Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Gaming
  3. Evergreens

How we review video games at Digital Trends

Add as a preferred source on Google

In the age of $70 games, every purchase can be a major investment. A good game review can help someone make sure that their money (and time) is going toward an experience they’re going to get something out of. If a game launches with serious bugs or broken mechanics, potential buyers should know that upfront.

But that’s not the only function of a game review.

As the video game medium evolves, so does the way we play. Many games aren’t just escapist entertainment anymore. They have loftier storytelling goals, as they try to communicate themes to players through interactivity. A game like The Last of Us Part 2 is compelling because it actually has something to say about the inescapable nature of cyclical violence, and it expresses that through its play. A review isn’t always something you read before you buy a game; it can spark a dialogue with someone who’s already played something and wants to chew on it more. Just like a movie, our interaction with a game doesn’t have to stop when the credits roll.

Screenshot from The Last of Us Part II
Naughty Dog

At Digital Trends, we believe that these two approaches to reviews can, and should, coexist. We want to help readers spend both their money and time on games they’ll love. But we also aim to dig deeper than that, breaking down how effectively games tell a story, communicate ideas, or tackle themes. There’s no reason we shouldn’t critique video games the same way we do movies or novels.

Video games will only become stronger the more we dissect what works and what doesn’t. That means that we’re not afraid to get critical when a game is fun, but is clumsy in its thematic ambitions — and vice versa. We never come at games from a place of condescension. PC, console, mobile, it doesn’t matter — we believe all forms of gaming have value and deserve the same level of care.

Our ultimate aim is to help move gaming forward as a medium with thoughtful criticism. When we’re tough, it always comes from a constructive place, not a cynical one. When we recommend a game, it’s because we believe it’s a truly special experience that’s worthy of your attention.

How we play

We don’t aim to play every game to 100% completion. Rather, we tackle games at a more natural rate that we feel reflects the way many players experience games. Writers generally play a game through to its end when it has a defined goal, and they try to engage with as many of its systems as possible.

Throughout our playthroughs, we assess a variety of factors. The most immediate consideration is gameplay. How does it feel to play a game? Is it fun? If not, are its mechanics effectively serving another purpose? We won’t simply say “the shooting feels good” and leave it at that. We’ll always go deeper to figure out the underlying reason a mechanic is satisfying or doesn’t work as intended.

Colt sneaks up on a group of enemies in Deathloop.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

We treat a game’s thematic ideas or story just as seriously as gameplay. If a game is trying to communicate something to a player, we’ll always do our best to engage with those ideas and discuss how effectively they’re handled. That doesn’t mean that we see games that aim to be simple fun as inferior — we assess a game relative to what it wants to accomplish, whether that’s deep thought or pure entertainment.

Aesthetic critiques are based on how well a given style suits the game’s goal. Graphics don’t need to be photo-realistic or cutting edge. If a Nintendo game features simple, bright visuals that evoke a playful, childlike tone, we’ll take intent into account.

We value the quality of content in a game over quantity. A giant, AAA open-world game may contain 100 hours of gameplay, but what does it matter if it’s not an interesting space to explore? If a game is 10 hours long with little incentive to replay, but delivers a memorable experience, we’ll value it just as much as an endless live service game.

How games are scored

We believe in using the full range of our scoring rubric with gaming. We don’t see a three-and-a-half star review (what you’d traditionally call a “7/10”) as a death sentence for a video game. That’s the mark of a strong, often recommended game with plenty to like, though it may have flaws that will turn some players away. Similarly, a two-and-a-half star review does not translate to “terrible.” It means that we find the game to be average, with a fair share of pros and cons.

When we score a game four stars and above, we believe it’s truly special. A four-star game delivers a truly memorable experience that will stick with you for long after you’ve put the controller down. Not every competently developed, high-budget game achieves this. Developers continue to raise the bar for what games can accomplish, and our own bar raises accordingly.

A party of heroes battles in Tales of Arise.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Five-star reviews are a rarity, because we want that distinction to mean something. We hold a deep reverence for old gaming websites and magazines that were very judicious with their top honors. Would The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time hold the legacy it has today if it hadn’t received near-unanimous perfect scores from publications at the time? A five-star review means that a game not only pushes the industry forward, but that it will stand the test of time and be considered an integral part of gaming’s canon moving forward. It’s a rare occurrence, and we hope that you’ll trust our judgment when we identify games that deserve the distinction.

How awards are given

We have one award badge that we give out to games: Editor’s Choice. A Editor’s Choice means that we believe a game is good enough to be a standout in its genre. These are the games you’ll largely see on our “Best of” lists across the site, because we truly believe they’re the top picks.

Games are often expensive and a gargantuan time commitment. When you see it at the top of a review, it’s a signal that we think a game is worth playing even if you aren’t particularly keen on its genre. These are truly special games that deserve broad attention.

Just because a game doesn’t receive an Editor’s Choice badge doesn’t mean we don’t recommend it. Every game has an audience, and we do our best to identify who each game we review will resonate with. These badges just help narrow down what’s a safe bet if you have a limited budget or little time to play.

Giovanni Colantonio
As a veteran of the industry who first began writing about games professionally as a teenager, Giovanni brings a wealth of…
Modern Warfare 4 brings Call of Duty back to its glory days. I hope the streak lives.
Infinity Ward’s latest campaign goes back to Call of Duty’s roots and recaptures what made me a fan more than a decade ago.
Call of Duty MW4 menu screen

The Call of Duty franchise has held a special place in my heart ever since I played my first Black Ops game back in 2010. That game's campaign was something else, with twists and turns that culminated in a mind-blowing finale. We can all admit that compared to those older campaigns, the recent CODs have been lackluster at best, and a complete and utter disappointment at worst. The reboot of Modern Warfare did give me some hope, as the first two installments were actually quite good, but the third game left such a bad taste in my mouth that I wasn’t exactly expecting much from Modern Warfare 4.

After recently finishing the campaign, I can say that this installment is nothing like the recent releases and instead feels closer to the franchise’s roots. For the first time in a long while, the campaign comes across as well-crafted rather than rushed to hit a release date. It arrives three years after MW3, and you can see exactly where all that time went. It seems the studio finally made listening to player feedback a priority.

Read more
Epic is throwing $50,000 for vibe-code games. What could possibly go wrong?
Epic is rewarding vibe-coded games with real money
Epic MegaJam 2026

Epic Games has just announced the 2026 Epic AI MegaJam, which is looking to see how much game development can be squeezed into a very short window. This is running from November 12 through November 15.

Participants can work alone or in teams of up to five people, build in Unreal Engine or Unreal Editor for Fortnite, and bring along “as many AI agents as you want.” Epic explicitly encourages coding agents, AI-generated assets, audio tools, writing tools, and other AI systems. The official event page literally says "Vibe your way to $50k.”

Read more
Monster Hunter Outlanders arrives on Android and iOS next week with four-player co-op
The free-to-play spin-off launches October 29 with open-world exploration, mobile-focused combat, and a building system.
Monster Hunter Outlanders poster

It’s turning into a pretty good time to be a Monster Hunter fan who plays on a phone. Capcom has confirmed that Monster Hunter Outlanders will launch on Android and iOS on October 29, giving the series a new mobile-first game just as Monster Hunter Rise is also preparing to make the jump to smartphones through Netflix.

Outlanders is being developed by Tencent subsidiary TiMi Studio Group under license and supervision from Capcom. Unlike Rise, which appears to be the full console and PC game adapted for mobile, Outlanders is a free-to-play survival hunting game made specifically for phones.

Read more