Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

I’m not buying Google’s awesome Chromecast

Add as a preferred source on Google

Before Google’s press event came to a close on Wednesday, my colleagues had ordered, in total, five Chromecast dongles. Well dang, I need to get in on this, I thought. I went through the various clicks, entered my updated credit card info into Google Wallet. And then … I closed the browser.

Why the hell did I do that? The question still haunts me, as I write this, for reasons my anti-consumerist side thinks deserve professional psychiatric attention. Chromecast is a damn good deal, after all – and it was an even better deal in those first few hours after its debut. For $35, I could have gotten a device that streams YouTube, Netflix, and range of other Web content, directly to my HDTV. At that price, it’s a no-brainer. To sweeten the deal further, Google briefly offered three months of free Netflix. Seeing as I already pay $8.95 per month for a Netflix subscription, the Chromecast would have cost me a net total of $8.15. I spent more on a Chicken McNugget meal last night that made me feel like Ronald McDonald took a dump in my stomach.

Recommended Videos

Okay, you’re still asking, why didn’t you buy a Chromecast? The fake answer is, I don’t really need one. Between my Xbox 360 and my Internet-connected BluRay player, I already have more than enough devices to connect my TV to the primary apps currently offered on the Chromecast. Is typing on the Xbox a giant hassle? Sure, but I like to think it builds patience and character. (It doesn’t – I usually end up screaming at the television and throwing the controller across the room, but I still like to think that.) And besides, it’s always better to be frugal.

The prospect of having full, easy Web surfing capabilities on literally every screen in my house makes me nervous.

No – the real answer is, the prospect of having full, easy Web surfing capabilities on literally every screen in my house makes me nervous.

Like many of you, I spend much of my daylight hours online. The Web provides both my livelihood and my primary connection to the outside world. Because of this, any idle time I have inevitably leads me back to a computer screen, mindlessly clicking my life away – or, more often, working.

To be honest, I actually like clicking my life away, and I really like working. But my loved ones see things differently. “You’ll get burnt out,” they said. “Why don’t you get a hobby?” asked another. “You’re kind of a jerk,” said a few of them – not related to my Internet addiction, but it still made me feel bad. The situation grew so dire that my fiancé actually bought me the Xbox 360 just to keep me off the Web – and you know you have a problem when playing video games is a solution. I even considered attending one of those $1,400-a-weekend Digital Detox camps before I remembered my vow to never get scammed by yuppies.

So out comes the Google Chromecast, a device that brings much of the Web experience to the largest screen in my house. Not only that, but reports indicate that Google may eventually offer cable channel bundles through an Internet connection – meaning the Chromecast may very well be a cord cutter’s dream device. Seeing as my local cable/Internet monopoly hasn’t bothered to run cable TV service to my freakin’ house yet, the Chromecast is only that much more enticing. I mean, seriously – how awesome would real Internet TV be?

And yet, I am determined to maintain self-control here. Don’t get me wrong – this isn’t some Luddite ideal. I don’t actually think the Internet is bad for you in some philosophical or medical way, nor do I have any wild fantasies about going off the grid. Rather, I see value in keeping the gadgets that have come to dominate my life separate. My computer is for work and a little bit of casual Web browsing. My television is for watching some Netflix and playing Borderlands 2. My iPhone is for keeping me from dying of boredom while standing in lines. It’s balanced, compartmentalized, and healthy.

There will come a day when all the devices in our homes, from our televisions and computers to our toasters and light bulbs, will have an Internet connection. (For some of you rich bastards, that day has already come.) And that’s fine. But for now, I am in no rush to expedite the convergence. Instead, I’m just going to take a deep breath, and maintain the blissful equilibrium I’ve established in my life. The Chromecast will just have to … ah, dammit, I just bought one.

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
The Mac Pro nearly received an M3 Extreme chip twice as powerful as M3 Ultra
High production costs likely killed Apple’s M3 Extreme plans
Apple's Mac Pro on a table at a press event.

Apple discontinued the Mac Pro earlier this year, ending a 20-year run for a computer that once represented the very best of the company’s desktop lineup. However, Apple reportedly had much bigger plans for the machine before ultimately replacing it with the Mac Studio.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple developed an M3 Extreme chip that could have offered twice as many CPU and GPU cores as the M3 Ultra. The processor was intended to sit above the Ultra tier and could have finally given the Mac Pro the performance advantage it badly needed. Apple eventually abandoned the chip due to concerns over production costs and limited demand for such an expensive machine.

Read more
Hidden prompts can secretly rewrite an AI’s memory, and researchers say that’s a serious problem
Researchers discover AI attack that rewrites an assistant's long-term memory
Chatbot on a smartphone.

Large language models are getting better at remembering us. Whether it's your preferred writing style, recurring tasks, shopping habits or project deadlines, AI assistants are increasingly storing long-term memories to make future conversations feel more personal and useful. But according to new research, that same feature could become one of AI's biggest security vulnerabilities.

Researchers from New Mexico State University have demonstrated a new attack called GhostWriter, capable of secretly planting false memories inside AI agents. Rather than stealing information outright, the attack manipulates what an AI remembers, potentially causing it to make dangerous decisions long after the original attack has taken place.

Read more
This experiment shows how easy it is to poison an open-weight AI model for under $100
This research raises new doubts about trusting open weight AI models.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Open-weight AI models have been having a moment lately. Just this month, Moonshot's massive Kimi K3 model landed close behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in several benchmarks, all while remaining fully open-weight and downloadable by anyone.

However, Katie Paxton-Fear, a cybersecurity lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University and staff security advocate at Semgrep, managed to poison an open-weight model and proved how easily that openness can be turned against you (via The Register).

Read more