Skip to main content

Five reasons Netflix may become the bargain bin of streaming services

Netflix Streaming

Netflix is the most popular “Internet subscription service for enjoying movies and TV shows” in the world. Historically, Netflix has been a forward-thinking company. It was first to the DVD-by-mail business 12 years ago, stealing a good chunk of Blockbuster Video’s customers. A few years ago it took that vision to a new level by launching an instant streaming service as its competitors laughed at the idea. It secured thousands of movies and TV shows and made its service available on almost every movie player, smartphone, set-top box, and video game console available. Since 2009, its subscribers have doubled from 10 million to more than 20 million today, and growing fast.

For the last decade, Netflix has been one of the savviest companies around, but does it have a plan for the next 10 years? Netflix is facing an onslaught of problems, any one of which could ruin the streaming company if it doesn’t have a counter-strategy. Does Netflix have a plan to float above, and remain the go-to service for all of your movie and TV needs, or will it drown in the sea of streaming content slowly rising around it? Here are five of the biggest challenges facing the king of streaming today.

Old, dated streaming content

People are flocking toward Netflix’s Instant Streaming service. Indeed, even Netflix calls itself an “Internet subscription service” now. Currently, it offers nearly 12,000 movies and TV show seasons, which is more than double the number of titles its newest competitor, Amazon, is offering. However, a good portion of this content is old, widely available elsewhere, or crappy (not well-recieved by critics or the market) — sometimes all three. Where it relates to content quality, I am speaking broadly, but the fact remains that Netflix does not get a majority of new DVD releases on its streaming service, nor can it stream the vast majority of archived movie and television content readily available on DVD.

New content is being added. Yesterday, Netflix signed a deal with CBS to add a number of older TV series including Frasier, Family Ties, Cheers, The Twilight Zone, The Andy Griffith Show, Medium (recently cancelled), Flashpoint, and Twin Peaks. Unfortunately, this deal doesn’t appear to include old or new seasons of current CBS hit shows like How I Met Your Mother, The Big Bang Theory, The Amazing Race, The Late Show, or any of the 20 CSI shows currently airing. The streaming company inked similar deals with Disney-ABC and NBC Universal. Few of these deals include new or current-season programming.

Netflix Selection

Save its major deal with Epix to stream select new DVD releases from Paramount, Lionsgate, and MGM, movie deals have largely been for archived content as well. Most major distributors seem willing to offer some major films on Netflix, but their selections seem random, at best. Hollywood has been hesitant to offer much of its premium content before it knows exactly how much it is worth. Netflix’s problem: Fresh content may be cost more than the streaming company can afford under its current business model.

Starz may be the first major content loss for Netflix. In Oct. 2008 Netflix signed a deal to stream Starz movies. The deal added about 2,500 titles to Netflix’s library, including the majority of its best offerings. Recent Starz movies added to Netflix include The Sandlot, The Karate Kid, The Fast and the Furious, Julie & Julia, and Pixar’s Up. However, the Netflix-Starz deal ends sometime in 2011 and Starz is going to want a lot more money for its content this go-round. Will Netflix be able to afford the possible billion dollar price tag (the price it paid for Epix content over five years)? If so, how many of these content deals can it truly justify? It will bankrupt the company to buy streaming rights to every title it currently offers on DVD.

DVDs are dying

Currently, the massive gaps in Netflix’s Internet Streaming service can be augmented by the more than 100,000 DVDs available in its DVD-by-mail library. In the DVD world, Netflix is still competitive. It gets DVDs about a month after they hit store shelves, but nearly every new TV and film release is available, as is almost every old piece of content you could imagine. But DVDs are on the outs. Sales are dropping steadily and consumers are consistently moving toward Internet downloading and streaming services instead of physical discs. It will not happen overnight, but DVD-by-mail is becoming a service few will bother paying for. Netflix itself has realized this trend; the company has been distancing itself from physical media, adding a streaming-only subscription plan for $7.99 last November.

While its reasonable for Netflix to abandon DVDs, those who opt for streaming-only are trading convenience for access to only 10 percent of Netflix’s content. Studies show that Netflix customers are very happy with their streaming services right now, but its likely that most of them haven’t tapped through the 12,000 or so streaming titles available. Over time, Netflix will lose out on business if it doesn’t find a way to make available the 90,000-ish movies and TV shows that are exclusive to physical media right now. There will always be people willing to pay to access a pool of movies, but many people will want to know that they’re favorite TV shows and movies are available. This pressure will increase as competitors emerge.

