Skip to main content

There could be 300 million potentially habitable planets in our galaxy

When we look up at the night sky, we see thousands of stars, which is just a tiny fraction of the billions of stars in our galaxy. And we can imagine that many of these stars could host exoplanets, meaning that the number of potential planets out there is enormous. But how many of these planets might be habitable? A new study has come up with an estimate.

Researchers from NASA, the SETI Institute, and others, found that there may be as many as 300 million potentially habitable planets in our galaxy alone. And some of these might even be close by, within 30 light-years of our sun.

To come up with the estimate, researchers used data from both the Kepler Space Telescope and the Gaia space observatory to build up a picture of the stars and exoplanets in our galaxy. Previous estimates of the number of habitable worlds were based on how far planets were from their star, but the new figure also takes into account factors like how much light a planet receives, which is relevant to whether it could have liquid water on its surface.

This illustration depicts Kepler-186f, the first validated Earth-size planet to orbit a distant star in the habitable zone.
This illustration depicts Kepler-186f, the first validated Earth-size planet to orbit a distant star in the habitable zone. NASA Ames/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle

This information can help point exoplanet-hunting tools like NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) in the right direction. “Knowing how common different kinds of planets are is extremely valuable for the design of upcoming exoplanet-finding missions,” said co-author Michelle Kunimoto, who works on the TESS team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Surveys aimed at small, potentially habitable planets around Sun-like stars will depend on results like these to maximize their chance of success.”

Future research will need to focus on whether exoplanets have an atmosphere and what it is composed of, which is another key component of habitability. This is hard to assess with current instruments, but next-generation telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope will be able to investigate exoplanet atmospheres more closely.

For now, the estimate of potentially habitable planets has implications on the biggest of questions — whether we are alone in the universe. “This is the first time that all of the pieces have been put together to provide a reliable measurement of the number of potentially habitable planets in the galaxy,” said co-author Jeff Coughlin, an exoplanet researcher at the SETI Institute and Director of Kepler’s Science Office. “This is a key term of the Drake Equation, used to estimate the number of communicable civilizations — we’re one step closer on the long road to finding out if we’re alone in the cosmos.”

Editors' Recommendations

Georgina Torbet
Georgina is the Digital Trends space writer, covering human space exploration, planetary science, and cosmology. She…
Hubble images our ghostly neighborhood galaxy NGC 6684
The lenticular galaxy NGC 6684 bathes this image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope in a pale light. Captured with Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys, this galaxy is around 44 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Pavo. Pavo – the Latin name for peacock – is a constellation in the southern sky and one of four constellations collectively known as the Southern Birds.

Scientists working with the Hubble Space Telescope release an image each week that the telescope has taken recently, and this week's image shows a lenticular galaxy located 44 million light-years away. Known as NGC 6684, this galaxy in the constellation of Pavo, which can be seen from the Southern Hemisphere.

Lenticular galaxies are different from spiral galaxies such as our Milky Way. Instead of distinct spiral arms reaching out from a center, lenticular galaxies are more amorphous and diffuse, but with a central disk. This type of galaxy is halfway between a spiral galaxy and an elliptical galaxy, which is smooth and almost featureless. Lenticular galaxies don't have much interstellar matter, or dust and gas floating between stars, so there isn't much material for the creation of new stars and the rate of star formation within these galaxies is low. The lack of structure in this type of galaxy is emphasized by its absence of dust lanes, making it look even more "ghostly," as Hubble scientists dub it.

Read more
Webb spots water vapor in a planet-forming disk
An artist's concept portraying the star PDS 70 and its inner protoplanetary disk.

One of the big open questions about Earth and how life formed here is where the planet's water came from. Water is essential to life as we know it, but many scientists think that water did not originally form on Earth -- rather, it may have been carried here by asteroids. Recently, though, astronomers have discovered water vapor in the planet-forming region of a star, suggesting that future planets which form here might have access to water right from the start.

The study used the James Webb Space Telescope to look at star PDS 70, which is cooler and much younger than our sun. The star has two gas giant planets orbiting it, but it is also still forming planets and has two protoplanetary disks of dust and gas swirling around it. The inner disk, which is in a region comparable to the distance of the Earth from the sun, is where the water vapor was detected.

Read more
Here’s why scientists think life may have thrived on the ‘hell planet’ Venus
The planet Venus.

When you look at Venus today, it doesn’t seem like a very welcoming place. With surface temperatures hotter than an oven, atmospheric pressure equivalent to being 3,000 feet deep in the ocean, and no liquid water anywhere that we’ve seen, it seems like the opposite of a comfortable environment in which life could emerge.

But in the last decade, scientists have begun to wonder whether this “hell planet” could once have been habitable. Billions of years ago, Venus could have been a cooler, wetter place, with oceans not unlike our own here on Earth.

Read more