Skip to main content

3 computer companies that killed it in 2015 (plus 3 that biffed it)

2015 wasn’t a bad year for computer enthusiasts. Intel released its new Skylake processors, AMD and Nvidia introduced several excellent high-performance video cards, and Microsoft put out Windows 10. This trifecta has made 2015 an excellent time to upgrade from an older rig.

Yet not all is well. Despite these advancements, PC shipments have continued on a slight downward trend, and several scandals, like Lenovo’s adware drama, have tarnished the market’s reputation. Let’s take a look at the companies that came out ahead, as well as those that are hurting.

Winner: Dell

Dell XPS 13 (Skylake)
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

Despite a misstep related to insecure support software, Dell finished 2015 strong thanks to the debut of several excellent systems. The XPS 13 and 15 form a dynamic duo of high-end systems that’s hard to beat, rivaling even Apple’s MacBook Pro in quality. Yet the company also has affordable systems, like the Inspiron 15 7000, and its monitors are the king of the hill.

Its excellent systems have helped Dell secure a comfortable 3rd-place position globally, and 2nd-place position in the United States. Its shipments in the third quarter of 2015 showed global growth, while the market overall declined almost eight percent. Dell is also far along the difficult path of transitioning from a focus on PC production to a broader focus on computing as a whole, covering the spectrum from consumer to enterprise, as well as providing servers and cloud services.

Most importantly, Dell is the only major PC builder besides Apple that has shown a consistent commitment to quality, which is why the XPS 13 earned our Best of Computing 2015 award.

Loser: HP

Hp Envy
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It was tempting to place Lenovo in this slot, given the Superfish fiasco, but the company saw strong growth in the PC segment, and builds some excellent products – areas HP suffers in.

HP recently split into two companies, HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprises. This split is a problem for the former, because it forces the newly minted company into a very narrow category of consumer PCs and printers. It’s also cause a drop to number two in global sales. HP still ships the most units in North America, but its lead is slipping there, too.

A look at the company’s rigs makes it easy to see why. HP’s line-up is full of mediocrity. The HP Omen is not the best gaming laptop, the Spectre x360 is not the best 2-in-1, and the HP Stream 13 is not the best budget PC. Despite its size, HP looks like a house of cards. The slightest disturbance could topple it with shocking speed.

Winner: Nvidia

Nvidia Titan X video card angle
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

Nvidia has been on a tear. The company’s GeForce division has executed a strategy that combines frequent architecture updates, a focus on efficiency, and useful value-added software. The company has a solid video card available at almost every price point, and its high-end cards are almost untouchable. Every single gaming desktop we received for review this year had an Nvidia card in it. That’s not the result of a vast conspiracy – it’s the result of GPUs that serve superior performance with surprisingly low power draw.

The company has also continued its effort to branch out. We were impressed by the performance of the Tegra in Google’s Pixel C, and its hardware debuted in Tesla’s Model X. It seems nothing can stop the green team’s ascent.

Loser: AMD

amdfury2
AMD

AMD’s past half-decade has been rough, but 2015 was particularly harsh. All the news coming from the company’s investor relations department looks bad. Operating income is down, revenue is down, margins are down.

That’s translated to disappointing products. AMD’s biggest debut of 2015 was the Fury X, an innovative liquid-cooled video card that featured the world’s first implementation of High Bandwidth Memory, but it ultimately failed to beat Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 980 Ti. AMD’s processors, meanwhile, remain uncompetitive against Intel across a broad range of price points, and particularly poor for gaming systems, where lower efficiency at the same clock rate really holds the red team back.

It’s hard to see any way to right the ship. Less income means less to spend on research and development, which is what AMD needs to get back in the game. A buyout or investment from a larger company could be its only hope.

Winner: Microsoft

Windows-10-home-screen-user
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Windows 10 was a big deal. After the disastrous Windows 8, which alienated both everyday users and hardcore PC enthusiasts, Microsoft needed to prove it still understood how people use the desktop. Fortunately, the latest version of Windows did exactly that, and introduced some innovative new features. Now that we’ve used Task View, it’s hard to imagine going back to an OS without it.

