Skip to main content

The FBI wants to know your internet browsing history

First it was the data in smartphones, and now it’s your browser history — the FBI wants it all. The Obama administration wants to allow the FBI to access a person’s internet browsing history and other data in spy and terrorism cases.

FBI Director James Comey is advocating for amending the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, ECPA, to force tech firms to provide this browsing data — current language allows these companies to refuse demands for data. But Comey wants to fix this and allow special agents to issue National Security Letters. NSLs do not require a judge’s approval, and the FBI could use them to demand “electronic communication transactional records,” or ECTRs. Holy acronyms, Batman.

Recommended Videos

But the data the FBI seeks doesn’t include the content of the sites you visit — just the protocol address and how much time you spend on a particular website. For example, if you visit Digital Trends’ website, authorities would only see digitaltrends.com and for how long you stayed on the site. They wouldn’t be able to tell if you clicked into specific parts of the site, according to the Washington Post.

Regardless, Silicon Valley, along with various privacy and civil rights organizations, aren’t taking this lightly. Dubbed the “ECTR Coalition,” companies such as Google, Yahoo, and Facebook have joined the likes of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union, Human Rights Watch, Restore the Fourth, and more to highlight what the FBI is really trying to do: expand the surveillance powers of the government.

More than 300,000 NSLs have been issued in the past 10 years.

“This expansion of the NSL statute has been characterized by some government officials as merely fixing a ‘typo’ in the law,” the coalition writes in a letter. “In reality, however, it would dramatically expand the ability of the FBI to get sensitive information about users’ online activities without court oversight.”

The Senate Judiciary Committee is considering an amendment this week penned by Senator John Cornyn, R-Texas, to reform the ECPA. And the Senate Intelligence Committee voted on the Intelligence Authorization bill with the NSL amendment. These NSLs issued by the FBI would also come with a gag order, which means companies wouldn’t be able to disclose if they shared a user’s data.

More than 300,000 NSLs have been issued in the past 10 years, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

“The new categories of information that could be collected using an NSL — and thus without any oversight from a judge — would paint an incredibly intimate picture of an individual’s life,” the coalition writes. “For example, ECTRs could include a person’s browsing history, email metadata, location information, and the exact date and time a person signs in or out of a particular online account.”

The coalition goes on to say this data could reveal a person’s political affiliation, medical conditions, religion, substance abuse history, sexual orientation, and even their movements throughout the day.

“Given the sensitive nature of the information that could be swept up under the proposed expansion, and the documented past abuses of the underlying NSL statute, we urge the Senate to remove this provision from the Intelligence Authorization bill and oppose efforts to include such language in the ECPA reform bill, which has never included the proposed NSL expansion,” the coalition writes.

You can read the full letter, with the list of signed companies and organizations, here.

Julian Chokkattu
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Julian is the mobile and wearables editor at Digital Trends, covering smartphones, fitness trackers, smartwatches, and more…
Google Pixel 9 is getting a scam detection upgrade you’ll want on your phone
Google’s Scam Detection for calls on Pixel 9.

Over three months ago, Google started beta testing a new safety feature for Pixel phones that can sense signs of a fraud in voice calls using AI analysis. Today, Google has officially launched the Scam Detection feature for calls, alongside a similar con-screening system for messages.
Every year, smartphone users lose millions of dollars to elaborate schemes across the world. The problem is so rampant that the US Office of Inspector General and the Federal Trade Commission have published guidelines on recognising and reporting such deception.

Hearing calls to flag risks
To look for signs of scam in an ongoing call, Google is pushing the natural language understanding of on-device Gemini Nano AI on Pixel phones. The AI will listen to the ongoing telephonic conversation in  real time, and if it detects a risky pattern, an alert will pop up.

Read more
Careful — this Google ad could swipe your bank data without you knowing
Zoomed in version of Homebrew website.

Using Google ads to push their malicious sites to the top of the results page is a trick cybercriminals use all too often. The latest example is a fake Homebrew website that uses an infostealer to swipe personal data, browser history, login information, and bank data from unsuspecting victims.

Spotted by Ryan Chenkie on X and reported by BleepingComputer, the malicious Google ad even displays the correct Homebrew URL "brew.sh," so there's no real way to spot the trick before clicking.

Read more
Is your Fitbit getting too hot? Google wants to give you $50
Wearing a Fitbit Sense 2 while working at a desk.

Google has issued a warning for the Fitbit Sense and Fitbit Versa 3. A "limited number" of the smart wearables are at risk of overheating with the potential to cause burns, so it isn't every single Sense or Versa 3 model. A firmware update began rolling out yesterday and will continue to do so over the next month, and Google says that affected customers — those with devices at risk of overheating — could be eligible to receive $50 in compensation.

The firmware update will reduce the chance the battery will overheat, but it comes at the expense of capacity. The wearables won't have the same battery length as they once did, according to TechRadar. This isn't the first time Fitbit has run into problems like this; in 2022, the Fitbit Ionic caused several burns and resulted in refunds. There was also a report of an exploding Fitbit in 2017, too, though the company claims it isn't responsible for that incident.

Read more