Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

The M2 MacBook Pro’s performance is far worse than anyone thought

By
Add as a preferred source on Google

Additional benchmarks have shown the entry-level model of Apple’s MacBook Pro with an M2 chip is performing far worse than anyone expected. This comes after initial tests revealed that the device had a slower SSD when compared to last year’s MacBook Pro with an M1 chip.

Spotted by MacRumors, the M2 MacBook Pro reportedly lags behind in day-to-day multitasking performance in apps like Photoshop, Lightroom, and Final Cut Pro. Even file transfers to an external SSD suffer on Apple’s latest flagship laptop. This is all because the M2 MacBook Pro appears to be using space on the 256GB SSD as virtual memory when the in-built 8GB of Apple Unified memory is used up by the system and other apps.

Recommended Videos

Just like the issue with SSD speeds, this is believed to be due to the fact that Apple is only using a single NAND chip on the 2022 MacBook Pro 13-inch M2 models. That’s compared to the M1 MacBook Pro, which has two NAND chips for faster speeds.

MacBook Pro 13-inch M2
Apple

A lot of the tests in question have been done by the YouTuber, Max Tech. In his 12-minute video, he showcases that when his tests are down on their own without background activity, the M2 MacBook Pro defeats the M1 MacBook Air. It’s only when multitasking and background activity on both machines comes into play that things go bad for Apple’s latest 13-inch flagship laptop.

For basic multitasking in Google Chrome, the M2 MacBook Pro loads several tabs and pages like Google Drive slower than the M1 MacBook Pro. Having that open on top of exporting 50 RAW images in Adobe Lightroom Classic, meanwhile, takes longer on the M2 MacBook Pro at a time of 4 minutes and 12 seconds versus just 3 minutes and 36 seconds on the M1 MacBook Pro.

In other tests done by Max Tech, the Apple M2 MacBook Pro falls even further behind the M1 MacBook Pro with so-called “pro app” background activity going in Final Cut Pro. A 5-minute 4K HVEC export on the M2 MacBook Pro took a total of 4 minutes and 49 seconds. The M1 MacBook Pro did that same test in 3 minutes and 36 seconds with similar background activity.

Even SSD File Transfers appear to suffer on the M2 MacBook Pro. Max Tech finds that in his video transfer tests, the M1 MacBook Pro writes a 35GB video file to an external SSD in 34 seconds, but the M2 MacBook Pro does it in 1 minute and 25 seconds.  As for read speeds, the results are closer, with the M2 MacBook Pro doing it in 58 seconds, and the M1 MacBook Pro doing it in 45 seconds.

With all this in mind, if you’re considering buying a new MacBook Pro model with an M2 chip, you should definitely pay for the $200 upgrade and buy the higher-end model with 512GB of storage. Or, hold off and buy an older M1 model.

Arif Bacchus
Arif Bacchus
Former Computing Writer
Arif Bacchus is a native New Yorker and a fan of all things technology. Arif works as a freelance writer at Digital Trends…
Topics
AMD just made Ryzen laptop chips even more confusing, but here’s what’s actually new
The refreshed lineup brings more Zen 4 processors to mainstream and budget laptops.
AMD Ryzen 100 and 200 series

AMD has quietly expanded its mobile processor portfolio with 11 new Ryzen laptop processors, adding fresh models under both the Ryzen 200 and Ryzen 100 families. While that sounds straightforward enough, the bigger story isn't the chips themselves -- it's AMD's increasingly confusing naming strategy. The company has introduced seven new Ryzen 200 processors alongside four new Ryzen 100 models, but despite belonging to different series, many of them are actually built on the same Hawk Point silicon featuring Zen 4 CPU cores and RDNA 3 integrated graphics.

The Ryzen 200 series gets seven new CPUs

Read more
OpenAI is killing ChatGPT Atlas browser. I loved it, but it was an uphill race to the top
It was a trailblazer in a few ways, before it was copied down to its skeleton.
ChatGPT Atlas browser on a MacBook.

When OpenAI launched its own web browser, there was plenty of skepticism as to why a frontier AI lab is even bothering with making a browser in the first place. And yet, the company went ahead and launched ChatGPT Atlas with a heavy dosage of AI features built in. Well, the days of browser ambitions are over, and it will be put on cold ice in September this year.

OpenAI says it is sunsetting the short-lived browser in favor of pushing the new ChatGPT work desktop app, which already has a built-in browser as well as a cloud browser for AI agents. And now that ChatGPT is making its way to other browsers, such as Chrome, as an extension, there is little need for maintaining a dedicated browser project of its own.

Read more
Windows 11 Search is getting bigger, but only by 4 pixels
The change could be in preparation for the upcoming Ask Copilot feature
Windows 11 Laptop

If you have used Windows 11 Search after the June update, you may have noticed it feels a little less annoying. Microsoft recently made the Start menu and Search more responsive, and also fixed one of Search’s stranger limits by letting it find local files using just two characters.

Now, the company appears to be making a much smaller change. According to Windows Central, Microsoft accidentally revealed that the search box in the Taskbar and Start menu is getting 4 pixels taller. Four pixels sounds like the kind of change only a UI/UX designer could love, but screenshots from the Insider Preview build suggest it is visible once you know where to look.

Read more