Poor promotion of available content

Movie collections: We’ve established that Netflix will need to bolster its library of stream-able titles if it hopes to become more than a bargain bin for old content. However, simply obtaining new movies isn’t enough. Netflix has no method for promoting new content. Sure, it has a “new releases” section and Starz has its own tab in browsers, but the company relies on the strength of its movie recommendation engine to do the majority of work for it. While it is a good engine, this is a mistake. Netflix needs to do a better job of promoting its premium content offerings. Currently, titles hit the “new releases” section for a while and then disappear into the fold. The Criterion Collection is a good example of content lost in the Netflix archive. The collection includes more than 150 classic films by renowned filmmakers including Jean-Luc Godard, Akira Kurosawa, Terry Gilliam, Luis Bunuel, Frederico Fellini, Wes Anderson, Alfred Hitchcock, and Charlie Chaplin.

Last week, the Criterion Collection abandoned Netflix for Hulu. Why? The company explained the departure in a Facebook post. “It has never been easy to find Criterion movies on Netflix — ‘Criterion’ is not even a searchable term there. Compare that with Hulu’s willingness to develop a whole area of their site around us, brand the films associated with us, and develop the capability to show many of our supplements alongside our films.”

Granted, the Criterion Collection is mostly a collection for film enthusiasts, but Netflix did not even have a proper profile page for it. Hulu offers a better value for content holders like Criterion. With Hulu, Criterion gets a profile page, can be featured in various sections of the site, can release clips, and can likely collect ad revenues for those who stream its content on Hulu or Hulu Plus.

Netflix SNL pageEpisodic TV: It gets worse. Because Netflix was built with DVDs in mind, it isn’t currently equipped to properly bundle TV shows. In its NBC deal last September, Netflix gained the rights to stream new episodes of Saturday Night Live a day after they aired. A quick check on the SNL Season 36 page of Netflix shows that this deal did indeed go into effect, but I’ve been using Netflix for months and never knew it offered new episodes of anything. Unless you search out SNL specifically and stumble into the Season 36 page, you would never know Netflix had new episodes of SNL. Because Netflix still groups all of its TV shows into seasons and doesn’t have pages for each episode, it’s impossible for the service to properly notify its users that a new episode has been added to the service. There also isn’t a proper landing page for all of Saturday Night Live. A search will bring you the option to show all of the seasons, but they are laid out like a group of DVDs. The Netflix DVD-display model works when looking at a bunch of movies, but it is ineffective when searching for episodic programming.

Netflix does have profile pages for movie stars like Alec Baldwin and other groups of films and shows, but they are only accessible on the PC version of the service (as far as I can tell). Hopefully it will find ways to further leverage collections of films and shows it already has. Why can’t users become fans of a particular director, writer, or movie star? This would greatly improve Netflix’s recommendation engine.

Hulu, a top competitor built around TV, has solved a number of these problems.

No model for premium content

Assuming Netflix can solve its problems with content promotion and episodic television, it still has no way to prove that it is a great place to promote new and premium films and TV shows. While a subscription-only service worked during the DVD-by-mail era, it may not be enough in the years to come. If Netflix wants to have more than bargain bin titles, it may need to invent new ways to bring in revenue for content holders.

Here are a few ideas:

Ads: Hulu offers a subscription service, but it also has a thriving ad-targeting business. Not all content needs to have ads, and the ads should be short and few, but users will put up with a few ads if it means getting new TV shows on Netflix.

One-time rentals: Apple TV offers new TV episodes for 99 cents a pop. Perhaps Netflix could charge a fee to rent certain TV shows or movies while they are in their “new release” phase. Of course, being that subscribers are already paying $7.99 per month, these fees should be cheap and there should be a universal window of time when many movies and TV shows enter the “free” zone.

Purchasing: Walmart-owned Vudu and Apple both offer digital movies and TV shows for purchase. Though I’m not keen on Vudu’s costly DVD prices ($19.99 to own a new movie), the idea is sound. There is currently no way to forever save a movie on Netflix. Often movies and TV shows pop up and disappear (example: Criterion titles). If users could buy a movie on the service for, say, $4.99, and have it forever (or perhaps download it for local use outside of Netflix), Netflix may get many more new releases.

