Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. Features

Make better buds! 7 ways true wireless in-ear headphones need to improve

Add as a preferred source on Google
best headphones jabra sport elite
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There’s never been more demand for an awesome pair of fully wireless (AKA “true wireless”) earbuds. Ever since Apple “bravely” removed the headphone jack, (and others followed suit) we’ve essentially been coerced into finding a convenient, dongle-free means of blasting our favorite tunes.

Unfortunately, the vast majority of true wireless in-ears — including those offered by Apple itself — leave a lot to be desired. From awkward form factors and annoying controls to clunky cases and terrible battery life, the first few generations of true wireless earbuds have far too often missed the mark.

Recommended Videos

So, listen up, manufacturers! Below are the seven things we need to see from the next generation of true wireless headphones.

Comfort first

It seems like an obvious point, but any decent pair of true wireless earbuds should be comfortable. This is not the time for designers to go buck wild with jagged edges and dramatic design cues. The ear is full of curvy lines, and great silicone (and even memory foam) eartips have been around for decades. We need true wireless earbuds to provide a soft and ergonomic fit, with good passive noise isolation (we’re looking at you there, Apple).

Truth be told, most of us don’t even really care if true wireless buds are on the bulbous side — like Sony’s WF-SP700N or Bose’s Soundsport Free – as long as they’re comfortable. We’d rather look like we’re on a conference call about to dump some Enron stock than have achy ears after an hour or two of listening.

A decent battery

Yes, battery technology is a problem when it comes to the tiny form factors required by true wireless headphones. Yet, we’ve had flagship offerings that have 5-6 hours of listening time for over a year now. Quite frankly, anything less is a disappointment, and we see far too many true wireless earbuds with 3.5 hours of battery life or less.

Jabra Elite Active 65t review

Jabra Elite Active 65t

The good news is, Qualcomm has come out with a new, significantly more efficient Bluetooth chip for the next generation of true wireless models which claims to double the current offerings. Until then, though, anything below 5 hours is gonna be a no from us, dawg.

Sweat-proofing is a must

The primary reason wireless in-ears are convenient is because we can take them anywhere and wear them while doing anything. That means we’re going to work out in them, get drenched by rain on occasion, or accidentally get splashed while poolside. All true wireless earbuds going forward should be waterproof (and, preferably, dust-proof too).

Turn down the bass

Of course we want true wireless in-ears to sound good, but few of us are buying Bluetooth headphones for their fidelity. That’s what wired-in headphones are for. We’re not sure where the confusion came from here, but heftier bass response is not a solution for mediocre sound. We don’t need every song to blast low end like it was made for the dance floor in Miami. Sometimes, people listen to jazz or acoustic music.

True wireless earbuds should have an accessible sound signature. We don’t need the sound signature to go overboard. Just give us something that sounds decent and — better yet – includes some effective EQ settings.

A case for every pocket

To make up for mediocre battery life in the headphones themselves, manufacturers often include cases that charge the earbuds, which is definitely helpful. However, some manufacturers offer headphone cases that have battery packs seemingly large enough to jump-start a small car. That’s cool in theory, but it’s often super impractical during everyday life.

Bragi's Dash Pro Tailored by Starkey
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

At least half of the population doesn’t carry a purse, backpack, or fanny pack with us everywhere we go. That means, one way or another, true wireless earbud cases are going to be stuffed in our pockets. As a rule, a charging case for true wireless headphones should fit in a normal women’s pocket. If it fits into a pair of women’s American Apparels, it should work for everyone. Make it so.

Cut the flash

We’re buying what is essentially a tool here, not a pair of earrings.

We really don’t care (ok, ok, within reason) what they look like – Apple’s golf tee-shaped AirPods has proven that. They don’t need to be the sleekest earbuds ever or look like tiny bullets that are going to shoot into our skull. They just need to not look stupid.

Make them in white. Make them in black. Heck, make them clear or in skin tones. We don’t care. Just don’t make them in neon yellow, orange, or with some crazy logo on the outside. These are headphones. We just want headphones.

Simple control

After testing dozens of pairs of true wireless headphones we’ve realized that, while basic controls would seem to be an easy feature set to design, they apparently are not.

We’ll start simply: Please stop putting touch controls on true wireless in-ears. It seems like almost every we get an itch, need to adjust a pair of true wireless earbuds with touch controls, or just accidentally put our hand up by our ear, we raise or lower the volume, play or pause the music, or switch songs.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

What we want are buttons. Decent, easy to find, don’t-jostle-the-headphones-or-pinch-us, buttons. Like two or three of them, total. Maybe a volume rocker on one side and a multi-function button on the other. Don’t go crazy. Make them easy to find. Make them easy to press. Make them work in the simplest, most logical fashion.

Parker Hall
Former Senior Writer, Home Theater/Music
Parker Hall is a writer and musician from Portland, OR. He is a graduate of the Oberlin Conservatory of Music in Oberlin…
Stop joining group projects with a blurry laptop webcam and buy one of these instead
Your laptop webcam is sabotaging your first impression. These five can fix it
I'm holding my Logitech C920 1080p webcam in my hands.

The webcam built into your laptop might be good enough for a quick call with friends and family. But its shortcomings become much harder to ignore when you are presenting a semester project, interviewing for an internship, or maybe if you're planning to stream for fun.

Laptop cameras also tend to sit far too low, especially when the computer is placed directly on a desk. Meanwhile, a dedicated webcam lets you position the camera closer to eye level. This improves the framing and brings larger sensors, better microphones, and more effective low-light processing.

Read more
I desperately want a new classic Walkman, but Sony probably can’t give me one
Tech minimalism is begging for a new Walkman. Though rebuilding it may be close to impossible
Sony Walkman WM2011

Every few months, another piece of tech that seems obsolete crawls out of a drawer and becomes cool again. The age of minimalism has revived the popularity of iPods among younger buyers. Dumbphones have become an escape hatch from endless notifications. Similarly, digital cameras are dangling from bags again. Physical media keeps attracting people who want something they can actually hold instead of another frustrating subscription.

All of this makes it the perfect time for Sony to bring back the classic Walkman, which was a phenomenon during the 80s and 90s. I would love one. Give me a compact cassette player, physical buttons, and wired headphones. Keep the apps, notifications, and algorithms that shape your taste of music. No more AI assistants or personalzied feeds, just you and your Walkman. There is only one problem though. Recreating the Walkman that people love and remember, would be far harder than putting an old design back into production.

Read more
Proton reveals how smart TVs track you and the escape situation is pretty grim 
Modern smart TVs fingerprint your screen content at the chipset level.
Google TV applications on the Sony A95K TV.

Your smart TV may know far more about your viewing habits than you realize, even if you rarely use its smart features. In a new privacy explainer, Proton warns that many modern TVs quietly collect data about everything displayed on the screen and share it with manufacturers, advertisers, and analytics companies.

The worrying part is that escaping this tracking is becoming increasingly difficult because many privacy controls are buried deep in settings or enabled by default. Proton argues that buying a smart TV today often means accepting a level of surveillance that most people never knowingly signed up for.

Read more