Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Gaming
  3. News

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

The Game Awards could have its own Parasite moment tonight if Hades wins big

Giovanni Colantonio
By

The 2020 Game Awards show is tonight, and the Game of the Year category is a hot topic of conversation. While many big budget studio games are competing for top prizes this year, a historic upset could be coming. There’s a very real possibility that indie game Hades could steal the show — and it should.

Hades has been the talk of the industry ever since it exited early access in September. Developer Supergiant Games’ God-filled roguelike game gained widespread praise from critics and fans alike, even winning over players who had written the niche genre off long ago. Now, the game finds itself in the brightest spotlight possible as it goes head-to-head with the likes of The Last of Us Part II — our own Game of the Year pick. That widespread exposure alone is a testament to the comparatively smaller game’s breakout success.

Recommended Videos

A Hades win wouldn’t just be a much-deserved feather in Supergiant’s cap — it would finally give independent games a long overdue seat at a table they’re rarely allowed to eat at.

Related

Always the underdog

The Game Awards have only been around since 2014 and, in that time, an indie game has never won top honors. It’s not hard to see why considering that previous Game of the Year recipients include groundbreaking AAA titles like The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt and The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. Standout indies like Celeste and Inside made their way into the final five previously, but were ultimately long shots against high-budget juggernauts like Overwatch and God of War.

When it comes to high-profile institutions like The Game Awards, indie games are always underdogs. Even the best ones always seem to butt up against a ceiling. In 2019, Disco Elysium won the most awards of any game that year, taking home four statues including Best Narrative and Best RPG. Still, the game was left out of the Game of the Year running entirely, as titles like Super Smash Bros. Ultimate and eventual winner Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice duked it out at the top.

The omission is a head-scratcher in hindsight. Looking at review aggregate site Metacritic, Disco Elysium averaged a 91 while Game of the Year contenders like Death Stranding currently sit at an 82. Aggregate review scores never tell the full story, as subjectivity is fluid, but they do show that Disco Elysium wasn’t a fluke that got to shine because it was a weaker year for RPGs. The game was a critical darling that was one of 2019’s top-reviewed games when all was said and done.

It’s important to note that The Game Awards’ nominations and winners are selected by a jury comprised of a mix of media outlets and influencers. The deadline for nominations comes in early November, which means that games released late in the year are often ineligible for awards or not considered due to voters not having full access (though that didn’t stop November 2019 release Death Stranding, which Game Awards co-founder Geoff Keighley cameos in, from getting nominated in every category it was eligible for last year). That creates a somewhat imprecise dynamic where heavy hitters and late-year hidden gems often fall out of Game of the Year contention.

“Snubs” like that can feel frustrating for gaming fans who want to see small, creative works celebrated in the same way that multimillion dollar projects are. It doesn’t help that The Game Awards has gained something of a reputation for being an elaborate marketing platform for major studios with cash to burn. Award recipients are secondary to the event’s massive “world premieres” that dominate headlines for days to come. This year, it’s more likely that gaming Twitter will be buzzing over Dragon Age 4 rather than whatever takes home the prize for Best Art Direction.

Oscars provides example

Any skepticism over the show’s close ties to major studios and how that plays into its awards dynamics is valid. The show’s success rests on its ability to get unprecedented access from the biggest gaming companies in the world. That’s what draws viewers in and makes it a can’t-miss event. And fans can’t be blamed for leaning into conspiracy territory when millions of dollars are at stake.

This isn’t just a problem with the Game Awards or even the video game industry as a whole. The Oscars are subject to the same scrutiny, as the show relies on Hollywood star power to bolster its ratings. Part of what made Parasite’s surprise victory at this year’s Oscars feel so cathartic was it showed that less traditional films outside of a rigid Hollywood structure can actually get the recognition they deserve after all.

While the deck seemingly feels stacked against smaller studios that aren’t producing ratings juggernauts, Hades could become The Game Awards’ own Parasite if it wins (the game currently has a 93 on Metacritic, tying it with frontrunner The Last of Us Part II). That would be a much -eserved victory for the universally beloved game during a year where indies will have a larger presence on the broadcast than ever before. Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout and Among Us are both smaller titles that are entering the show with fervent fan support that could see them upsetting mega-franchises like Call of Duty.

