starting.

Our options for not just what to watch, but also how to watch them, have exploded.

This was in the pre-DVR era. TiVos were around, but not common. VCRs were common, but limited in their functionality. To kids today, it must be pretty hard to believe that people used to plan their lives around television schedules.

Technology has changed all that. We no longer held captive by certain nights of television (well, except maybe Sundays). As mass media shifts from broadcast signals to Wi-Fi signals, we also no longer have to fiddle with rabbit ears or sit through commercials. Our options for not just what to watch, but also how to watch them, have exploded.

But technological progress frequently comes with costs that aren’t always visible. Here are some great aspects of the “old way” of broadcasting television that are on the verge of disappearing forever:

Predictable TV schedules

An upside of having TV schedules so rigidly connected to the calendar: You always knew when your favorite TV shows would return with new seasons, give or take a couple weeks. That’s rarely the case these days. I blame The Sopranos for this, when nearly two years passed seasons five and six. (I also blame The Sopranos for popularizing the annoying habit of shows splitting their seasons into mini-seasons, with super-long gaps between new episodes.)

The Sopranos
The Sopranos
The Sopranos

Streaming services aren’t helping the cause either. Waiting to release all episodes at once adds months to release dates.

Casual viewership

In the pre-DVR age, watching every episode of a series used to be a task accomplishable only by a hardened few. Miss an episode? That’s OK, so did most everyone. Back when it was common for TV shows to attract 20-plus million viewers per week, the vast majority of those viewers hadn’t seen the episode prior.

As the audience for individual TV shows – rather than entire series — has shrunken, the focus has shifted towards engaging those show’s core audiences. As a super-fan of a TV show you might be thinking: “Great! They’re tailoring this show just for me!”

But there’s a catch — casual viewers used to be able to keep shows afloat longer due to their sheer numbers. So that niche show you absolutely adore? Don’t expect it to stick around for seven seasons.

True water-cooler moments

Water-cooler chatter at work has gone from “I can’t believe that Monica and Chandler hooked up!” to “Don’t say anything, I haven’t seen it yet!”

Twitter has replaced the water cooler for those still brave enough to watch TV live, but true water-cooler moments are mostly extinct. Buzzed-about TV moments like Game of Thrones’s Red wedding or Lost’s first flash-forward can still get people talking, but they’re no “Who shot J.R.?” Heck, they aren’t even “Who shot Mr. Burns?”

Dallas
Dallas
Dallas

Nowadays, when Saturday Night Live or Funny or Die parodies a moment in pop culture that “everybody is talking about”, they’re doing it less for people who actually saw the original moment, and more for people who just heard about it. 

Accuracy in news 

Yes, television journalists are still held accountable for misstatements of fact, just ask Brian Williams. But the 24-hour news cycle – not to mention competition with digital and social media – has given immediacy the edge over accuracy. A big edge. News producers have too much time to fill, with too many competitors willing to run stories that haven’t been fully vetted. News operations can’t afford to be as cautious as they once were.

Free TV

All TV used to be completely free, simple as that. Advertisers paid for content that anyone could see — content they wanted as many people to see as possible. That model is dying. Ad-supported TV still exists, but it’s filtered through cable systems, Internet providers, and streaming services. TV you have to pay for is no longer a supplement to the broadcast model, it’s replaced it.

Twin Peaks
Twin Peaks
Twin Peaks

I know what you’re saying: “Yes, Eric, all that is true – but look at how much better, quality-wise, TV has gotten!” To that, I’d point out that the old model had no problem producing shows like The West Wing, ER, NYPD Blue, Seinfeld, and Twin Peaks — shows from the ‘90s that still hold up very well today. Hey, maybe that’s why we’re seeing all these ‘90s reboots.

Eric Buchman
Former Contributor
Eric is a TV Writer whose credits include ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy and Lifetime’s Drop Dead Diva. When not working on a…
EXCLUSIVE: Obsession composer Rock Burwell breaks down the horror hit’s unsettling score
Composer Rock Burwell talks creating the Obsession's beloved score, the film's Oscar campaign, and collaborating with director Curry Barker
Nikki (Inde Navarette) and Bear (Michael Johnston) sitting on a bed together in the horror film, Obsession, written and directed by Curry Barker.

Horror fans can't stop talking about Obsession, and Rock Burwell's haunting musical score has been one of the most celebrated elements of the movie. Made on a reported $750,000 budget with many emerging actors and crew members, Obsession has grossed over $300 million at the box office.

The film's extraordinary turnout has made it one of the highest-grossing horror movies of all time. Director Curry Barker has even told The Hollywood Reporter that Focus Features plans to launch an Oscars campaign for Obsession, making Burwell's score a possible awards contender.

Read more
Google is diving into the film world with millions of dollars, and yes, AI is involved
Google makes its first-ever stake in a movie studio.
Chiwetel Ejiofor looking astonished in Backrooms, the horror film directed by Kane Parsons and produced by A24.

Google is investing roughly $75 million in A24, the studio behind the latest hits like Backrooms and Obsession, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The investment comes attached to a new AI research partnership between A24 and Google DeepMind, Google's artificial intelligence research lab.

Read more
Amazon pulls back from Sam Altman film ‘Artificial’ as it may have hit too close to home
Amazon MGM Studios walked away despite strong test screenings and a finished cut
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman during the Uncapped podcast in June 2025.

Amazon MGM Studios just backed out of releasing Artificial, Luca Guadagnino's movie about OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

According to Deadline, the studio confirmed it will no longer distribute the nearly finished film, even though it had been in the works for roughly a year and had already screened well in early test audiences.

Read more