Scientists say ‘mini-nukes’ could explain why some satellites mysteriously fail

penny machine learning income predictor 30619164  space satellite orbiting the earth
Andrey Armyagov/123RF
Experts met at a conference in Germany last month to discuss the pressing issue of space debris orbiting our planet, warning of an exponentially worsening threat. Dangerous pieces have more than doubled over the past 25 years, according to the experts, who estimated some 150 million pieces larger than 0.04 inches currently orbit Earth.

This week, a team of researchers from Stanford, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the University of Boston have raised another concern about smaller particles that could also threaten orbiting spacecraft. These dust-sized micrometeorites might not fracture spacecraft like some space debris but simulations showed that, upon impact, they produce a pulse of radiation strong enough to disable a satellite.

Recommended Videos

The hypothesis was hatched by senior author of the study, Stanford’s Sigrid Close, who looked into the idea that hypervelocity impacts could be to blame for some satellite failures, roughly half of which remain unexplained. Close and her colleagues used computer simulations to model plasma and electromagnetic fields at the same time, calculating the amount of radiation generated by the plasma during impact.

“For the last few decades researchers have studied these hypervelocity impacts and we’ve noticed that there’s radiation from the impacts when the particles are going sufficiently fast,” Alex Fletcher, lead author and  postdoctoral researcher at Boston University, said in a press release. “No one has really been able to explain why it’s there, where it comes from or the physical mechanism behind it.”

Put briefly, the radio-frequency radiation occurs when a projectile hits an object and converts into a plasma. As the plasma expands, its electrons move exponentially faster than the positive ions creating a current. The more the plasma cloud expands, the more the electrons and ions pulls against each other, oscillating that current. This interplay creates the pulse of radiation, which Close told IEEE Spectrum is like a “mini-nuke.”

According to the researchers calculations, a dangerous pulse could from a femtogram-scale (that’s smaller than nano-scale) particle traveling at just under 11.2 miles per second. Keep in mind that many micrometeorites are many magnitudes larger and travel much faster. The good news is, for one of these “mini-nukes” to really deal some damage, it has to hit in precisely the right (or wrong) spot.

“It sounds scary, but the plasmas are tiny and disappear in microseconds,” Close said. “So you have to be unlucky. You have to have sensitive components close to the impact.”

Nonetheless, for a “failure is not an option” agency like NASA, the study is one which they’ll want to consider.

A paper detailing the study was published this week in the journal Physics of Plasmas.

Editors' Recommendations

Dyllan Furness is a freelance writer from Florida. He covers strange science and emerging tech for Digital Trends, focusing…
Hubble discovers over 1,000 new asteroids thanks to photobombing

The Hubble Space Telescope is most famous for taking images of far-off galaxies, but it is also useful for studying objects right here in our own solar system. Recently, researchers have gotten creative and found a way to use Hubble data to detect previously unknown asteroids that are mostly located in the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

The researchers discovered an incredible 1,031 new asteroids, many of them small and difficult to detect with several hundred of them less than a kilometer in size. To identify the asteroids, the researchers combed through a total of 37,000 Hubble images taken over a 19-year time period, identifying the tell-tale trail of asteroids zipping past Hubble's camera.

Read more
Biggest stellar black hole to date discovered in our galaxy

Black holes generally come in two sizes: big and really big. As they are so dense, they are measured in terms of mass rather than size, and astronomers call these two groups of stellar mass black holes (as in, equivalent to the mass of the sun) and supermassive black holes. Why there are hardly any intermediate-mass black holes is an ongoing question in astronomy research, and the most massive stellar mass black holes known in our galaxy tend to be up to 20 times the mass of the sun. Recently, though, astronomers have discovered a much larger stellar mass black hole that weighs 33 times the mass of the sun.

Not only is this new discovery the most massive stellar black hole discovered in our galaxy to date but it is also surprisingly close to us. Located just 2,000 light-years away, it is one of the closest known black holes to Earth.

Read more
Watch how NASA plans to land a car-sized drone on Titan

 

A decision by NASA this week paved the way for the Dragonfly drone mission to continue to completion.

Read more