Skip to main content

Here’s how two of the best budget CPUs stack up against each other

Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

If you’re buying or building a new computer in 2024, your two main CPU choices are AMD’s Ryzen 7000 series or Intel’s 13th and 14th generations. Two of the best budget CPUs from those two lines are the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Intel’s Core i5-14400. Both are built on the latest processes and architectures from each company, and come with plenty of cores and high clock speeds. They’re also far more power efficient than the top chips.

To help you decide which is the best CPU for you, let’s take a look at how the 7600 and 14400.

Recommended Videos

Pricing and availability

The AMD Ryzen 7600 was initially launched in January 2023 alongside the other non-X CPUs from its generation. It debuted with a price tag of $229, which it has mostly maintained to this day. However, the higher-end 7600X has come down in price and can often be found for a comparable investment, so it’s always worth checking that price before buying a 7600.

Intel Core i5-14400 packaging.
Intel

The Intel Core i5-14400 launched in January 2024, alongside the other non-K variants of the 14th generation with a recommended retail price of $221. Most retailers at the time of writing have it listed at $270, though many are discounting it to $240. The 14400F is available at a slight discount — typically closer to $210 — but it doesn’t have onboard graphics.

Both the 7600 and 14400 are widely available at a range of retailers.

Specs

AMD Ryzen 5 7600 Intel Core i5-14400
Cores/threads 6/12 6P+4E/16
Base clock 3.8GHz 2.5GHz
Boost clock 5.1GHz 5GHz
L2+L3 cache 38MB 29.5MB
TDP 65W 65W/148W
Price $230 $240

Since these chips are from two different manufacturers with different design ideas, their specs are quite distinct. The Ryzen 7600 uses a traditional single-core architecture, Zen 4, for all six of its cores, with 12-thread support thanks to simultaneous multithreading. The Intel CPU, on the other hand, has six performance cores, with an additional four efficiency cores, giving it a total of 10, plus a thread support of 16. That may give it a leg up in some multi-threaded scenarios, but is unlikely to have much impact in gaming, where the E cores are rarely utilized.

Clock speeds are pretty comparable at boost, but it’s notable that the Intel CPU’s base clock is far lower. Cache is higher on the AMD CPU, while maintaining a significantly lower TDP. That AMD CPU will use more power than that when boosting, but it is unlikely to break 90 watts.

Performance

The performance numbers for Intel’s Core i5 14400 are quite limited at the time of writing, as it’s a relatively new chip and not one of the iconic K-series CPUs that draw all the limelight that comes with a new generation of Intel CPUs. Still, we do have some tentative results, and though they’re not exactly bad, they aren’t that impressive, either.

HWCooling found it put up Cinebench R23 single- and multi-threaded scores of 1,772 and 15,848, respectively. The Ryzen 5 7600 managed 1,833 and 14,639, respectively. That’s about what we’d expect the disparity to be, considering the additional cores in the 14400 giving it a leg up in multi-threading. The 14400 was around 10% faster in productivity applications like Blender, but in all cases was only a few percent better than the last-generation 13400.

The Ryzen 5 7600X sitting among thermal paste and RAM.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

In gaming, however, the 7600 really seems to storm ahead. In Counter-strike: Global Offensive it managed over 653 frames per second (fps) in HWCooling’s testing, where the 14400 managed just 442 fps. That’s also actually less than the 13400 managed, with 446 fps. In a more demanding, modern game like Total War Saga: Troy, the, Core i5 14400 managed a 199 fps average at 1080p, where the 7600 achieved a more-impressive 229 fps

We’ll add more results here from a wider array of sources when we have them, but it seems fair to say that in heavy multi-threaded workloads, the 14400 has an advantage, but in single-threaded and gaming scenarios, the Ryzen 5 7600 holds a slight lead, and even the last-generation 13400 is relatively competitive with its newer counterpart.

How’s the upgrade path?

Whenever you buy a new processor or build a new PC, it’s always important to consider what you might upgrade it with in the future. That’s not to say you should always be looking to the next thing, but upgradability is a factor in any PC build, so making sure yours has somewhere to go without needing a huge overhaul is a wise move.

