Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Android
  4. Apple
  5. Mobile
  6. News

EU advocacy group expresses concern over WhatsApp’s data-sharing policy

Add as a preferred source on Google

WhatsApp, the Facebook-owned messaging service, is in regulatory hot water. In a letter undersigned by all 28 bloc members of the European Union’s Article 29 Working Party, the EU’s consumer protection authority expressed “serious concerns” over a new data-sharing arrangement with parent company Facebook that will see users subjected to targeted advertising. It has requested that the messaging platform temporarily halt the policy’s implementation until the advisory group completes a preliminary investigation.

At fault is a far-reaching change in WhatsApp’s terms of service. When Facebook acquired the messaging platform for $19 billion in February 2014, it promised not to collect personal data. But in August, WhatsApp informed users it would begin sharing phone numbers, photos, online statuses, profile names, and more with the social network with Facebook, information the parent company said it would use to improve the quality of display advertisements across its portfolio of mobile and web products.

Recommended Videos

The Article 29 group’s principal concern is the apparent inability of some WhatsApp users to opt out of the new policy. Account holders who have not accepted the new terms can decline to agree within the app, but those who already acquiesced have 30 days to change their minds.

The EU alleged that, in enrolling most WhatsApp users in the new policy by default, the Facebook was effectively sidestepping legal disclosure. Furthermore, it contended that WhatsApp users in Europe were not properly notified of the policy change, that they had no way to consent to it, and that the process of opting out was not transparent — practices that “created great uncertainty among users and non-users of the service,” the Article 29 group wrote.

Opting out of the policy is performed in the WhatsApp app from within the settings menu. Users who have not yet agreed to the updated policy and do not wish to do so can tap the “Read More” button on the popup that appears and untick the box labeled “Share my WhatsApp account information with Facebook.” Users who have accepted the terms can alternatively you can open the WhatsApp settings menu and toggle the “Share my account info” button.

A WhatsApp spokesperson told Engadget that it had “constructive conversations” with EU authorities, even prior to the change in policy and that it is “committed to respecting applicable law.” It declined, however, to comment on the Article 29 group’s request that it cease the collection of WhatsApp user data.

The EU is not the only advocacy group that has cried foul. In the United States, consumer privacy group Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) registered a complaint against Facebook with the Federal Trade Commission. Regulators at Germany’s Federal Cartel Office, concerned the new policy could lead Facebook to collect data on users without a Facebook presence, ordered WhatsApp to halt the new practice. And an Italian antitrust watchdog group announced a probe into whether WhatsApp obliged users to agree to share personal data with Facebook.

More broadly speaking, WhatsApp and Facebook are far from the only U.S. tech companies that have found themselves in the EU’s crosshairs. In 2008, European regulators fined Microsoft $1.35 billion for giving its web browser, Internet Explorer, prime placement over third-party competitors. In May, the European Commission reportedly considered levying a $3.4 billion fine on Google for “abusing its dominance of internet search.”

Kyle Wiggers
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
Child abuse material continues to surface on X despite Elon Musk’s promises
New investigation claims several previously flagged child abuse images were found on X.
X-logo

Elon Musk once called removing child sexual abuse material from X his top priority. Yet new investigations suggest the platform still struggles to keep known abusive content offline. Reviews by The New York Times and the Canadian Center for Child Protection found previously flagged material on X, while Grok generated sexualized images involving children earlier this year.

Grok generated images involving known abuse victims

Read more
Researchers warn that social media can reveal sensitive details about users
Social media activity can reveal your politics, religion, and shopping habits, researchers warn
Social Media

What you post online is only part of the story. A new review of research into social media privacy warns that platforms and third parties can potentially infer sensitive details about people from seemingly ordinary digital activity, including their political opinions, religious leanings and shopping habits.

The findings, as reported by Techxplore, published in the International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, point to a widening gap between the amount of personal information generated online and the legal and ethical protections designed to safeguard it. The researchers examined privacy breaches, regulatory frameworks, and the responsibilities of both social media companies and their users.

Read more
Instagram scammers are holding creators’ accounts hostage with copyright strikes
Meta’s copyright system is being weaponized against the creators it’s supposed to protect
A person holding a phone with the Instagram app open on it.

Imagine waking up to find your Instagram account suspended because someone claims you stole their content. You might know that the claim is false, but appealing it could take weeks. If you're a content creator, each day offline could cost you money. Meanwhile, the person behind the complaint offers to make the problem disappear for just a few hundred dollars.

According to a new BBC investigation, Instagram creators are being hit with this new online racket. Scammers are filing bogus copyright complaints and demanding payment to withdraw them, exploiting the fact that repeated claims can put an account at risk of suspension. The account owner may still have their password and login credentials, but that does little good when their content or account has been taken offline.

Read more