Skip to main content

Is Insidious a better horror movie franchise than The Conjuring?

In an era when franchises are everywhere, two of the most under-discussed come from a very similar creative team. Insidious and The Conjuring have been two of the most dominant horror franchises of the last decade, and both franchises spring originally from director James Wan, who directed the first installment of both franchises.

Wan, who has since gone on to make films like Aquaman and Malignant, is one of the more creative minds working on major movies in Hollywood these days, and Insidious and The Conjuring so the promise he’s always had as a director.

Recommended Videos

Now that both franchises have evolved, and Insidious: The Red Door is set to hit theaters, it’s time to look back on both franchises and determine which one was ultimately better.

Which franchise had a higher peak?

The Conjuring - Official Main Trailer [HD]

Although both Insidious and The Conjuring have had plenty of high highs over their times as franchises, the highest peak of them all is the first installment in The Conjuring franchise, which tells the story of the Warrens, a pair of real-life paranormal investigators who travel to a farmhouse to investigate a haunting there.

The movie is more sharply written and directed than any installment in either franchise, and it’s a high watermark not just for these franchises, but for horror filmmaking in the 21st century.

Winner: The Conjuring.

Which franchise has been more consistently interesting?

The main character of Insidious is sitting in a room looking forward while a scary red-faced demon appears behind him snarling.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Conjuring may have had a higher creative peak, but the Insidious franchise has been more consistently compelling over the course of its various installments. Every entry is compelling for one reason or another, and they all tie together much more cleanly than the much more sprawling Conjuring universe.

It’s worth acknowledging that there have been far fewer movies tied to the Insidious universe than to The Conjuring, but on average, those movies have also been much better than the many properties that spun out of the original Conjuring movie.

Winner: Insidious.

Which franchise has the better cast?

INSIDIOUS: THE RED DOOR – Official Trailer (HD)

Perhaps the toughest question of them all, in part because Patrick Wilson is the male lead in both franchises. Ultimately, this question may really come down to whether you prefer Rose Byrne or Vera Farmiga as your female lead, but outside of the first Conjuring installment, the other cast members in the Insidious movies have tended to be stronger on average.

The very best cast in any of these films is in the original Conjuring, but Insidious catches up by casting well in each of its subsequent installments.

Winner: Insidious.

Which franchise has a larger cultural impact?

Patrick Wilson and Frances O' Connor in The Conjuring 2.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Both franchises have left a legacy behind them, but it’s hard to deny that the stories of the Warrens and everything around them have ultimately had a much larger cultural footprint.

Even just looking at the number of movies that each franchise has spawned feels like an important tell about which one the public has tended to be more interested in. It seems like we may have seen the last of this on-screen iteration of the Warrens with The Devil Made Me Do It, but The Conjuring franchise has now grown far beyond them.

Winner: The Conjuring.

Which franchise has the bigger scares?

The Conjuring Image used with permission by copyright holder

Although we can argue about legacy or casts all day, the one thing most people really care about in any horror movie is how effective it is at frightening you. And, while both of these franchises have offered plenty of great scares throughout their runs, The Conjuring has to win this prize.

The stories in these movies are much more classically horrific, but that doesn’t make them any less effective. Wan knows how to rip the terror out of every moment, and few directors in history have understood how disturbing the right combinations of images can be. He’s really flexed in both franchises, but The Conjuring’s stories of possession and haunted houses (and dolls) are ultimately more likely to leave you sleeping with one eye open.

Winner: The Conjuring.

Which one is the better horror franchise?

The Conjuring, the best horror movies on Netflix
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It was fairly close, but The Conjuring’s sheer terror, as well as its legacy as a franchise, already ultimately make it the better choice for the better overall franchise.

Insidious still has more stories left to tell, but for now, The Conjuring is likely the franchise you’d pick up first if you could only have one of them.

Winner: The Conjuring.

Joe Allen
Joe Allen is a freelance writer at Digital Trends, where he covers Movies and TV. He frequently writes streaming…
Topics
Scream star thinks the horror franchise has gotten too violent
Matthew Lillard smirks in a video store in Scream.

The Scream franchise has proven to be one of the horror genre's most enduring properties. In the nearly 30 years since it began, the series has produced six films and a spinoff TV show that lasted three seasons on MTV. Across its various sequels and spinoffs, the franchise hasn't deviated all that much from its original formula of meta jokes, third-act twists, and gruesome kills, either. It has instead tried to consistently elevate the stakes of its stories and the violence of its set pieces.

One of the franchise's original stars, however, seems to think that it went a little too far in its most recent outing. Stu Macher actor Matthew Lillard said as much in an interview with GamesRadar, in which he shared his opinion on the franchise's recent Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett-directed sequels (2022's Scream and 2023's Scream VI) and the news that Scream screenwriter Kevin Williamson will be returning to direct the franchise's forthcoming seventh film installment.

Read more
30 years ago, this sci-fi movie became a minor hit — and spawned an even better TV franchise
Two of the Anubis Guards from Stargate.

Three decades ago, before they had their biggest break with Independence Day, screenwriters Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich launched Stargate into theaters with Emmerich also directing the film. When the movie was released in 1994, Stargate defied expectations by performing well for an October release, even if it didn't earn enough to get a theatrical sequel.

The irony of Stargate is that it was far more successful as a TV franchise than it ever was as a movie. And the movie is good! It's far from perfect, of course. But the things that the film did well paved the way for the television series that followed it, and there wouldn't be a Stargate fandom 30 years later without this movie.
It's a kitschy fusion of Star Wars and Indiana Jones

Read more
Is this 1999 remake better than the original classic horror movie it’s based on?
4 people look scared in House on Haunted Hill.

Twenty-five years ago today, director William Malone's House on Haunted Hill premiered in theaters. Based on director William Castle's 1959 film of the same name, this horror movie follows an eccentric millionaire who invites a group of people to an abandoned psychiatric hospital and offers $1 million to anyone who can stay in the allegedly haunted institution for a whole night.

Though this remake had the support of acclaimed producer Robert Zemeckis (Back to the Future), it was still panned by critics upon release. Nevertheless, Malone's film premiered at the top of the box office and made $43 million against its $19 budget. Remakes rarely live up to fans' high expectations, but here's how 1999's House on Haunted Hill actually compares to the original movie.
Same story, different execution (no pun intended)

Read more