In the case of the Ryzen 5 7600, the world is your oyster. With this CPU, you’re sitting at the basement of a new socket generation (AM5), which AMD has pledged to support for several more generations from now. That means not only do you have the entire Ryzen 7000 range to upgrade to — including the excellent 7800X3D gaming CPU — but anything from the next few generations that comes along. You probably won’t even have to upgrade your motherboard beyond a BIOS update, and your DDR5 memory should be good for years to come.

Intel Core i5-14600K processor inside its socket.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The Core i5-14400 is a different story. Intel is switching to a new socket design for its 15th generation, so you can only upgrade this chip to higher-end 14000-series processor. While the 14600K and higher-end models will give a big bump in performance, they are not very efficient and will quickly fall behind future generations of CPUs from either camp. Zen 5 and Arrow Lake are already looking very impressive.

If you buy the 14400, plan to grab a 14600K at some point in the future, but the higher-end options are a hard sell unless you get them at a steep discount.

14400 vs 7600: Which CPU is the best?

The Core i5-14400 might be the best Intel CPU of its generation in terms of its bang-for-the-buck performance, but when it’s sitting alongside power-hungry hogs like the 14900K and 14700K, that’s not saying much. It still draws way too much power, isn’t that much better than the last-generation 13400, and has very little in the way of upgrade prospects.

It is the faster CPU in terms of productivity, though, so if you plan to work and play with your PC, then a Core i5 14400 might be worth your while. However, everywhere else,the Ryzen 5 7600 holds a real advantage. It’s comparably priced, offers competitive performance in multi-threaded workloads, and storms ahead in most games, with a significant lead in frame rate — which at this price is even more important.

It’s also more power efficient, and has all the upgrade potential in the world. If you’re looking to play games with your new PC, it’s the better CPU — especially since you can buy the Ryzen 5 7600X for a similar cost, and that chip is a little bit quicker, as our testing showed.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
I tested the Ryzen 5 9600X against the best budget gaming CPU — here’s the winner
The Ryzen 5 7600X sitting among thermal paste and RAM.

AMD is back with a new budget CPU that's aiming to make it among the best gaming processors. The Ryzen 5 9600X debuts the Zen 5 architecture, and it comes with some performance improvements over last-gen's Ryzen 5 7600X. As you can read in our Ryzen 5 9600X review, however, it's not a slam dunk for AMD's latest.

Big price drops on AMD's last-gen Ryzen 5 7600X have made it a very impressive budget CPU. Although the latest Ryzen 5 9600X is clearly faster across benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 7600X stands out with an exceptional value.
By the specs

Read more
AMD didn’t even need its best CPU to beat Intel
A render of a Ryzen 9000 CPU.

Looks like the competition between AMD and Intel is about to start heating up again. AMD's upcoming second-best processor, the Ryzen 9 9900X, was just spotted in an early benchmark -- and the results are shockingly good. If this is what AMD can do with a 12-core CPU, what's going to happen when the 16-core version of Zen 5 appears in tests?

The happy news (for AMD fans, at least) comes directly from the Geekbench 6.2 database, and it all comes down to a benchmark of what appears to be a retail sample of the Ryzen 9 9900X. The chip scored an impressive 3,401 points in the single-core score, and 19,756 points in the multi-core score. That puts it far above its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7900X, but that's not its only success.

Read more
Here’s how Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o stack up in a direct comparison
The Anthropic logo on a red background.

In the ever-growing large language model (LLMs) landscape, two front-runners stand out from the rest of the race: Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet and OpenAI's GPT-4o (the "o" stands for "Omni"). Both AIs boast impressive capabilities, but which reigns supreme? This guide dives deep into Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o, dissecting their strengths and weaknesses across various tasks.

We'll not only explore their relative accuracy and response speeds, but also unpack their pricing structures and service tiers. By the end of this article, you'll be armed with the knowledge to make an informed decision about which LLM best suits your specific needs and budget.
Pricing and tiers
ChatGPT users can access the GPT-4o model for free, but the number of queries you're allowed to ask it within a three-hour span is limited. Exceeding that limit will move you down to using GPT-3.5, OpenAI's older, less capable model, until the cooldown timer has reset.

Read more