It’s hard to apply much meaning to something as subjective as awards, but there’s a symbolic weight attached to any powerful institution like The Game Awards, for better or worse. Statement wins could both give indie games a kind of high-profile recognition that often eludes them, while reestablishing the Game Awards’ credibility as an even playing field for games at every level. Though above all else, Hades deserves a win because, well, it’s just that good.

Whatever happens, it’s sure to be a talking point, so tune in to The Game Awards tonight at 4 p.m. PT to catch what all the fuss is about.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Giovanni Colantonio
Giovanni Colantonio
Section Editor, Gaming
Giovanni is a writer and video producer focusing on happenings in the video game industry. He has contributed stories to…
The ‘Indie’ label is losing its meaning, and that’s a big problem for gaming
Dave swimming near a dolphin confused.

"Indie" isn't a new or unique term exclusive to gaming. Music and film in particular have had decades of independent productions that occasionally break through into mainstream success. Indie games have, of course, been around since the advent of the medium itself, but only really came to prominence to the wider public in the late 2000s and early 2010s when digital distribution started becoming a major player. Just like in music and film, indie games drew attention based on that label which implied to the audience that what they were looking at was the work of a small, passionate team not beholden to the same corporate mandates as traditional games. What they lacked in budget and scope, they made up for in heart and fresh ideas.

In 2023, that term is losing its meaning. Indie is quickly becoming a loose word used to describe a type of game rather than the actual environment in which it was made -- something that's fueling a controversy at this year's Game Awards. With 'indie' being tossed around more loosely by players and gaming institutions alike, we're starting to lose what made the word meaningful in the first place: it helped provide a spotlight for games made by passionate teams without the means or money to get mainstream attention.
Fishing for attention
This indie debate picked up a lot of attention this week due to the recently released nominations for The Game Awards. Specifically, debates arose after Dave the Diver was nominated for Best Indie. Dave the Diver was developed by Mintrocket, which is owned entirely by Nexon, a multibillion-dollar South Korean publisher. That's hardly what one thinks of when they hear the term "indie," but it was an easy mistake to make on its surface. The creative, small-scale game features a pixel art style that's usually reserved for indies these days and is an experimental genre mash-up we expect from games like Slay the Spire.

Read more
The Game Awards could use some new categories, so we made them ourselves
1K looks at a cliff in The Talos Principle 2.

The Game Awards features 24 game-related categories -- and even that doesn't feel like enough every time nominees are announced. Indies and more experimental games are often overlooked as the current categories reward the biggest AAA action-focused titles. Geoff Keighley has stated that he constantly assesses which award categories should be present at The Game Awards, but the only major addition recently was Best Game Adaptation in 2022.

There are entire genres and types of games that can feel ignored every year during The Game Awards. This year, we decided to come up with a few new categories of our own, highlight some potential nominees that we think would be worth nominating for these categories if they were to have existed this year, and explain why each category deserves to be added to the Game Awards.
Best Puzzle Game

Read more
This year’s biggest Game Awards snub is this can’t-miss shooter
El Paso, Elsewhere's main character leans on the hood of a car.

After months of anticipation, The Game Awards 2023 nominees were all revealed on Monday. While there will always be debates over what should and shouldn't have made the cut, there is one pretty glaring omission for me. This year's show snubbed one of the best indie games of the year: Strange Scaffold’s El Paso, Elsewhere.

Released for PC and Xbox on September 26, this indie is a narrative-focused action game inspired by games like Max Payne. While it looks like a thrilling shooter that’ll make you feel like a badass on the surface, it also tells a more compelling story about relationships and abuse. It’s one of the best games of the year and now something that might go very overlooked by general audiences as it’s not nominated at The Game Awards 2023. If you haven’t given it a shot yet, I urge you to check it out before the end of the year.
One of the year’s best
El Paso, Elsewhere's old-school third-person shooter gameplay might seem derivative at first glance, but it actually takes the formula those classic Max Payne games established and executes it better than it ever has been. The game intuitively makes me feel like a badass whenever I walk into a room and take some enemies down during a slow-motion dive. Still, players can’t ever go in completely guns-blazing, as each weapon has limited ammo. That makes each level a delicate ballet of dodging enemies and switching between guns, and that only intensifies with each new level.

Read more