Skip to main content

The NCAA isn’t done with EA yet, at least not legally

ncaa isnt done ea yet least legally
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Following a settlement between Electronic Arts and the Collegiate Licensing Company, and the current and former student athletes suing them (as well as the NCAA), the NCAA has now filed a suit of its own against EA and the CLC. The college sports organization alleges that both EA and the CLC breached their contractual obligations, according to USA Today.

The lawsuit seeks to bar the proposed settlement that EA and the CLC had agreed to with the athletes. It would also drag both companies back into the messy litigation with the NCAA that began when former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon brought a suit against the three organizations. O’Bannon’s suit was later joined by former Arizona State and Nebraska football player Sam Keller.

According to the suit filed in Georgia on November 4, the NCAA alleges that both EA and the CLC breached contractual obligations directly relating to the original lawsuit from O’Bannon. One of the claims is that EA did not offer enough liability insurance to cover “pending third-party claims, including for attorneys’ fees that the NCAA has already incurred in defending against those claims.”

The suit would further require EA to cover any future judgments against the NCAA involving EA’s NCAA-licensed games, and it would force EA and the CLC to cover any “reasonable” legal expenses – including those accrued from this new suit itself.

The CLC is also listed in the suit for allegedly failing to grant the NCAA “access to documents and records that the NCAA is entitled to inspect,” as well as not adequately advising EA on the contractual obligations that it allegedly breached.

For the last few years the NCAA, EA, and the CLC have provided a united front in the face of growing criticism and legal pressure over their use of student athletes’ likeness for profit, without compensating the athletes. Earlier this year though, the NCAA elected not to renew its license agreement with EA, effectively ending the NCAA Football games after 15 years. EA vowed to carry on with the help of the CLC and through individual license agreements with schools and conferences, despite resistance from both.

In September, EA introduced Andrew Wilson would be the new CEO, and shortly after the company announced that it would end its college football franchise completely after 20 years, and that it had tentatively settled all outstanding lawsuits with the student athletes.

Along with the O’Bannon and Keller suit that brought the NCAA together with EA and the CLC, EA was also the subject of lawsuits by former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston and former Rutgers player Ryan Hart. Following the appointment of Wilson as EA’s CEO – either because of his involvement or simply to tie up loose ends – EA and the CLC offered $40 million in settlement for all three suits, which seemed to end the matter for the two companies, but left the NCAA as the sole defendant in the O’Bannon and Keller suit.

The NCAA claims that the settlement offer was conducted without its involvement or notice, and that EA and the CLC refused to provide the necessary legal documents. Due to the settlement, the NCAA claims that it “has been harmed, continues to be harmed, and will suffer future harm, from EA’s and CLC’s unlawful actions, including irreparable harm.”

Meanwhile the CLC, which is headquartered in Georgia, claims that this is really an issue between EA and the NCAA. “CLC is caught in the middle of a dispute between NCAA and EA which should not involve us,” Andrew Giangola, a spokesman for CLC told USA Today. “CLC has valued relationships with both the NCAA and EA and while we hope they can soon resolve their dispute, we see no reason for CLC to be involved.”

Editors' Recommendations

Ryan Fleming
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Fleming is the Gaming and Cinema Editor for Digital Trends. He joined the DT staff in 2009 after spending time covering…
Respawn’s most exciting upcoming project isn’t Star Wars
Titanfall Key Art of Soldier sitting on his Titan

EA has confirmed that Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order and Apex Legends developer Respawn Entertainment is working on three brand-new Star Wars games: A Fallen Order sequel, a first-person shooter, and a strategy game being co-developed with Bit Reactor. These announcements are great news for Star Wars fans, but it's not the project that excites me the most at Respawn.

While Star Wars is sure to rake in some easy money for EA, Respawn has always been at its best when tackling original ideas. A mysterious project not involving Star Wars or Apex Legends is in the works at Respawn and has the potential to tap into the kinetic gameplay and engaging worldbuilding that make Respawn games so fantastic.
Doing what works
Since 2019, the two main pillars for Respawn Entertainment have been clear. The first is Apex Legends. Set in the universe of Titanfall despite not using the series' name, it was one of the first battle royales able to truly compete with PUBG and Fortnite. It retains millions of players to this day, so Respawn needs to use a lot of resources to support it.

Read more
The best EA games of all time
Cal holding a double bladed lightsaber about to fight an enemy.

EA is one of the biggest publishers in the Western gaming market. They employ thousands of developers across dozens of studios to create games of nearly all sizes, types, and genres. Being around since nearly the beginning of the gaming medium itself, their catalog of games is one of the largest in the industry, and it only continues to grow as their teams produce more and more titles. However, they have earned a somewhat poor reputation in recent years among gamers for how they have treated some of their studios and franchises.

As much hate as the company gets, there's no denying the fact that some of gaming's greatest games and franchises come from EA. In recent years they've even managed to start repairing their image in many gamer's eyes thanks to pulling back on predatory business practices, supporting and improving games that were not well received at launch, and even giving us some traditional single-player experiences. EA might have a few series they're most known for, but they make games for just about every market. Here's what we consider to be the best EA games of all time.

Read more
Halo: Infinite isn’t a stunner, but it’s exactly what the Xbox Series X needs
Halo: Infinite

Microsoft finally showed the first real Halo: Infinite gameplay during its Xbox Series X Games Showcase on July 23, and the memes soon followed. Gamers eager to dish out the salt were quick to jump on the title for its shift in art direction and lack of obvious visual wow-factor.

There are good reasons for the shift, however, and the decision not to prioritize visuals over gameplay will prove to be in Halo: Infinite’s favor. This looks like true old-school Halo delivered on modern hardware.
Performance wins over realism
The memes digging on Halo: Infinite immediately targeted game’s undeniable shift in art. Until now, Halo has pursued a hyper-realistic look filled with gritty soldiers, shiny aliens, and detailed scenery. Infinite is a bit different. The intentionally blocky, flat look of some distant terrain led to sarcastic comparisons to Minecraft.

Read more