Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. Entertainment
  4. Web
  5. News

Netflix is becoming (slightly) less of a bandwidth hog, but why?

Add as a preferred source on Google

With Netflix accounting for more than one-third of internet traffic on North American fixed networks, it’s no wonder the streamer is known for being a bandwidth hog. However, a new report from Sandvine indicates that times may be changing. The analysis found that Netflix’s share of internet traffic in the region has declined slightly from six months ago. Meanwhile, its relatively diminutive rival Amazon Video has been on the rise.

For Netflix, the share of traffic decreased from 37.1 percent to 35.2 percent in North America. Amazon Video, on the other hand, climbed from 2 percent to 4.3 percent of fixed traffic compared to last year’s analysis, as reported by Variety. Netflix’s loss wasn’t necessarily a bad sign for the streaming giant, however.

Recommended Videos

In fact, the change for Netflix may have less to do with its relative popularity, and more to do with its innovative technology. Big Red has been employing new video compression tech, allowing it to do more with less, as it were — without degrading video quality.

It’s also important to note that the Sandvine report looks at shares of bandwidth usage, not actual usage. A drop in percentage may mean gains overall, with some streamer’s experiencing greater growth than others. Netflix is still far and away the leader, topping runner-up YouTube, which accounted for a 17.5 percent share of peak-period downstream bandwidth in North America (up from last year’s 15.6 percent).

Overall, streaming audio and video dominates internet traffic. With Netflix and YouTube accounting for over half of internet traffic during the peak period (7 p.m. to 11 p.m., as defined by Sandvine), streaming in general is responsible for 71 percent of evening traffic in North America, and the share is expected to surpass 80 percent by 2020. That’s a good sign for streaming services in general, but it remains to be seen who will take a bigger slice of the pie in the near future.

Looking at the latest results, at least one thing is clear: Our appetite for audio and video content is basically insatiable.

Stephanie Topacio Long
Stephanie Topacio Long is a writer and editor whose writing interests range from business to books. She also contributes to…
Google Home Speaker (2026) review: Smarter and punchier, with a subscription pinch
Google's latest smart speaker pairs Gemini with better sound and deeper smart home integration. What's not to love without spending over a $100?
Sphere, Body Part, Finger

View at Amazon

Quick Recap

Read more
Razer dressed its gaming earbuds for PS5 and Xbox, then priced them surprisingly well
Razer's Hammerhead V3 X HyperSpeed now looks loyal to Xbox and PlayStation. But one pair cheats.
Razer Hammerhead V3 X HyperSpeed for PlayStation

Razer has refreshed the design of its affordable gaming earbuds in Xbox green and PlayStation white. Beneath the matching colors, however, one version has a compatibility advantage. The Razer Hammerhead V3 X HyperSpeed for Xbox and Hammerhead V3 X HyperSpeed for PlayStation are available now for $99.99 each, matching the price of the existing standard model.

The PlayStation edition combines white earbuds with blue Razer logos and a PS-branded case, while the Xbox model uses black earbuds, green logos, and a bright green case interior.

Read more
Your next song could soon carry an AI warning label, and the music industry is all for it
AI isn't the problem anymore. Knowing it's AI is.
AI tag imagined with AI

The music industry's battle with artificial intelligence is entering a new phase. After spending the past two years fighting AI companies in court and pushing back against unauthorized training on copyrighted music, record labels are now turning their attention to something far simpler: transparency. A coalition representing major record labels, artists, and music organizations wants streaming services such as Spotify and Apple Music to clearly tell listeners when a song has been created with artificial intelligence.

The proposal, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, comes as AI-generated music becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish from songs created by human artists. Rather than banning AI music altogether, the industry is arguing that listeners deserve to know what they're hearing before they hit play.

Read more