YouTube’s commenter uproar proves Google’s crystal ball is broken

youtubes commenter uproar proves googles crystal ball is broken

Cesspools of racism, sexism, homophobia, and the kind of sheer idiocy that gives eugenics a good name, YouTube comment sections have long served as an example of what happens when the Web goes rotten. So it comes as no surprise that Google, which owns YouTube, would want to clean up the place.

The shocker here is that Google has picked up one mess only to create a whole new one – one that seemingly could have been avoid using Google’s notorious focus on data, but, for some reason, wasn’t.

No more trolls, no more spam, better “conversations” – sounds good, right? Apparently not.

YouTube announced last week that it has completed integration of Google+ into the video sharing site’s commenting functionality. By linking YouTube comments with users’ Google+ profiles (and thus, their real names), the change is meant to kill off the breed of mouth-breathing trolls that populated YouTube comment threads and spawned in the shadows of anonymity. 

YouTube says it will also make it easier for those who post videos to moderate their comments, and bring highly rated comments, and comments from “people you know” (i.e. people in your Google+ Circles), to the top of the page by default. It also sifts out spam, and lets people turn off replies and comment ratings on their own comments. 

No more trolls, no more spam, better “conversations” – sounds good, right? Apparently not.

YouTubers have responded to the Google+ integration by – you guessed it – freaking the hell out. They don’t like having to sign up for a Google+ account, which can be a major pain. And having their real names and profile photos along side their comments has clearly made calling someone a “newbie fag” a whole lot less rewarding.

In response to the changes, a petition on Change.org demanding that Google bring back the old YouTube comments has racked up more than 90,000 signatures. And Reddit’s YouTube community is entirely consumed by the commenting change, with post after post lamenting it as a major misstep by Google.

Popular YouTube users have also joined in the battle cry against Google+ comment integration. According to a list compiled by redditors, dozens of users with hundreds of thousands or millions of subscribers have blasted the change or simply turned off commenting altogether. Even reclusive YouTube co-founder Jawed Karim, who hasn’t been active on the site since posting the site’s first-ever video eight years ago, came out of the wood work to ask, “Why the fuck do I need a Google+ account to comment on a video?”

youtube-google-plus-comments

Now, we all know that any big changes to heavily used Web products come with some complaining from the vocal fringe. And there are plenty of other YouTubers singing praise for Google+ commenting – really, they’re out there. But given that I – a light YouTube user, at most – have found the changes to be more annoying than the trolls who populated the site’s comment sections says that Google clearly didn’t get this one right. 

How is that possible? Seriously – how can the most data-focused company on the planet push a major update that is so wrought with annoyance that people are virtually taking up arms against it?

Afterall, at Google, “everything is data driven,” wrote Google Developer Advocate Don Dodge, in a 2009 blog post about his move from Microsoft. “Decisions are made based on data that has been analyzed, and going forward everything is monitored and measured based on the data. Opinions and ‘gut feel’ are considered too, but in the end, results are measured by data.” 

So, did the data tell Google the wrong story about its YouTube comment changes, which it’s been rolling out for months, or did someone’s “gut feel” go and muck things up? (Google isn’t talking about the YouTube comment debacle yet, so we are left to only speculate.)

Either way, anyone who relies on Google’s products should be concerned about the implications of this fiasco. Aside from perhaps Facebook, Google has more data on its users than any other firm in the history of the world. But even with all its fancy data-crunching, Google still couldn’t manage to haul away the dung heap of YouTube comments without leaving a crap-trail behind. So, what’s next? Perhaps it will to have Google Search simply scream results at us in the voice of Gilbert Gottfried. People love celebrities, right? 

This obsession with Google+ appears to have led Google to behave about as rationally as Toronto’s adorable crack-smoking mayor.

As for the “gut feel” scenario, that too sounds alarm bells. Last year, former Google engineer James Whittaker wrote a scathing blog post (on the official blog of his new employer, Microsoft), explaining why he left the Internet giant. After Larry Page retook the helm of Google as CEO, he instituted “a corporate mandate called Google+,” wrote Whittaker. “It was an ominous name invoking the feeling that Google alone wasn’t enough. Search had to be social. Android had to be social. YouTube, once joyous in their independence, had to be … well, you get the point.”

