Skip to main content

Don’t waste your money on iPhone 12 MagSafe accessories

Apple’s MagSafe Charger costs $39 and the clear iPhone 12 case with MagSafe costs $49. Using these two figures and some quick math, I’m in the position to tell you the total amount of money I wasted  on MagSafe accessories is $88. MagSafe charging seems like a great idea, but it just doesn’t do enough yet to justify this price.

It’s not that MagSafe itself is a poor concept — it’s not. The puck charges my phone admirably, and the MagSafe case will undoubtedly protect my phone to a degree in the event of a drop. However, a few weeks into ownership, I’ve not found a compelling reason to use either, especially over any other similar product, which makes me wonder why I bothered at all.

What’s wrong with the MagSafe Charger?

Nothing is wrong with the MagSafe Charger. It’s a small, well-made wireless charging puck that charges my iPhone 12 Pro very efficiently, and will even (slowly) charge non-Apple phones too. When my iPhone is inside the MagSafe case, it snaps on to the puck with a solid thunk, and doesn’t come loose.

Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

The MagSafe Charger does everything it says on the tin. But all the other wireless chargers in my home do basically the same thing — and none of them require a specially designed case. None of them are sitting at a precarious angle where the phone may slide off at any moment, so MagSafe magnets would be superfluous. And while the MagSafe Charger’s magnets are secure, they can actually be a bit annoying when you have to forcibly remove the phone rather than just pick it up, which is the case with all of my other wireless chargers. I like the green circle that appears on the phone’s screen when the MagSafe Charger attaches, but I’d be lying if I said I’d miss it.

When I place my iPhone 12 Pro on my old 10W Ted Baker wireless charger, I have to be a little careful with the positioning to ensure it starts charging, but otherwise it’s pretty much the same deal. And this also applies to my 10W Choetech wireless charger, which costs about $13. I don’t expect a wireless charger to change my life, but I do have a problem with a new charging “feature” that doesn’t provide any benefit.

Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

How about the case? I’ve already said I don’t like the smooth texture of the plastic, or the additional size it adds to the iPhone 12 Pro. And seeing as the MagSafe Charger’s magnets still work with a slimline case — I’ve recently been using the $26 Caudabe Lucid Clear case, and it’s fine — splurging on Apple’s case just out of a sense of obligation seems pointless.

Think about the way you charge

But the speed, right? That’s what makes the difference? Well, that depends how you charge your phone, and also how much more money you’ve spent. You don’t get a charging block with the MagSafe Charger, and Apple recommends its 20W USB-C Power Adapter to get the best from it, which adds another $20 to the price. Comparable third-party options aren’t much cheaper. If you use a random power brick and its output is low, the charging speed will be much slower.

Don’t think you’ll get away with not buying a charging block at all, as you may not. The cable on the MagSafe Charger ends in a USB-C connector, which doesn’t fit into old iPhone charging blocks you may have hanging around, and USB-C chargers are still relatively uncommon to find packaged with other devices. Factor that cost into your MagSafe endeavors, and it makes even less sense. The tangible benefits don’t warrant $39, let alone $59 when buying at least one new charging brick to make the whole thing work in the first place.

Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Staying with the cable for a moment, it’s a bit short (just over 3 feet), and because it’s fixed to the puck, there’s no easy way to extend it. This is fine if the charger just sits on a table and it’s near an outlet, but less so if said outlet isn’t conveniently placed. It also undermines one of the best uses for MagSafe, and that’s charging while using the phone to watch video or play games, as you don’t have a cable sticking out the side of the phone. With this short cable, you will probably have to sit hunched over an outlet to enjoy this feature.

Finally, if you charge your phone overnight, the MagSafe Charger — and arguably all wireless chargers — provides no benefit over a wired charger. Apple’s wireless charging speeds are slower than its wired connection too, so wired is always the way to go if time is of the essence. I don’t want this to turn into an anti-wireless charging diatribe, because the technology is helpful and convenient, just don’t expect MagSafe to be much different from the other options out there.

Is MagSafe already dead?

Right now, I can’t give you a good reason to spend $39 on the MagSafe Charger, or $49 on Apple’s clear MagSafe case. Wireless chargers can be purchased for less, and perform a very similar job. Belkin’s 15W Boost Charge pad is $40, and comes with a 24W charging brick, for example. You just have to do without the magnets, which unless you live in a little crooked house with a little crooked cat, won’t affect you greatly. And as I’ve pointed out, it may even be a benefit.

Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

What I am hopeful for is the future of MagSafe. Apple’s accessories are always quite expensive, and at the moment, they’re basic examples of what’s possible. Third-party accessory makers are working on MagSafe accessories, and we should see some interesting new products from them in the near future. In particular, I’m waiting for an in-car mounting system using MagSafe — Belkin has one coming — provided the magnetic power has the strength to keep it in place.

MagSafe is a new Apple feature to watch. There’s lots of potential that hasn’t been explored yet, and while there’s no question the magnetic system works really well, you’ll wonder why it’s there at all if you buy the current range of MagSafe accessories available from Apple.

Editors' Recommendations

Andy Boxall
Senior Mobile Writer
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
Why you should buy the iPhone 15 Pro Max instead of the iPhone 15 Pro
Someone holding an iPhone 15 Pro Max outside on a patio, showing the back of the Natural Titanium color.

If you want the best iPhone money can buy in 2024, you have two options: the iPhone 15 Pro and the iPhone 15 Pro Max. They have the same chipset, similar display technology, nearly identical cameras, etc. It's a really close battle, save for the fact that the iPhone 15 Pro is $200 cheaper.

It might be tempting to save some cash and choose the iPhone 15 Pro, but I recommend you splurge for the larger (and more expensive) iPhone 15 Pro Max. Why? Let me explain.
It's a big iPhone you won't hate using

Read more
This one thing could make iOS 18 the best iPhone update in years
The Home Screen on the iPhone 15 Pro Max.

Apple’s WWDC 2024 is just a couple of months away. As with every WWDC, we’ll see what Apple has in store for the next generation of software across its hardware portfolio, including the iPhone with iOS 18.

Rumors have been swirling about iOS 18 and how it will be “one of the biggest updates yet.” We know some features like RCS support in Messages are definitely coming, with other whispers of big home screen customization changes and more.

Read more
This is our best look yet at the iPhone 16’s big design changes
iPhone 15 Pro in Natural Titanium held in hand in front of a cement brick wall.

It seems Apple is prepping yet another design refresh for its smartphones this fall season. In 2023, the iPhone 15 Pro made an aesthetic deviation by serving thinner bezels and titanium looks alongside a new multi-function button. This year, it’s going to be the entry-point iPhone 16 and its Plus variant that are apparently lined up for a design refresh.

Tech commentator Sonny Dickson has shared dummy units reportedly depicting all four iPhone 16 variants, which seem to confirm what previous leaks have predicted so far. On the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus, the camera lenses dance diagonally on a square bump. Apple is reportedly ditching the current camera arrangement for their respective successors in favor of a pill-shaped vertical setup.

Read more