Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Photography
  3. News

Nikon’s new 105mm f/1.4 is a stellar performer, according to LensRentals test

Add as a preferred source on Google

Nikon wowed the photography world with the introduction of a 105mm f/1.4 portrait lens earlier this year. The first lens of its type, it combines the flattering compression effect of a telephoto with the super-shallow depth of field of an f/1.4 aperture. And now, thanks to testing from LensRentals, we know that it’s an objectively great performer.

“I don’t get blown away very often,” writes LensRentals’ Roger Cicala in a blog post. “Well, I’m blown away. From an MTF standpoint, this is the sharpest f/1.4 lens Nikon has made. It may be the sharpest f/1.4 lens, period.”

Recommended Videos

MTF stands for modular transfer function, and an MTF test basically reveals how sharp a lens is by measuring its effectiveness at different resolutions measured in line pairs per millimeter (lp/mm). It also measures sharpness from the center out to the periphery of a lens. Therefore, if a lens is very sharp in the center, but suffers in the corners, the MTF chart will illustrate this with a drop in the graph.

With Nikon’s 105mm f/1.4, however, that graph remains almost perfectly straight at 10 lp/mm. And at all resolutions, it outperforms even Nikon’s own 85mm f/1.4G, which is itself a highly regarded portrait lens. Even compared to the older 105mm f/2.8 Micro, which should have a leg up with its smaller maximum aperture, the new 105mm f/1.4 comes out ahead.

Cicala continues: “This is a spectacular performance, especially for a lens type which hasn’t been available previously in any major mount.”

He goes on to pit it against the venerable Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 and Canon’s excellent 100mm f/2.8L Macro. Here, the Nikon holds its own, remaining neck-and-neck with others despite being half the cost of the Zeiss and having an aperture two stops brighter than the Canon.

This is great news especially for Nikon D810 shooters, as the new 105mm f/1.4 should provide ample resolution to meet the demands of that camera’s 36-megapixel full-frame sensor. It’s also great for low light and portraits, where users won’t have to worry about sacrificing sharpness to shoot at a wide aperture. At $2,200, one would certainly hope for superior performance, and the test results show that this lens delivers very respectable results for the price.

Daven Mathies
Daven is a contributing writer to the photography section. He has been with Digital Trends since 2016 and has been writing…
Fujifilm Instax Mini 13 review: This instant camera won me over with its no-frills retro charm
From printing instant memories to rediscovering the fading charm of polaroids, Fujifilm's camera offers a budget route to a simple indulgence.
Fujifilm Instax mini 13 camera.

See at Amazon

Quick review

Read more
Want to try film photography? Kodak’s new $35 camera is a great place to start
This retro inspired Kodak EC35 camera keeps film photography refreshingly simple.
Kodak-EC35

If you've been curious about film photography but didn't want to spend a fortune, Kodak has a new camera worth checking out. The new Kodak EC35 is a reusable 35mm point-and-shoot camera that costs just $34.99, making it one of the most affordable ways to try shooting on film.

Developed by Reto Project under the Kodak brand, the EC35 keeps things simple with a lightweight design, automatic flash, and a pocket-friendly body. It also arrives as interest in analog photography continues to grow, offering beginners an inexpensive alternative to disposable film cameras.

Read more
The FCC’s latest crackdown could put more than DJI drones at risk in the US
Robot, Person, Face

DJI may have found creative ways to keep some of its products flowing into the US, but those efforts are now drawing increased attention from regulators. According to The Verge, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has started cracking down on several companies it believes could be helping DJI continue selling products in the country. These businesses have been described by industry observers as "DJI front companies" because they market or import products that appear to be closely tied to the Chinese drone maker while operating under different brand names.

DJI's alleged back door may be closing

Read more