Skip to main content

OLPC Delays Angering Donors

When the OLPC project announced its Give One, Get One initiative last November, enabling supporters in North America to get their hands on an OLPC XO notebook by funding the purchase of a second laptop to be given to a child in a developing nation. The program was met with considerable enthusiasm, so much so that the OLPC project extended the program from its initial two-week window to run out to the end of 2007.

Now, the OLPC is facing a wave of backlash from Give One, Get One participants, who are reporting a growing number of shipping and delivery problems. Although the OLPC project warned that delivery of XO notebooks would be prioritized for children in developing nations and it would not be able to meet orders through the program in time for the end-of-year holiday season, current problems far exceed that scope. An apparent software glitch between Patriot (which handles orders processed through PayPal) and Brightstar (which handles getting units from the manufacturer—Taiwan’s Quanta—and buyers via FedEx) has rendered the addresses of many program participants undeliverable. Donors have had to wait hours on hold trying to correct the information, and some have had to repeatedly call Patriot to make sure their address information is conveyed accurately. Exasperating problems, FedEx won’t deliver to P.O. boxes; this policy was never disclosed to program participants, many of whom unwittingly provided PO addresses for delivery—and making things worse, Brightstar isn’t reliably contacting customers to sort out the problem. Other OLPC donors have complained the organization’s shipping tracking system is not accurate, making it impossible for them to follow up on their order status.

Recommended Videos

The OLPC organization has documented some of the process and issues on its Web site, but the glitches are causing some to question the organization’s ability to deliver millions of laptops to children in developing nations if they can’t get a comparative handful of notebook computers to donors in North America. OLPC is apologizing to its supports, and notes that drop-shipping bulk orders to around a dozen developing countries is somewhat less complex than filling tens of thousands of individual orders.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Nvidia’s AI obsession is causing delays in its PC business
Logo on the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080.

Component manufacturer, Nvidia appears to be short on GeForce RTX 50 series GPUs for laptops, which were originally set to launch in January.

Reports indicate that the supplier has been so focused on developing AI Chips that other parts of its business have lapsed. This has caused delays in supplying the GeForce RTX 50 Series chips to computing partners.

Read more
We now know why AMD chose to delay RDNA 4 — well, kind of
AMD announcing FSR 4 during CES 2025.

AMD hasn't been very forthcoming when it comes to information about its RX 9000 series GPUs, but we just got an update as to why the cards won't be available until sometime in March. The company cites software optimization and FSR 4 as the two reasons why it most likely decided to delay the launch of RDNA 4. But is that all there is to it, or is AMD waiting to see some of Nvidia's best graphics cards before pulling the trigger on the RX 9070 XT?

The update comes from David McAfee, AMD's vice president and general manager of the Ryzen CPU and Radeon graphics division. A couple of days ago, McAfee took to X (Twitter) to announce that AMD was excited to launch the RX 9000 series in March. This caused a bit of an uproar, with many enthusiasts wondering why AMD was choosing to wait so long.

Read more
NZXT dismisses PC rental allegations as ‘misconceptions’ while promising changes
The NZXT H7 Flow refreshed PC case showcased at Computex 2024.

NZXT founder and CEO Johnny Hou has publicly addressed growing criticism of the company’s Flex gaming PC rental program, which faced intense scrutiny after YouTube channel Gamers Nexus exposed significant flaws in its pricing and terms. In a detailed video, Gamers Nexus described the program as exploitative, pointing out that its long-term costs far outweighed the hardware's value, leaving customers locked into a financial commitment with minimal ownership options.

“I want to acknowledge that we messed up,” Hou said in a video published by the company. He also promised to address customer concerns and improve the program but offered few specifics on what changes would be implemented.

Read more