Skip to main content

Apple exec Phil Schiller sticks to script on day one of Apple-Samsung patent trial

iPhone 5 vs Galaxy S3 angle side by side apple samsung
Image used with permission by copyright holder

With the selection of the eight-person jury taken care of on Monday, the latest Apple-Samsung patent trial kicked off for real in a San Jose, California court yesterday, with Apple’s senior vice president of marketing, Phil Schiller, taking the stand as the tech company’s first witness.

Apple is accusing Samsung of infringing five of its patents, each relating to software features found on its iOS mobile operating system. It’s seeking damages of $2 billion from the Korean electronics company, as well as a sales ban on several Samsung devices including the Galaxy S3 smartphone. A verdict is expected toward the end of the month.

phil schiller
Apple’s Phil Schiller. Image used with permission by copyright holder

According to reports, Schiller pretty much stuck to the script in his testimony, going over the same kind of points he made to a jury back in November during a retrial in another patent case with Samsung.

Using various graphs and charts sporting stats that won’t have looked out of place in one of Apple’s high-profile product launches, Schiller described the success and popularity of the company’s iPhone.

When asked about how he felt when he first set eyes on Samsung’s original Galaxy smartphone, Schiller replied, “It looked so much like an attempt to copy the iPhone.”

He added that Samsung’s alleged copying had “caused people to question some of the innovations we created,” adding, “I think it has confused people as to which products are creating this experience.”

The iPhone maker says it believes that in the US Samsung sold more than 37 million smartphones that violated its patents, and that 10 percent of those are, for Apple, lost sales.

Prior to Schiller’s testimony, opening arguments were laid out by both sides. While Apple pressed home the idea that Samsung had infringed a number of its patents by incorporating similar features into its own products, lawyers for the Korean tech firm argued that the Cupertino company’s damage claims are hugely exaggerated, while the patents relate to relatively minor software features.

The patents at the center of the court case include a “system and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data,” where addresses and times are shown as links within messages, and “unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image,” otherwise known as the ‘slide to unlock’ feature.

[via Re/code, BI]

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
I compared Google and Samsung’s AI photo-editing tools. It’s not even close
A person holding the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Google Pixel 8 Pro.

The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (left) and Google Pixel 8 Pro Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Most phones nowadays are equipped with dual lens or triple lens camera systems and have powerful photo-editing tools baked natively into the software. This means most people have a compact photo-editing suite in their pocket every day.

Read more
The Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Flip 6 release date just leaked
Two Galaxy Z Fold 5 phones next to each other -- one is open and one is closed.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 (left) and Galaxy Z Flip 5 Andrew Martonik / Digital Trends

Samsung is just months away from its next Unpacked event, where it will announce the previously teased Galaxy Ring alongside the next Galaxy Z Fold and Z Flip phones. The event, which could have the most number of devices launching at one Samsung event, is set a couple weeks ahead of last year's event.

Read more
Forget about the TikTok ban; now the U.S. might ban DJI
The DJI Mavic 3 Classic top view in flight

The specter of a U.S. market ban is once again looming over DJI, the biggest drone camera maker in the world. “DJI is on a Defense Department list of Chinese military companies whose products the U.S. armed forces will be prohibited from purchasing in the future,” reports The New York Times.

The defense budget for 2024 mentions a possible ban on importing DJI camera gear for federal agencies and government-funded programs. In 2021, the U.S. Treasury Department put DJI on a list of companies suspected of having ties to the Chinese military and alleged complicity in the surveillance of a minority group, culminating in investment and export restrictions.

Read more