Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Business
  4. Mobile
  5. Web
  6. News

AT&T dodges data-throttling class-action lawsuit

Add as a preferred source on Google

A California judge decided that the class-action lawsuit filed against AT&T for throttling unlimited data will not be allowed to proceed. According to AT&T, customers should only have their complaints heard on an individual basis through arbitration, and it seems as though Judge Edward Chen from the U.S. District Court in Northern California agrees with the company.

Many customers, however, suggest that arbitration would violate the First Amendment right to petition a court for a grievance. Arbitration would allow claims to be brought to the small claims court, but some suggest that the small claims court is not an adequate forum.

Recommended Videos

Chen’s decision comes from a 2011 case, in which the Supreme Court upheld AT&T’s argument for arbitration. According to the Supreme Court, the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a California state law which limits a company’s power to force customers into arbitration.

Customers first filed the lawsuit when AT&T started throttling iPhone users if they used more than 3GB or 5GB of data in one month — even if they had unlimited data plans. The data speeds were far slower than standard speeds, so the customers argue that their unlimited data plans weren’t truly unlimited or useful.

The ruling is a pretty big one for AT&T. It’s unlikely that thousands of iPhone users will file individual lawsuits to the small claims court. Not only that, but those who do take their case to court will have to deal with the legal fees that they wouldn’t otherwise need to pay in a class-action lawsuit.

Still, AT&T isn’t completely out of the woods yet, and will face punishment from the Federal Communications Commission and Federal Trade Commission. The FCC has proposed a fine of $100 million to AT&T, saying that the company violated FCC transparency laws by labeling plans as “unlimited.”

The FTC has also separately sued AT&T for millions of dollars of refunds for customers, and while AT&T argues that the FTC has no jurisdiction in this case, that claim was rejected by the court. Of course, AT&T is still trying to avoid any punishment whatsoever.

Christian de Looper
Christian de Looper is a long-time freelance writer who has covered every facet of the consumer tech and electric vehicle…
I went hands-on with Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. It’s peak foldable in an old garb. 
It may not look like a fresh start, but underneath the familiar chassis, there's plenty of thoughtful engineering tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra

Samsung just wrapped up its glitzy Unpacked event, revealing three new foldable phones and a pair of smartwatches. While my heart flutters for the pocketable Galaxy Z Fold 8, it’s the Ultra variant that truly feels like a refinement. Interestingly, when you look at the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra for the first time, you might mistake it for the Galaxy Z Fold 7.

Both of them look identical, and Samsung has not made any visible changes on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra for it to stand out from its predecessor. Color options, obviously, are fresh this time around, but there are a few changes that have been made under the hood, and they make this phone feel like a practically rewarding iteration.

Read more
Fold 8 Ultra vs. Fold 7: Upgrades across the board, but is the Ultra really worth the upgrade?
From battery capacity to camera hardware, here's a full comparison between the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Galaxy Z Fold 7, and whether upgrading actually makes sense.
Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra vs. Fold 7

Foldables age differently than regular smartphones or flagships. But why do I say this? It's the hinge and the foldable aspect that wins buyers over in the first place, not the specifications that get outdated every single year. That's precisely why anyone still carrying last year's Galaxy Z Fold 7 is asking a fair question today: does Samsung's freshly unveiled Z Fold 8 Ultra genuinely earn an upgrade, or does the Fold 7 still hold its ground?

And for shoppers who skipped last year's model entirely and are weighing their first foldable purchase, the calculus is totally different. A now-discounted Fold 7 might undercut the Ultra by a considerable sum, and that could matter to those looking to spend on the form factor, not the latest specifications. 

Read more
Samsung makes it easier to run multiple apps on Galaxy Z Flip 8’s cover screen
Samsung's Galaxy Z Flip 8 now runs 16 apps on its cover screen.
Galaxy Z Flip 8 cover display

Samsung is finally making the Galaxy Z Flip's cover screen much more useful. With the new Galaxy Z Flip 8, you no longer have to rely on workarounds to access more apps without unfolding the phone. Instead, Samsung has expanded native support on the FlexWindow, allowing 16 apps to run directly on the outer display and also making it much easier to launch virtually any other app.

The update addresses one of the biggest complaints Flip users have had for years and brings Samsung up to the level of rivals like Motorola, whose Razr series has long offered a more flexible cover screen experience.

Read more