When OnLive first grabbed a soapbox at last year’s Game Developer’s Conference and told the world it would bring high-end gaming performance to even the most meagerly equipped PCs, Nvidia execs must have seen their jobs flash before their eyes.
Or maybe chuckled to themselves.
As promising as the company’s remote rendering technology seems now that it has passed further into development, I still see no foreseeable future where neon-lit, heat belching gaming rigs will fade into obscurity. But within a few years, the more accessible casual and console segments of the gaming markets might need to make room for the newcomer. Here’s why.
With the beta well under way, the pitfalls that critics initially predicted for OnLive outside of controlled demos have finally bubbled to the surface in the real world. As PC Perspective’s Ryan Shrout reported when he got a crack at the closed OnLive beta, playing a game on a computer thousands of miles away or on your own computer just don’t feel the same. Mouse and keyboard lag are too apparent in first-person shooters like Unreal Tournament 3 to have an enjoyable gaming experience, and graphics clearly suffer from all the compression used to pass them back from the render farms. For a crowd of gamers who scoff at even the almost-imperceptible delay from a wireless mouse, and spend hundreds on hardware to increase detail on the reflection in a pool of alien blood, neither will fly.
Even if OnLive can somehow work out the kinks – a dubious assumption, considering bandwidth woes mostly lie outside their control – most hardcore PC gamers will never want to give up control of the game experience to an inaccessible server. A cloud gaming experience means no more mods, cheats, hacks, or even playing when the Internet is dead.
Right now, the client can’t even work on Wi-Fi or handle Intel Atom processors with Nvidia Ion graphics, so kiss any thought of playing Crysis Warhead on your netbook at the airport goodbye.
The good news: Shrout reports that less control-sensitive games like Burnout Paradise and Tom Clancy’s H.A.W.X. played passably, and using a Xbox controller further insulated him from the perception of lag. That makes OnLive sound like a great next-generation platform for casual gaming. No more simple 2D Bejeweled Twist at work – OnLive will let you fire up full 3D games that would never run on your dust-choked Vostro. And Mom could still dabble with The Sims 3 on her Emachine.
That means the console market OnLive will target with its standalone box still looks viable, even as the technology’s shortcomings have been laid bare. Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and Wii owners are all already accustomed to wireless controller delay and clumsy analog controls which help mask other lag, can’t modify their games, and play games from a distance on big-screen displays that help to mask compression artifacts and other nitpicky visual details.
High-end PC hardware companies can breathe easy, but Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo might want to watch their backs.
Editors' Recommendations
- Square Enix just set a new bar for video game demos with its latest RPG
- Helldivers 2 and Nightingale expose the issues all live service games face
- In a sea of live service games, I miss the days of regular old multiplayer modes
- Forget live service. Great DLCs kept us playing old games in 2023
- The best third-party video game controller is about to get even better
