Skip to main content

Tesla sudden accelerations caused by driver error, NHTSA concludes

Tesla vehicles do not have a design flaw that can cause sudden unintended acceleration (SUA), according to the results of a yearlong review by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

The investigation — launched by the agency after it received a petition with 232 complaints about the alleged fault, 203 of them involving crashes — concluded that the incidents were caused by the driver hitting the wrong pedal.

The NHTSA took a close look at all of the complaints listed in the petition, and also analyzed available crash data from sources such as the vehicle’s Event Data Recorder, log data, and/or video data.

After reviewing all of the evidence, the NHTSA concluded that “SUA crashes in the complaints cited by the petitioner have been caused by pedal misapplication.”

It added: “There is no evidence of any fault in the accelerator pedal assemblies, motor control systems, or brake systems that has contributed to any of the cited incidents. There is no evidence of a design factor contributing to increased likelihood of pedal misapplication. The theory provided of a potential electronic cause of SUA in the subject vehicles is based upon inaccurate assumptions about system design and log data.”

There was much speculation at the time about what could be causing the accidents with the Model X, S, and 3 vehicles, though Tesla was quick to dismiss claims of a fault, insisting in January 2020 that “there is no ‘unintended acceleration’” in its vehicles,” and describing the petition as “completely false.”

Tesla said at the that time that it’s always transparent with the NHTSA, and that over recent years, it’s discussed “the majority of the complaints alleged in the petition” with the agency, and that in every case where it had the vehicle’s data, it was able to confirm that the car operated as designed. “In other words, the car accelerates if, and only if, the driver told it to do so, and it slows or stops when the driver applies the brake,” the automaker said.

Tesla said it was its own belief that the petition was brought by a short-seller (who is able to profit when the price of a company’s stock drops).

The investigation’s conclusion will come as welcome news for Tesla, which has been waiting a considerable amount of time to move on from the issue.

Digital Trends has reached out to Tesla for comment on the NHTSA’s findings and we will update this article when we hear back.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
How to watch Tesla’s Cybertruck delivery event today
Tesla's Cybertruck.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck. Tesla

It’s been a long time coming, but Tesla is about to deliver the Cybertruck to its first customers.

Read more
Tesla introduces ‘congestion fee’ for Supercharger stations
Tesla Supercharger

Tesla has been charging an idle fee for years in a bid to free up its Superchargers and prevent traffic jams at charging stations. But now it’s introducing a new congestion fee, which in some places will replace the idle fee.

To recap, idle fees kick in when a Supercharger station is at 50% capacity. It means that if a car is left plugged in after it is fully charged, the owner has to pay 50 cents a minute until they leave. If the station is 100% occupied, the fee doubles to $1 a minute.

Read more
Cybertruck goes on public display ahead of next week’s launch
Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck. Tesla

We’re just a week away from Tesla delivering the first Cybertrucks to customers, and the automaker has started to put the vehicle on public display ahead of the launch.

Read more