Skip to main content

Here’s why crusty, old CRT monitors are still better than modern gaming displays

Image used with permission by copyright holder

CRT monitors might be best remembered for breaking the backs of anyone trying to haul them from place to place, but they might still be one of the best ways to play games. They’re still big, bulky, and if you’re buying the best of the best, even quite expensive and hard to find. But that doesn’t deny the results.

Digital Foundry recently conducted a deep dive into modern gaming on classic CRT displays. While the team did base most of their research on an extremely rare and high-end CRT, the legendary Sony GDM-FW900, they did also look at a 19-inch 4:3 Sony Trinitron G400, which cost just 10 euros ($11 U.S.).

They claim that both look absolutely fantastic, and the ability to play at lower resolutions (they cite 1,024 x 768) with high-detail settings and ray tracing fully enabled in games like Remedy Entertainment’s Control lead to a fantastic experience. Especially since gaming at lower resolution meant that a locked 120 FPS rate was easy to achieve and made for steady and smooth gameplay throughout.

DF Direct! Modern Games Look Amazing On CRT Monitors... Yes, Better than LCD!

Cathode ray tube technology has long since been supplanted by more modern, “flat-screen” technologies — and for good reason. These devices are cheaper, consume less power, and can be produced to much broader dimensions without also investing a near-equal amount of space for their sheer depth.

But even with all of LCD’s advantages, in many ways, it’s still playing catch-up to CRT’s strengths. Due to the way the underlying display technology works, CRT monitors still hold some advantages over even the best OLED screens available today. They enjoy almost zero input lag, regardless of refresh rate. They don’t have a native resolution, so playing games at lower resolutions doesn’t introduce the blur we see on LCD monitors.

For those intrigued by the specifications of what many consider the best gaming CRT ever made, the FW900 had a viewable screen size of 22.5-inches, could max out at 2,560 x 1,600, but enabled an 80Hz refresh rate at a far less common resolution of 2,304 x 1,440. Its vertical refresh rate could hit 160Hz, however, so it’s not far behind some of the fastest gaming monitors you can buy today.

But refresh rate wasn’t the big take away for Digital Foundry in its testing. The most noticeable factor, and one that appears to have the hosts excited about where screen technology will go (or bring us back to) in years to come, is the reduced motion blur of CRT. Or rather, the near elimination of it.

As they explain in the video, even some of the best LCD displays suffer from a lower motion resolution than their static resolution, resulting in worse looking images as you move around, particularly in games or when watching high-paced action. That’s not an issue with CRTs, which look crisp and clear no matter what you’re doing.

Higher-refresh-rate screens help alleviate this problem, but we’re not there yet. And for cheaper displays, there’s a long way to go.

Most aren’t likely to run out and buy an ancient and enormous CRT display because of this lone report and, like many gaming visuals, it is likely to be quite subjective. But it is intriguing that over a decade on from LCD sales overtaking those of CRT displays, those old cathode ray tubes still have some tricks up their sleeves that the new, sleeker displays just can’t replicate.

Editors' Recommendations

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
I love my OLED gaming monitor, but I feel like it’s gaslighting me
Desktop background on the Alienware 34 QD-OLED.

Most lists that count down the best gaming monitors produce a common result at the top: Alienware's 34 QD-OLED. Even after almost a year on the market, it remains the reigning champ in the world of gaming displays, so much so that I bought one a few months ago to upgrade my own personal setup.

And I love it. There's really only one problem that I've encountered: the incessant nagging to refresh the panel to prevent OLED burn-in.

Read more
I finally gave PC gaming a shot. Here’s why I’m a true believer now
HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless headset leaning against a gaming PC.

As long as I've been a gamer, I've always stuck with home consoles. From the NES to the PlayStation 5, consoles were always my gaming home base, and I was happy with the convenience of it. When it comes to PC gaming, though, I've always watched from afar, jealous of the buttery-smooth frame rates and graphics, but intimidated by the parts, drivers, settings, and prices.

But the time had come. I needed a new PC anyways, and I was ready to see if everything the PC Master Race folks preached really lived up to the hype. As it turns out, being told what PC gaming had to offer didn't make me a believer -- but feeling it for myself did the trick.
Ready Player 2

Read more
Samsung’s first flat mini-LED gaming monitor doesn’t come cheap
Samsung's 2023 Odyssey Neo G7 sitting on a table.

After announcing 2023's Odyssey Neo G7 earlier this year, Samsung finally revealed the price for the display. The 43-inch mini-LED monitor runs $1,000, and listings are live now. Unfortunately, it has some stiff competition from the best gaming monitors.

It's a significant size increase over last year's version, jumping from 32 inches to 43 inches while maintaining a 16:9 aspect ratio. Samsung says the panel has a 144Hz refresh rate and 1 millisecond response time, as well as DisplayHDR 600 certification from VESA and Samsung's own HDR10+ certification.

Read more