Skip to main content

Reuters: Fisker lost $35,000 on each Karma plug-in hybrid it built

fisker karma motionThe Fisker Karma plug-in hybrid sedan sounded like a dream car. It was supposed to posses the performance, luxury, and style of the world’s finest automobiles, and the economy of its most frugal.

The dream seems to be over. The Karma has been plagued with problems, and so is the company that made it. Having shut down production months ago, Fisker laid off most of its employees and is currently seeking a buyer. Company founder and namesake Henrik Fisker jumped ship in March after a dispute with Fisker Automotive’s Board of Directors.

That sounds pretty bad, but a new report by Reuters shows that things were much worse behind the doors of Fisker’s California headquarters. Delving through the company’s records, Reuters found that Fisker lost at least $35,000 on each of the 2,450 Karmas it built from 2011 to 2012.

Speaking anonymously, a former Fisker executive said the Karma “cost far more to produce than we could ever charge for it.”

That high price was the result of a convoluted development process. In addition to overcoming the obvious complexities of the Karma’s plug-in powertrain, engineers also had to take pains to preserve Henrik Fisker’s original design.

When it became apparent that the Karma’s unorthodox forward-mounted exhaust was hurting power and making too much noise, engineers encased it in a steel box called the “Pizza Box,” which added millions of dollars in development costs.

The need for unusual fixes like this meant Fisker had to ask suppliers to hand build parts, increasing the price of individual components as much as threefold.

Consequently, Fisker was often cash strapped. After the company failed to meet development milestones, the U.S. Department of Energy stopped payments on its $529 million loan to Fisker, a fact that was kept secret from investors for months. The company only saw $192 million of the DOE loan.

No story about a failed company would be complete without some capitalistic excess, and Fisker is no exception. Even as cash dried up and employees were laid off, Henrik Fisker and partner Barny Koehler continued to draw salaries of $600,000 to $700,000 each.

Fisker also threw a pre-race party onboard a 146-foot yacht for the 2011 Monaco Grand Prix. “Guests drank glasses of champagne served with flecks of gold,” the Reuters report said.

The event cost between $80,000 and $100,000 which “wasn’t lavish by auto-marketing standards, but by this point every penny mattered. Within weeks, the Energy Department stopped payments on its loan.”

Fisker is estimated to have lost $1.4 billion total. With a buyer nowhere in sight, the Karma is officially an orphaned car.

Editors' Recommendations

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Mercedes-AMG GT 73 plug-in hybrid will unleash 805 hp, report says
2019 Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe

The Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door is already pretty fast, but Mercedes may be planning an even faster version. Autocar reports that the GT 4-Door will get a plug-in hybrid powertrain anchored by a twin-turbocharged V8 that makes an impressive 805 horsepower. The British magazine published purported spy photos of this car, expected to be dubbed Mercedes-AMG GT 73 4Matic, undergoing testing. AMG may have other high-performance plug-in hybrids in the pipeline as well.

The plug-in hybrid powertrain could be a production version of the one used in the original GT concept from the 2017 Geneva Motor Show, according to Autocar. That car married a plug-in hybrid system with the 4.0-liter twin-turbocharged V8 used in numerous current Mercedes-AMG models. It also had all-wheel drive (4Matic, in Mercedes speak) so the production version will likely have that, too. Autocar predicts an electric-only range of 31 miles, although that's likely based on the European WLTP testing cycle, not the U.S. EPA cycle.

Read more
Rivian R2 vs. Kia EV9: battle of affordable electric SUVs
Kia EV9 GT-Line Three Quarters

The long-awaited Rivian R2 has finally been announced, and it's an excellent option for those who want an electric SUV that doesn't completely break the bank. Sure, the R2 isn't cheap -- but it's a whole lot cheaper than most other EVs out there, especially when it comes to SUVs. But Rivian isn't the only company trying to tackle the problem of the budget electric SUV. The Kia EV9 is finally available, and it too offers a modern design and a range of helpful features.

Given the fact that the Rivian R2 and Kia EV9 are two electric SUVs in a similar price range, you might be wondering which is better for your needs. That's why we put the Rivian R2 and the Kia EV9 head-to-head.
Design
Both the Rivian R2 and the Kia EV9 are actual SUVs -- not crossovers pretending to be SUVs, like plenty of other EVs out there. The two vehicles offer big, boxy designs and plenty of interior space, making them excellent options for families or those who need that extra storage.

Read more
Rivian R2 vs R1S: How will Rivian’s cheaper SUV compare?
The front three-quarter view of a 2022 Rivian against a rocky backdrop.

Rivian has finally unveiled the R2, its long-awaited attempt at a more affordable electric SUV. The new vehicle may not be available just yet, but fans of Rivian's design aesthetics and feature set are already looking forward to being able to order the new car. The R2 is targeted at being a more affordable take on the electric SUV and will sit alongside the flagship-tier R1S.

Let's get this out of the way right now: The R1S is most likely going to be a better vehicle than the R2. Rivian isn't replacing the R1S with the R2 — it's releasing the R2 as a more affordable alternative, and there will be some compromises when buying the R2 over the R1S.

Read more