Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Spotify reportedly in ‘private talks’ to limit free streaming options

Call it the “Taylor Swift effect.”

After much backlash, it appears Spotify may finally budge and give some artists the ability to release albums only to paying Spotify Premium subscribers. The market-leading on-demand streamer reportedly told music executives about the new feature in “private talks,” according to the Wall Street Journal, and explained that its initial roll-out will be a “test.”

Related Videos

Currently Spotify requires artists on the service to offer their music to both paying subscribers, and free, ad-supported (dubbed ‘freemium’) users, the latter of which account for at least 55 million of Spotify’s 75 million active users at last count.

This ‘everything freemium’ model, as U.K. trade publication Music Business Worldwide calls it, has resulted in some blockbuster artists, including Taylor Swift, Radiohead, and many others to boycott the system. Swift has been particularly vocal against Spotify’s freemim policy, calling Spotify a “grand experiment” in an interview last year, and pulling her music from the service.

Most recently, Coldplay allowed only paid music streamers like Apple Music, Tidal and Rhapsody the rights to stream the band’s new record A Head Full of Dreams for the first week after its December 4 release date. The band will, however, give Spotify the rights to stream the record beginning on Friday.

It’s not just artists who have complained about Spotify’s freemium tier, though. Major record labels have advocated against the model, asking Spotify to limit the amount of music that free users can access according to various reports. “Ad-funded on-demand is not going to sustain the entire ecosystem of the creators as well as the investors,” said Universal Music Group CEO Lucian Grainge over the summer according to the Financial Times. On average, Spotify’s paying subscribers bring in nearly 10 times as much revenue as the platforms much larger allotment of free users.

Yet, it sounds like Spotify isn’t fully conceding to artists and record labels yet. The service is still “100 percent committed to our model,” said Spotify exec Jonathan Prince to Music Business Worldwide. “We believe that a free, ad-supported tier combined with a more robust premium tier is the best way to deliver music to fans, create value for artists and songwriters, and grow the industry.”

We’ll keep you updated on how this all shakes out.

Editors' Recommendations

The best live TV streaming services: Hulu, Sling TV, YouTube TV, and more
best streaming TV service

If you're thinking of cutting the cable cord, it's never been a better time, and networking and streaming giants are falling all over themselves to provide the best alternatives for live TV streaming. From Hulu with Live TV to Sling TV to YouTube TV, there are a number of ways to watch televised events live or catch up on your favorite network shows without paying for cable.

Each of these services has its own price tag and list of special features to stand out from one another. However, differentiating between them as a consumer can feel overwhelming. We’ve done our best to simplify the shopping process for you and explain the best live TV streaming services available today.

Read more
YouTube TV: plans, pricing, channels, how to cancel, and more
The YouTube TV on a Roku TV.

When you think of streaming video, you think YouTube. And so YouTube TV — Google's live TV streaming service — very much just makes sense for a lot of people. Designed for those who want to cut the cord and ditch their cable or satellite subscriptions (and known in the industry as a multichannel video programming distributor, or MPVD), YouTube TV competes in the same arena as other streaming television services like DirecTV Stream (formerly known as AT&T TV Now and DirecTV Now), Sling TV, FuboTV, and Hulu With Live TV.

And YouTube TV offers a unique mix of features that make it very appealing, so much so that it's now the No. 1 service in the U.S. in terms of the number of paid subscribers, with some 5 million subscribers as of June 2022 — up some 2 million from the last time the service gave an update in October 2020. The popularity is due to several factors. YouTube TV is easy to use. It's got a selection of channels that's competitive with all its rivals. And the YouTube TV price is competitive, too. You're able to watch YouTube TV on pretty much any modern device. And the fact that parent company Alphabet (aka Google) has been marketing the heck out of it the past few years certainly hasn't hurt, either.

Read more
YouTube TV increases its monthly prices by $8 – is now the time to switch?
YouTube TV on Roku.

YouTube TV has raised the price of its monthly subscription by $8, from $65 to $73. The move comes on the heels of its announcement that it will be adding a multiview feature for sports channels. The change in price will hit current subscribers on April 18, however, the streaming service, which is owned by Google, has already started charging new customers the higher price.

It's been a while since YouTube TV last raised its prices. That was in 2020, when the streaming service increased subscriptions from $50 to $65. When the service first launched in 2017, it only cost $35 per month.

Read more