Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Microsoft’s Project Spartan browser will not enable Do Not Track by default

Add as a preferred source on Google

Though it was considered a champion of privacy when it enabled Do Not Track (DNT) by default in the 2012 release of its Internet Explorer browser, it looks like Microsoft will be reversing that decision. Beginning with its next browser, currently code-named Spartan, Microsoft will have DNT disabled by default.

This news was announced by the software giant’s chief privacy officer, Brendon Lynch, in a blog post, where he blamed the company’s change of stance on “evolving” standards online and within the technology industry. While this could easily suggest that Microsoft is pandering to a stronger advertising lobby, or that people don’t care about privacy in the same way as they did a few years ago, Lynch claims that instead, disabling the feature is a more accurate reflection of web standards that are pioneered and championed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

Recommended Videos

In the latest W3C filings, the Microsoft points out that enabling a feature by default, could be considered just as much a reflection of a vendor or organization’s choice, rather than that of the individual. By leaving the choice up to them as to whether they want it enabled or not, it lets the user decide for themselves.

As the specific part of the W3C briefing states: “In the absence of user choice, there is no tracking preference expressed.”

DNT was initially conceived in 2009 as a way for users to opt-out of having data about them tracked by advertisers and other parties. One of the major problems with the standard is the fact it’s not really enforceable; websites can simply elect not to honor the request. This was a contributing factor to Microsoft’s decision to drop enabling the feature by default, as Lynch stated in his blog post that “websites that receive a DNT signal from the new browsers [with DNT enabled by default] could argue that it doesn’t reflect the users’ preference, and therefore, choose not to honor it.”

While this may seem a major change of course, it’s likely to be inconsequential for privacy. Many websites don’t currently honor DNT, including Facebook and Google, so there’s limited benefit to enabling it. That will remain true until the standard’s enforcement gains teeth.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale covers how to guides, best-of lists, and explainers to help everyone understand the hottest new hardware and…
ChatGPT Images 2.5 lets you sketch what you want instead of trying to describe it
ChatGPT images 2.5

OpenAI is rolling out ChatGPT Images 2.5, its newest image generation model, and it brings a solid mix of speed and quality upgrades that should make your AI art sessions a lot less frustrating. People are already generating over 3 billion images every week across ChatGPT and the API, and this update is built to make that process faster and noticeably more accurate.

What makes Images 2.5 different?

Read more
Intel is about to make PC chips even more expensive, and some could vanish altogether
Intel is done competing on price, and its supply chain is warning that your next CPU purchase will cost noticeably more.
MacBook Pro Intel version

Intel's chips are about to get pricier again, and this might not be the last time.

Supply chain sources suggest the company is planning another price hike of roughly 10% starting October 5, 2026. According to a Digitimes report, the company wants to shift from chasing market share through competitive pricing to protecting profit margins. 

Read more
Students who use AI every day may be falling behind, while moderate users pull ahead
New global testing data suggests more AI in the classroom isn't automatically better.
Logo, Text

I assumed more AI access might help students learn faster. However, a new OECD study dispels that misconception for me and everyone else who gave their children a paid version of AI chatbots, thinking it would help them through their educational journey. 

According to PISA 2025 data from 760,000 students in 91 countries, students who use AI daily score meaningfully worse on standardized tests than their peers. The full picture is more complicated than a simple ban would fix.

Read more