Microsoft also scored points with its Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book hardware. Both systems are attractive, portable, surprisingly quick, and make a strong argument for the company’s vision of Windows. They focus on productivity, yet are also capable when it comes time to sit back and relax with an eBook or streaming video.

Loser: Microsoft

windows-10-phone-v2
Image used with permission by copyright holder

But Microsoft’s triumph on the desktop has been hampered by Windows 10 Mobile. It’s the same story as with previous versions of Windows for phones. The company made big promises its BUILD conference, boasting support for a full desktop environment, and unveiling projects that could bring compatibility with Android and iPhone apps.

Those promises haven’t held up. Windows 10 Mobile can run a desktop, but it can’t yet run x86 applications, and it’s not clear when the promised porting tools will be available. Project Astoria, that would allow emulation of Android apps, has been delayed indefinitely. Project Islandwood, which will help developers port from iOS to Windows 10 Mobile, is still in progress, but the release window remains unannounced.

The company has also suffered issues with Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book firmware support, and made OneDrive users angry when it unexpectedly decided to reduce storage for both free and paid users. These problems have offset the positive feelings the company earned with Windows 10.

Conclusion

This list doesn’t hold many surprises. While 2015 was great for the PC faithful, it wasn’t strong because of nimble new start-ups. Instead it was the big companies that made news, sinking or swimming in stormy waters.

That may soon change, however. VR headsets will debut within the first few months of 2016, and the major competitors – Oculus’ Rift and HTC’s Vive – will be tied to the computer. We’re excited to see how that spurs new, innovative tech in the PC space.

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
Spatial computing went public this year, but the true test is ahead
Apple Vision Pro's spatial computing could make it easier to work from home.

2023 was the year the world at large was introduced to the term spatial computing. Even though Apple didn't invent the term, its use of it while announcing the Vision Pro instead of "mixed-reality" or "augmented reality" was notable.

In short, a spatial computer is a new type of device with a wearable display, the ability to sense the surrounding area, and a user interface based on the wearer's hands, eyes, and voice instead of a traditional screen. But Apple is hardly alone in its pursuit. 2023 saw some huge releases from major players in the game, pushing this technology to places it's never been before, but it will only get bigger in 2024.
Spatial computing in 2023
As we approach the end of 2023, let's review several devices that almost qualify as spatial computers but fall short of replacing your laptop or revolutionizing computing. AR and VR headsets that include hand-tracking and some form of computer vision are intriguing but ultimately aren't practical enough for most people. AR glasses and smart glasses are much more inviting due to their relatively small and light form but lack complete spatial computing features.
AR headsets
A rendering of virtual graphics seen in a Microsoft HoloLens. Microsoft / Microsoft

Read more
Intel is cooking up an exciting DLSS 3 rival
Kena Bridge of Spirits on the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9.

Intel is working on a rival to Nvidia's DLSS 3. Intel and researchers from the University of California published a paper detailing the tech, currently dubbed ExtraSS, at Siggraph Asia 2023 (spotted by Wccftech). It accomplishes the same goal as DLSS 3 by generating new frames to improve performance. Unlike DLSS 3, however, ExtraSS uses frame extrapolation, not frame interpolation.

That latter method is how DLSS 3 (and AMD's FSR 3) works. It takes two sequential frames and compares them to generate a frame in-between. This naturally means you're playing on a slight delay, as the tech needs both the current and next frame to do its dirty work. Intel is proposing a technique that uses extrapolation, where it uses data only from previous frames to predict the next frame. That gets rid of the latency issue currently present in DLSS 3.

Read more
Can the Quest 3 replace my laptop for work? I found out the hard way
Alan Truly using a Quest 3 with a MacBook Air for work.

When Meta launched the Quest 3 in October, the focus was on mixed reality gaming, but I wondered if it was ready for work. Because the truth is that spatial computing is the latest challenge for VR headsets.

It might sound odd, but VR headsets should be used for more than just games. Most computing devices serve a variety of purposes. Your PC works all day with you, then transitions to entertainment, whether watching movies, browsing the web, or playing games. The best VR headsets can be just as functional --  at least, in theory.
What's needed for work?

Read more