None of these options will make current Netflix subscribers particularly happy, but if the changes were laid out in an affordable and explainable way, it may set Netflix up as the complete destination for streaming movies and TV. Perhaps the company is content being  a $7.99/mo all-you-can-eat buffet. Some people love buffets. I tend to be more selective and would rather pay a bit extra to get what I want. I don’t think I’m alone.

Amazon, Hulu, and the rise of the rest

Netflix was first to the game and is currently the biggest and (arguably) best streaming service. It has proven that people have an insatiable apetite for streaming content. A statistic was floating around late last year that Netflix alone accounts for about 20 percent of Internet traffic during prime time evening hours. The battle between Level 3 (Netflix bandwidth partner) and Comcast over who pays for Netflix bandwidth is proof that the service is immensely popular. However, the water is bubbling under the streaming giant. This week, Amazon unveiled that it’s Amazon Prime free-shipping service now includes unlimited streaming of more than 5,000 movies and TV shows for $79.99 a year. Though Netflix has a larger streaming library, a quick look at the two offerings show a remarkable number of similar movies and TV shows appear on both. Red Box has also announced plans to enter the instant streaming race. Will its all-you-can-eat buffet look the same?

Amazon On DemandAnd those are just unlimited streaming competitors. Netflix also has Hulu, Apple TV, Amazon OnDemand (now integrated with its unlimited streaming offering), Walmart’s Vudu, and Microsoft’s Xbox Marketplace, among others. These competitors are toying with different business models, something that Netflix has resisted.

The Post-Netflix World?

Last December, Whitney Tilson wrote a detailed article describing the problems facing Netflix. While we don’t completely share his dim outlook on the future, it is becoming clear that if Netflix wishes to remain the most popular Internet streaming service in the years ahead, it will need to revamp its platform and approach. Just as the e-book market has millions of free books, every movie and television streaming service will likely have thousands of cheap or free titles available. But the winners in this race will find ways to distribute the 90 percent of movies and TV shows that Netflix is currently ignoring.

This is an exciting time for film and television. Distribution is finally moving to the Web in a big way, new services are springing up every week, content creators are finding new ways to define success, and old media companies are being forced to adapt to the shifting sands beneath their feet. Over the last decade, Netflix has proven to be one of the most forward thinking companies in the world. But we wonder, is it thinking ahead now?

While I’m sure there are people who love to watch Striptease and BBC shows every day, I’d rather watch The Social Network.

Editors' Recommendations

Jeffrey Van Camp
Former Digital Trends Contributor
As DT's Deputy Editor, Jeff helps oversee editorial operations at Digital Trends. Previously, he ran the site's…
Amazon adds Fox TV shows to Instant Video streaming service

The instant streaming subscription wars are beginning to heat up. Today, Jeff Bezos announced in a big letter on Amazon's homepage that he has inked a deal with Fox to bring a large catalog of TV shows and movies to its Amazon Prime instant streaming service. Shows like Arrested Development, 24, The X-Files, Ally McBeal, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and The Wonder Years, which will debut online for the first time through Amazon. This brings Amazon's total number of shows available for instant streaming to 11,000.

"Since launching earlier this year, we have now doubled the number of titles available in Prime instant videos, and there's still more to come," said Bezos. "Prime membership remains $79 a year, and of course features our unlimited free two-day shipping on millions of products. Prime is one of the best values anywhere."

Read more
Netflix divorces discs, now what?
netflix divorces discs now what wii

Video streaming and video rental giant Netflix rocked its world for the second time in as many months on Sunday, announcing the company will be spinning off its DVD rental business into an independently-operating new business dubbed Qwikster. Qwikster's CEO will be Andy Rendich, who has served as Netflix's chief service and operations officer.
The announcement follows on the heels of a controversial restructuring program that significantly raised fees for customers who use both streaming and DVD rental services. In a letter to shareholders (PDF), Netflix forecast the changes would result in the loss of some 800,000 DVD rental subscribers and about 200,000 streaming subscribers.
Explaining Qwikster's spinoff, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings took responsibility for alienating customers and attempted to outline the case for separating the businesses, noting that "companies rarely die from moving too fast, and they frequently die from moving too slowly." But the moves leave several questions: where are Netflix and Qwikster headed in such a hurry, and will customers get whiplash from Netflix moving "too fast?"
The deal for customers
The Netflix-Qwikster split will have a very real impact for existing Netflix DVD rental customers, very soon. Netflix's existing DVD-by-mail and video streaming businesses will be separated into two separate Web sites, with separate accounts, separate queues, separate recommendations, separate reviews, and separate billing. What used to be an integrated experience of browsing both streaming content and material available for rental will become two completely disconnected services. Qwikster will launch with a snapshot of customers' Netflix account data, but from there the services will diverge. Where customers used to receive one bill, they will receive two; if a film or TV series is reviewed on one service, that review will not be available on another service; and neither Netflix nor Qwikster will consider selections on the other service when making recommendations or helping users manage their queues. However, streaming customers will no longer be frustrated searching for content only to find it's only available via DVD (or not available at all): For streaming customers, unavailable content simply won't exist.

