Skip to main content

Your pictures probably don’t look like you

It’s a common problem in online dating — taking a relationship offline only to find that the man or woman of your Internet dreams looks entirely different in real life. Now, there’s science to explain why there’s such a large discrepancy between pictures and reality — apparently, we’re really bad at picking photographs that actually look like us. According to scientists from the University of New South Wales in Australia, “we are so poor a picking good likenesses of our face that strangers make better selections.” As it turns out, it really is the case that you can’t make a good decision if you’re too close to the subject — and it doesn’t get any closer when you are the subject.

In conducting their study, the results of which were recently published in the British Journal of Psychology, researchers asked 130 undergraduate students examine 10 photos of themselves and rank them based on how accurate they were in terms of likeness. Simultaneously, the students recorded a webcam video of themselves, which yielded two photographs, all done real time so as to provide an “organic” sense of the students’ appearances.

Recommended Videos

And then things got interesting. Sixteen new participants, none of whom knew the original students, were brought in to first examine the webcam videos, then rank the Facebook selfies in order of likeness. 73 additional participants, also strangers to the original students, completed an “online face-matching test using the undergraduates’ photos.” And to cap it all off, the students’ photographs were analyzed by an online facial recognition test.

As it turns out, the images that the students themselves selected were actually 7 percent less accurate representations than the pictures the strangers chose on their behalf. In fact, comparatively speaking, the strangers were better equipped to determine what the students’ really looked like.

In a statement, lead study researcher Dr. David White noted, “Although we live with our own face day-to-day, it appears that knowledge of one’s own appearance comes at a cost. Existing memory representations interfere with our ability to choose images that are good representations or faithfully depict our current appearance.”

“In face-to-face encounters with unfamiliar people, it is often necessary to verify that we are who we claim to be,” White also said. “For example, we are asked to prove our identity when processing financial transactions and crossing borders. In these and many other commonplace situations, photo ID is the most common method for identity verification. However, despite the clear importance of this visual task, previous research has shown that we are quite poor when matching photos of unfamiliar faces.”

So the next time you’re looking for a good photo of yourself, it may be best to let your friends choose. After all, you may not actually know what you look like.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Don’t let your cable company sell you a TV
X Class Xfinity TV

In a matter of weeks, Comcast is going to try to sell you a TV. I can understand if you might be tempted by the idea of no longer needing a cable box to get cable TV. But, I implore you: Don’t do it.

One exception: If you love your cable box -- and I mean if you really enjoy your cable box and its remote control and can’t imagine how you could ever watch TV without them -- then maybe go ahead and buy one of the TVs they’ll be hawking.

Read more
It’s official: You don’t need to spend more than $100 on true wireless earbuds
Sennheiser CX 400BT

Two years ago, if you wanted a set of true wireless earbuds with features like active noise cancellation (ANC), transparency mode, wireless charging, great battery life, and great sound quality, you were looking at spending at least $180, but probably closer to $250-$300. But time has a funny way of leveling the playing field and nowhere has that been more true than in the true wireless earbuds market.

Today, you’ll still pay upward of $250 for the very best models from top-tier brands like Sony, Bose, Apple, and Jabra, but you no longer have to do that just to get access to leading-edge features. In fact, the latest cohort of true wireless earbuds priced around $100 is so good, most people won’t benefit by spending more. You may not recognize the brands, but don’t let that stop you. I've had hands-on (and ears-on) time with each of these earbuds, and they won't disappoint. Let’s take a quick look at some of the features that are most in-demand, and how much you need to spend to get them.
Active noise cancellation (ANC)

Read more
Ikea’s $199 Symfonisk Picture Frame Speaker lets you hang your tunes on a wall
Ikea Sonos Symfonisk Picture Frame Speaker

Ikea's third collaborative project with Sonos under the Symfonisk brand is the $199 Symfonisk Picture Frame Speaker, a 22 by 16-inch rectangular Wi-Fi speaker that can be hung in portrait or landscape orientation on a wall, or sat freestanding on a flat surface. It goes on sale at Ikea-usa.com and in stores on July 15. At that time, buyers will be able to choose between black or white frame colors, and a dark grey or light grey geometric print as the speaker grille/artwork. Two additional print options will be available at launch for $20 each.

In typical Sonos fashion, there has been no discussion of the Picture Frame Speaker's power in terms of watts. Instead, the company describes it as "room-filling" -- a term it uses for many of its speakers. Sonos put a focus on the architecture of the speaker, specifically the design of the tweeter. It uses a special diffuser to help high-frequency sounds spread out around a room.

Read more