Skip to main content

AMD just won the core wars, and it still has a trump card up its sleeve

AMD embarasses Intel with Threadripper 3000, even without its 64-core flagship

Mission accomplished. The long road to dominance that AMD started on with the launch of its first-generation Ryzen processors has finally reached its conclusion, with AMD sitting atop the pile. Its new-generation of Threadripper CPUs is here, launching on the very same day as Intel’s lukewarm, 10th-generation Cascade Lake chips. The difference is stark. So stark, in fact, that Intel may take years to recover and AMD isn’t even done yet.

AMD has been on a tear for the past two years, delivering major improvements in both its CPU and GPU divisions. But where it’s really shone is in returning us to a processor development cycle that delivers serious performance enhancements year on year. In 2019, it’s done so once again, this time upping the ante in ways we haven’t seen the red team do since its Athlon 64 days.

Digital Trends

With Ryzen 3000 we saw a 15% increase in instructions per clock, finally bringing mainstream AMD CPUs within a hair’s breadth of Intel’s single-threaded performance. Combined with boosted clock speeds and better memory latency, Ryzen 3000 chips offer better bang for buck in almost the entire product stack.

But as with the first-generation Ryzen CPUs, AMD’s big win in 2019 was heralded by a further advancement into higher-core counts. Where Zen CPUs taught us that six cores was perfectly viable for mid-tier processors, and eight cores were to be expected at the top, Zen 2 took us one step further.

Mainstream CPUs under $500 now offer up to 12-cores. Move those goalposts up to $750 and there are 16-core chips available, with the same, strong single-threaded performance to boot.

While Threadripper 3000 has yet to push the core-count boundaries beyond what we saw with the second-generation, it has delivered something that just wasn’t possible before: a CPU that has both huge core counts and strong single-threaded performance too.

The new 3960X and 3970X CPUs have 24 and 32-cores a piece, with double the number of supporting threads thanks to simultaneous multithreading. Just take a look at some of the results from the likes of Anandtech, PCWorld, or KitGuruTech. They are embarrassing for Intel. Its brand new, 18-core, 10980XE get absolutely destroyed by the new CPUs.  Even the $3,000, server-grade Xeon W-3175X part, with its 28 cores, is no match for AMD’s new best. And that’s not even the best the red team has planned.

On the very same day where its up-to-32-core Threadripper 3000 CPUs pulled the rug out from Intel, AMD officially announced the impending arrival of its 3990X. A 64-core, 128-thread HEDT processor that should deliver performance far in excess of what even the 3970X is capable of. Set to debut in January, the 3990X will be the most powerful CPU outside of AMD’s own Epyc server line of CPUs, and it will likely challenge them too.

We don’t yet know what the 3990X will cost — though $3,000 seems like a good ballpark guess. But at this point, AMD can effectively set its own standards. The 9900KS might hold on to a slim margin in pure gaming tests, but if you do anything else on your PC, buying Intel’s long-in-the-tooth 14nm hardware feels like a dead-end.

The only question now is whether AMD can keep up with demand. It’s going to be high.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
AMD’s most popular CPU is right around the corner
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X between two finger tips.

AMD may soon expand its Zen 5 processor range with the Ryzen 5 9600. Typically, these budget-oriented CPUs find their homes in many PCs, gaming and otherwise, so this could be an interesting offering. How will it rank among some of the best processors? Here's what we know so far.

The information comes from X (Twitter) leaker Hoang Anh Phu, who sent out a message indicating that the AMD Ryzen 5 9600 will be available in late January. This tracks, because AMD is set to host a keynote during CES 2025 in early January, so a release date later that same month makes sense.

Read more
AMD’s next-gen APU may trail behind the RX 6600
AMD's CEO delivering the Computex 2024 presentation.

AMD's next-gen APU lineup, dubbed Strix Halo, is right around the corner -- but for now, all we can rely on are leaks when it comes to information about these processing units. Today, a leaked Geekbench test gave us some insight into the graphics performance of one of the upcoming top processors. While the integrated GPU sports more cores, it failed to beat the aging RX 6600, and actually trailed behind by a significant margin.

Brace yourself, because the APU in question has a name that you'll need to write down. In the Geekbench test, the chip is referred to as AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 w/ Radeon 8060S. The actual product name will likely omit the mention of the GPU, but even just the first part is quite a mouthful. AMD also drops the "9" that you'd usually expect to see in a flagship processor, such as the Ryzen 9 9900X.

Read more
Everyone hates this AMD CPU, but I still use it in my PC
A small form factor build inside the Fractal Terra.

Gamers Nexus called it a "wasted opportunity." Hardware Unboxed declared it a "flop." Even in our own Ryzen 7 9700X review, I said the CPU doesn't have "enough meat on the bone to justify an upgrade." So, why does the Ryzen 7 9700X top the list of the best processors? And more importantly, why am I using one in my personal PC?

I'll do my best to answer these forced questions. The disappointment in the Ryzen 7 9700X isn't truly universal -- no opinions about PC hardware are -- but there's no doubt that it's the outcast in AMD's lineup of Ryzen 9000 CPUs. It's not great for gaming in the face of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, and you can save $50 to $70 with the Ryzen 7 7700X while getting largely similar productivity performance. But AMD's trusty little Zen 5 octa-core is still at the heart of my high-end gaming PC, and I wouldn't have it any other way.
A flexible little devil

Read more