Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Reviews

Feet on: Razor Hovertrax 2.0

We rode one of the only hoverboards certified not to blow up

Add as a preferred source on Google
razor hovertrax 20 feet on  2 0
Image used with permission by copyright holder

“Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.“

You may walk the Razor’s edge … but you’ll never be blown up by one.

Recommended Videos

That’s the premise behind the new Hovertrax 2.0 from scooter company Razor, which carries a sticker for the brand-new UL 2272 standard, a certification from the authorities at Underwriters Lab specifically designed to ensure that so-called hoverboards meet safety standards. And there are only a handful of boards that meet the standard to date.

“Last year Razor shipped 1.2 million units,” David Kim, director of sales for the company, told Digital Trends. “We know a little something about this stuff.”

The UL 2272 standard evaluates the safety of the electrical drive train, battery, charger, and how the systems work together, the group explains. The new standard focuses on individual lithium-ion cells and multicell battery packs, which are of particular concern. “This is where most of the issues could arise from, because the battery pack carries a lot of energy in a small package. The battery pack is something that, when one of the cells faults, it could involve others,” Consumer Safety Director John Drengenberg, who has worked for UL for more than 50 years, told Cnet. “It has a domino effect that could cause the fires that we might have seen.”

Kim confirmed that it’s battery packs causing the problem. “Most of the fires that we know of are because of the cheap, knock-off batteries and the chargers that are associated with it.” Razor’s product uses only premium batteries from LG, Kim said, another thing that makes them safer, he claims.

You see, hoverboards are awesome. Hoverboards also blow up, which has led to nationwide bans on their use in subways, on airplanes, and in your living room (oh come on, Mom!). The UL 2272 standard aims to guide consumers toward those electric scooter that don’t blow up. This is a Good Thing.

“Most of the fires that we know of are because of the cheap, knock-off batteries.”

The Hovertrax 2.0 looks like any other electric scooter: It’s two feet wide, with two rubber wheels covered by plastic hoods with bumpers. Our model was a beautiful shade of blue, with LED taillights in front and a battery indicator and power-on switch in the middle, between where your feet fit. It supports up to 220 pounds. Cheap models (and cheap drones, for that matter) come with cheap chargers that don’t shut themselves down when the battery is fully charged. Razor’s will, meaning you can leave it plugged in to charge overnight; a full charge takes four hours and supports up to 60 minutes of continuous riding.

It’s also a self-balancing unit: “All the other products out there don’t self balance — you have to actually get on it and balance yourself,” Kim explained. Getting on and off these devices is the most dangerous (and most challenging) part. Your foot movements control the board’s forward and backward movements: Angle a foot forward and the motor in that wheel housing will start the board going. With models that don’t automatically level themselves, the rider must do that – and it’s easy to activate the motor at the same time.

Razor Hovertrax 2.0
Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends
Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

The entire Digital Trends office has now tested out the Hovertrax 2.0, and with very few exceptions, we’ve become pretty solid riders. We can do tricks. We zip back and forth, and do spins fast enough to make your head start spinning. We’ve fallen off too, of course, but only once or twice. And most importantly, we haven’t exploded.

Remember I said that only a few models meet the standard? One of the others is the Ninebot by Segway miniPRO, which was certified in May, 2016 (along with the Razor product and models from Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co Ltd., PTX Performance Products, Shenzhen Global E-Commerce Co Ltd., and Wuyi Chuangxin Metal Tools Co Ltd.). You might recall Segway as the company that sought to change the world with its self-balancing two-wheeled vehicles. Hoverboards ate Segway’s lunch, however, as did cheap Chinese knock-offs – one of which ended up swallowing the company whole.

Razor says it’s the only model with an actual license to the patent covering hoverboards, which is owned by Californian inventor Shane Chen. In January, Segway filed its latest lawsuit against Razor (and a company called Swagway), alleging that its patents cover self-balancing scooters, not Chen’s. Meanwhile, Razor has been on a tear too, suing anyone and everyone in order to stem the flow of cheap products.

“In America, we’re the only brand [with a license from Chen], and we will litigate wherever possible,” Kim told me.

Jeremy Kaplan
As Editor in Chief, Jeremy Kaplan transformed Digital Trends from a niche publisher into one of the fastest growing…
The best tech of IFA 2026: a repairable laptop, liquid-cooled power bank, AI toothbrush, and more
From an AI toothbrush to a liquid-cooled battery, this is the best tech of IFA 2026
Best Of IFA 2026

IFA Berlin brought innovation from across the globe into one giant exhibition, and we got the chance to experience the new-gen "tech" firsthand. Walking through Messe Berlin, we saw a laptop designed to be repaired at home to a power bank with visible liquid coolant, an AI-powered toothbrush with a camera inside your mouth, and a robot vacuum carrying another.

The variety is what makes IFA one of the best tech shows. IFA 2026 runs from September 4 through 8, and we've spent our time in Berlin chasing down the products that caught our eyes. Some of these are clever ideas that may change how we use tech every day, while others solve a problem that I didn't realize existed.

Read more
OpenAI admits it needs to rethink what happens when AI goes rogue
As increasingly capable AI agents move beyond controlled tests, OpenAI is confronting a difficult question: When does strange model behavior become an incident the public deserves to know about?
OpenAI logo on blurred background

OpenAI has spent plenty of time explaining how it plans to stop increasingly capable AI agents from doing things they shouldn't. Now, the company says it needs to get better at telling everyone when those things have already happened. The admission follows reports of another previously undisclosed incident involving OpenAI's AI agents, this time affecting a German-language programming wiki. According to Reuters, agents made more than 15,000 unauthorized edits to DseWiki, using the site to communicate and share ways to bypass restrictions, cheat on tasks, and avoid detection.

OpenAI has now acknowledged what it calls the "wiki incident" and says the episode exposed a larger problem with how AI companies disclose unexpected model behavior. The company says it is developing a framework for deciding when and how to make incidents involving misaligned AI public.

Read more
AI has a safety problem nobody is ready for
AI safety efforts are ramping up, but their protections don’t work equally well everywhere. In developing countries, language gaps and cultural blind spots can turn everyday AI mistakes into serious real-world consequences.
Logo, Hockey, Ice Hockey

AI companies are spending an enormous amount of time worrying about what happens when their models become too capable. OpenAI even took the unusual step of temporarily pausing training on a model last month over safety concerns, as the industry grapples with risks ranging from autonomous behavior to increasingly sophisticated cyber capabilities.

But there’s another AI safety problem that is much easier to overlook: the protections already being built into these systems don’t necessarily work equally well for everyone. A new report from Rest of World highlights how AI safety efforts remain heavily centered around the needs of wealthier, English-speaking countries. That can leave people in parts of Asia, Africa, and other developing regions dealing with problems as basic and potentially dangerous as a chatbot misunderstanding their language.

Read more