We certainly get it now: Google’s sole mission is to impose Google+ on everyone who uses any of its products – that we knew. As my friend and colleague Nick Mokey wrote recently, this obsession with Google+ appears to have sent Google off on a mad tangent, leading it to behave about as rationally as Toronto’s adorable crack-smoking mayor

Whether its faulty algorithms or a sick gut that is causing Google to launch off to social crazy town is anyone’s guess. But, in the words of a YouTuber, the sentiment is the same: “U r sqrewing up.”

Lead image courtesy of Shutterstock/Jean Valley

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect the beliefs of Digital Trends.

Mobile

The Pixel 3 is just another phone. But the A.I. brains inside are unrivaled

The idea that artificial intelligence in smartphones will transform our lives has been heavily hyped, but the reality often disappoints. Google may not know how to make a beautiful phone, but its A.I. features are truly useful.
Smart Home

Google Home Mini vs. Amazon Echo Dot: Which is better?

We put the two most popular smart home speakers -- the Google Home Mini and the 3rd generation Amazon Echo Dot -- together and tested them on appearance, audio, and abilities. So which should you buy? Find out how they did in our showdown.
Product Review

Hotter than a Dot? Google's Home Mini outsmarts, doesn't outperform Amazon rival

With voice match and improved artificial intelligence capabilities, the $49 Google Home Mini is a voice assistant that seamlessly puts the Google platform on the tip of your tongue.
Product Review

Samsung’s quick and versatile Chromebook Pro is the future of Chrome OS

Before the Pixelbook hit the market, the Samsung Chromebook Pro was the first premium 2-in-1 Chromebook of its kind. It's portable, stylus and touchscreen-enabled, and came with the Google Play Store installed right out of the box.
Mobile

No, blue light from your cell phone won’t make you blind

A new study from the University of Toledo reveals the process by which blue light impacts the photoreceptors in our eyes and leads to macular degeneration, an incurable eye disease that causes blindness later in life. The fact that blue…
Computing

Nvidia’s new GPUs look amazing, but that doesn’t mean you should buy one

Nvidia's GeForce 2080 is a powerful graphics card that supports ray tracing to deliver real-time cinematic renderings of shadows, light, and reflection in games, but unless you were already planning on upgrading, you'll probably want to…
Movies & TV

Bored with Netflix? As it goes global, the selection is about to explode

Netflix is going global. And even if you never leave step foot outside America, you should be excited. More subscribers abroad means more original, diverse content, and plenty to watch when House of Cards gets stale.
Wearables

New Wear OS smartwatches have arrived! Here’s why you shouldn’t buy them

The likes of Skagen and Diesel have unveiled new Wear OS smartwatches at IFA 2018. You shouldn't buy them, because they're utilizing an old processor. Qualcomm is expected to announce a new wearable processor next month.
Home Theater

8K is the next big thing in TVs. Get over it

8K is the next big thing in TV. At least, that’s how LG, Samsung, Sony, and Sharp would have it. At IFA 2018, Samsung announced it would begin shipping its gorgeous Q900R series series 8K TVs this year. LG arrived with a glorious 88-inch…
Features

Opinion: Apple needs to modernize its antiquated annual app update routine

While Google updates its core Android apps frequently through the Play Store, Apple saves up core app updates for its annual iOS unveiling. Perhaps it’s time that Apple took a new approach.
Photography

Canon and Nikon’s new mirrorless cameras impress. Should Sony start worrying?

Canon’s EOS R and Nikon’s Z mirrorless systems are coming out of the gate strong, incorporating features that took Sony years to implement and refine. But Sony still has a lead, and may have it for some time.
Mobile

XS Max? XR? Apple’s new iPhone names are a confusing mess

Apple's new iPhone range has the most baffling set of names we've seen in a while, and it's not good news. The phones may be great, but the confusing names shift away from the one brand name everyone knows.
Apple

OPINION: Apple’s new iPhones show off its best tech, and also its greed

We’re just as enamored by the new iPhones as the next person, but with fast charging an extra cost and the removal of the headphone dongle it feels like Apple is gouging us on accessories.
Smart Home

The Google Home Hub doesn’t have a camera. Here’s why that’s a good thing

Bucking the smart display trend, Google's new $149 Home Hub smart display surprisingly doesn't have a camera. We think a camera-less Google smart speaker with a screen is a good thing, and here's why.