Skip to main content

Cambridge study finds that celebrity Twitter accounts act like bots

It doesn’t take much to imagine that, beneath their fancy clothes and sun-tanned skin, many celebrities are actually androids. Their plastic smiles practically give it away. That may be hard to prove but a new study out of the University of Cambridge lends the idea some support — apparently celebrity Twitter accounts behave a lot like bots.

“When I first scraped through Twitter data I found automation,” Zafar Gilani, a Cambridge PhD student who led the research, told Digital Trends. “I immediately wanted to see if bots exist on our social platforms because, if they do, that opens up a whole array of questions. What are they doing? Who created them? Are they bad? How do they impact our lives?”

To identify the Twitter bots, Gilani and his team used Botometer, which analyzes a Twitter account’s data in search of bot-like activity. To their surprise, they found the system to be imprecise, so they took a manual approach and instead asked undergraduate students to review accounts, looking out for bot-like signals such as account creation date, the type of content posted, and tweet frequency.

The students analyzed a total of 3,535 accounts, determining that 1,525 were bots and 2,010 we humans. From there, the researchers created an algorithm that uses 21 features to pinpoint bots. Applying their algorithm to Twitter, they were able to identify bots with roughly 86 percent accuracy.

There are some clear signals that can be used to spot bots, such as the number of tweets from a given account. Gilani and his team discovered that “celebrity” accounts with ten million or more followers share some of these features.

“Bots typically tweet a lot and upload content … in order to gain attention of their audience,” Gilani said. “Celebrities too do exactly that, but instead of uploading depersonalized content, like bots do, they upload and share content and news from their daily lives.”

For Gilani, it’s not much of a surprise that celebrity accounts act in bot-like ways. Indeed, seen from another perspective, perhaps it’s the bots that behave like celebrities.

“Bots exist, and they evolve, just like humans do, because we create them,” Gilani said. “They behave — good or bad — as humans do. They are a manifestation of our online lives.”

Editors' Recommendations

Dyllan Furness
Dyllan Furness is a freelance writer from Florida. He covers strange science and emerging tech for Digital Trends, focusing…
Twitter’s misinformation problem will never disappear as long as bots exist
twitter misinformation bots regulation twitterbot illustration 200603

Over the past few weeks, Twitter has been stepping up its efforts to fight misinformation and prevent it from spreading on the platform. This initiative made headlines when Twitter decided to fact-check a tweet from the President of the United States -- a move that sparked both praise and outrage, and ultimately led to an executive order from the White House.

But while Twitter has earned plaudits for calling out Trump’s verifiably false statement about mail-in ballots and voter fraud, there is no dancing around the fact that Twitter's misinformation runs much deeper than a few high-profile tweets. The most prolific and problematic peddler of misinformation on the platform is the massive army of bots that pose as average users.
Lots and lots of bots

Read more
Bot or not? A.I. looks at Twitter behavior to sort real accounts from fake
Hand holding a Twitter phone

For the past several years, there’s been heightened concern about the impact of so-called bots on platforms like Twitter. A bot in this context is a fake account synonymous with helping to spread fake news or misinformation online. But how exactly do you tell the difference between an actual human user and a bot? While clues such as the use of the basic default “egg” avatar, a username consisting of long strings of numbers, and a penchant for tweeting about certain topics might provide a few pointers, that’s hardly conclusive evidence.

That’s the challenge a recent project from a pair of researchers at the University of Southern California and University of London set out to solve. They have created an A.I. that’s designed to sort fake Twitter accounts from the real deal, based on their patterns of online behavior.

Read more
A huge number of tweets denying climate change came from bots, study finds
Hand holding a Twitter phone

In the days leading up to President Donald Trump’s announcement that he intended to leave the Paris climate agreement, Twitter bots flooded the platform with disinformation and rallies of support, according to a study released to The Guardian.

The study, which was conducted by Brown University and has yet to be released, surveyed nearly 7 million tweets on the topic of climate during the days leading up to June 1, 2017. Researchers found nearly a quarter of the tweets in support of Trump’s decision came from bots -- automated tools designed to carry out specific tasks. Bots have the ability to like, retweet, direct message, and spread disinformation under the guise of humanity. Deciphering whether an account is a bot can often be deceiving, and bots have been a longtime problem for Twitter: It suspended more than 70 million fake accounts in May and June 2018 alone.

Read more