Skip to main content

Intel Settles with FTC – Without Fines

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Technology giant Intel and the Federal Trade Commission have announced a tentative settlement to the long-running antitrust litigation against the chipmaker. Under the terms of the deal, Intel will be be barred from paying computer makers not to use chips from competitors, or from retaliating against computer makers who use non-Intel suppliers. However, Intel will be paying no fines for more than a decade of alleged wrongdoing—although, of course, Intel maintains it has not done anything wrong.

“This case demonstrates that the FTC is willing to challenge anticompetitive conduct by even the most powerful companies in the fastest-moving industries,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, in a statement. “By accepting this settlement, we open the door to competition today and address Intel’s anticompetitive conduct in a way that may not have been available in a final judgment years from now.”

The settlement applies to Intel’s CPU, graphics technologies, and bundles chipsets, and prohibits Intel from using bundled prices, special offers, or even threats to get computer makers to run with Intel gear rather than systems from competitors. Intel will also have to change its intellectual property agreements with graphics developers Nvidia, AMD, and Via Technologies so those companies are more able to enter into mergers or joint ventures, and maintain the PCI Express bus for at least six years in a way that won’t impede development of graphics technologies.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Intel will also have to come clean that Intel’s compilers favor Intel chips and may not use all features of non-Intel chips; Intel will also be barred from deceiving computer maters about the performance of non-Intel processors and graphics systems.

Intel does not admit to any violation of law, nor does it cede that the facts alleged in the FTC’s complaint against it are true: it sees the settlement as a way to put years of antitrust litigation behind the company.

“This agreement provides a framework that will allow us to continue to compete
and to provide our customers the best possible products at the best prices,” said Intel senior VP and general counsel Doug Melamed, in a statement. “The settlement enables us to put an end to the expense and distraction of the FTC litigation.”

Intel will not be paying any fines as part of the settlement; in contrast, the European Union levied a $1.45 billion fine against Intel in May 2009 for many of the same practices, the largest antitrust fine ever issued by the European Commission. Intel continues to appeal that ruling.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AMD didn’t even need its best CPU to beat Intel
A render of a Ryzen 9000 CPU.

Looks like the competition between AMD and Intel is about to start heating up again. AMD's upcoming second-best processor, the Ryzen 9 9900X, was just spotted in an early benchmark -- and the results are shockingly good. If this is what AMD can do with a 12-core CPU, what's going to happen when the 16-core version of Zen 5 appears in tests?

The happy news (for AMD fans, at least) comes directly from the Geekbench 6.2 database, and it all comes down to a benchmark of what appears to be a retail sample of the Ryzen 9 9900X. The chip scored an impressive 3,401 points in the single-core score, and 19,756 points in the multi-core score. That puts it far above its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7900X, but that's not its only success.

Read more
This could be the reason you upgrade your GPU
The RTX 4080 in a running test bench.

Now more than ever, the best graphics cards aren't defined by their raw performance alone -- they're defined by their features. Nvidia has set the stage with DLSS, which now encompasses upscaling, frame generation, and a ray tracing denoiser, and AMD is hot on Nvidia's heels with FSR 3. But what will define the next generation of graphics cards?

It's no secret that features like DLSS 3 and FSR 3 are a key factor when buying a graphics card in 2024, and I suspect AMD and Nvidia are privy to that trend. We already have a taste of what could come in the next generation of GPUs from Nvidia, AMD, and even Intel, and it could make a big difference in PC gaming. It's called neural texture compression.
Let's start with texture compression

Read more
AMD just revealed a game-changing feature for your graphics card
AMD logo on the RX 7800 XT graphics card.

AMD is set to reveal a research paper about its technique for neural texture block compression at the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering (EGSR) next week. It sounds like some technobabble, but the idea behind neural compression is pretty simple. AMD says it's using a neural network to compress the massive textures in games, which cuts down on both the download size of a game and its demands on your graphics card.

We've heard about similar tech before. Nvidia introduced a paper on Neural Texture Compression last year, and Intel followed up with a paper of its own that proposed an AI-driven level of detail (LoD) technique that could make models look more realistic from farther away. Nvidia's claims about Neural Texture Compression are particularly impressive, with the paper asserting that the technique can store 16 times the data in the same amount of space as traditional block-based compression.

Read more