Equally importantly for consumers, Qwikster is not changing the recently-increased prices for DVD-by-mail service: an unlimited one-at-a-time DVD-by-mail service will still run $7.99 a month. Customers can add Blu-ray options to their choices for an additional $2 per month, and Qwikster will actually have an option not available under the existing Netflix DVD-by-mail service: video games. Like Blu-ray, users will be able to pay an additional $2 per month to rent game discs for the Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and the Nintendo Wii.
The bottom line for many of Netflix's 12 million customers who subscribe to both DVD rental and streaming services is that prices just increased from a minimum of $9.99 to $16.98 per month back in July. Now, on top of that price increase, the services will be more difficult to use, thanks to separate accounts, separate sites, and separate billing. It's a move that hardly smacks of "innovation."
The deal for Netflix
Netflix is positioning the Qwikster spinoff as the best way to handle the divergent businesses of streaming and DVD rentals. There's little doubt they are different. Where DVD-by-mail needs warehouses, inventory management, mailing services (and the goodwill of the postal service), plus all the paraphernalia of dealing with a business shipping physical goods, streaming is a more-global business that has to deal with data centers, content delivery networks, and software — whether that be for tablets, smartphones, smart televisions, set-top boxes, or old-fashioned PCs. Netflix argues that by separating the businesses, both can innovate separately without worrying about ramifications to the other. "Our view is with this split of the businesses, we will be better at streaming, and we will be better at DVD by mail," Hastings wrote by way of explanation.
Innovating the streaming business will likely mean insinuating Netflix into even more consumer electronics devices, as well as striking new deals for digital content distribution that don't have to be tied to DVD rentals. Netflix has already been forced to grant studios windows of exclusivity on DVD releases, and recently lost its long-term agreement for streaming content from Starz. Separating the streaming business will enabling Netflix to negotiate with studios separately from DVD release windows, and possibly offer new types of streaming availability, like limited release windows or even pay-per-view or per-title rental options for premium content.
Netflix has been operating for 14 years; in that time, Hastings has always been clear that the business he wanted to build was literally Netflix — video delivered online — rather than DVD-by-mailflix. The DVD rental business, although a mammoth success, was just Hastings' leg up until a streaming-only business became a practical reality. Separating out the DVD rental business enables Hasting to focus on what he really wanted to do: create an industry-leading online video service.

Read more
Amazon increases streaming content to over 100,000 movies and TV shows

The streaming video market just got a little more interesting. Amazon announced today that it now offers 100,000 movies and TV shows available for rent.  Sadly of the 100,000 titles available only 15,000 of those titles are in high definition.  In addition to movies and shows to rent Amazon now also has 9,000 titles to stream with an Amazon Prime membership.
Amazon instant offers two drastically different video watching services. The first is a video rental store like Apple TV, and the second is an unlimited streaming option like Netflix. Amazon isn’t the leader in either field, but having both options available is a very powerful combination.
In a head to head battle with Netflix Amazon’s streaming service we concluded that Amazon just wasn’t quite ready to compete with Netflix. The main issues with Amazon’s Prime streaming was the lack of hardware to view the content on, and the lack of content available. Amazon is taking steps to fix both of those problems, and at a price that Netflix can’t compete with.
With all the news about Netflix increasing its prices it shines a light on the value of a Prime membership. Amazon Prime costs $79 a year which allows unlimited streaming of the content, and free 2-day shipping on most Amazon purchases. With one in five e-commerce shoppers using Amazon the Prime Membership pays for itself in saved shipping fees.
It still appears that Amazon needs to bolster its offerings and compatible devices for both its rental service and Prime membership. Amazon clearly is trying to change the landscape of streaming video content and it ultimately will be good for consumers. Having another big player to compete against our current titans of the industry will hopefully help lower prices and increase content for everyone.

Read more