Skip to main content

The second wave of Google’s Panda

It’s back: We’re in the thick of Google’s second wave of its Panda update. And like the first time, it isn’t pretty. The king of search recently reissued the algorithm adjustments for expanded international reach and also included updates as a result of sites users were blocking. “Based on our testing,” the Google web master blog read, “we’ve found the algorithm is very accurate at detecting site quality.” Google also asserted that the second time around would be as severe, affecting about two percent of U.S. queries. Panda originally impacted 12-percent of U.S. searches.

While Google’s algorithm alterations haven’t been as brutal on a large-scale basis, there is no shortage of consequences resulting – and plenty that make just as little sense as the first time around.

Related Videos

Scraper sites persist

We all know the original purpose for Panda was to crackdown on content farms, which at least makes us feel like Google’s heart was in the right place. While Search Metrics recently reported notorious offender eHow had lost significant traffic (despite its protestations), there are far too many examples of the exact opposite. Regardless of any bias, upon searching “Thor movie review” our own review of the movie, which our writer saw at a press-only screening and published at midnight, is buried somewhere in Google’s no man’s land. However, this pops up on page four:

the rpf page four

The RPF is a community and forum “dedicated to props, costumes, and models.” A member of the site posted a link to Gizmodo’s Thor review – the site itself has no such review and also appears in Google’s results before the actual Gizmodo review. HipHopDx also pops up on page four, and the corresponding article is a short write-up and video of Mc Hammer’s thoughts on the film. We also Googled a specific title – and Yahoo, which hosted our article on its own site–popped up ahead of the original article, something we’ve consistently seen not only with our content but many sites’. Using other search engines has not yielded these types of results.

yahoo-digital trends

British invasion

Another anomaly is the amount of U.K. sites getting preference in U.S. searches. British and U.S. video games use different rating systems, so if you want a review of Portal 2, U.K. publication The Guardian is probably not going to be your best source, yet it shows up on page one. We’ve seen this with various video game reviews.

portal 2 uk

When it comes to world news, there are various excellent, international sources: BBC, The Telegraph, Daily Mail, etc. But in some cases only publications based in your country will lead to the desired information.

The Google standards

Google head of search, Amit Singhal, recently revealed some questions webmasters should ask themselves, and while some of them make sense (i.e. “Would you trust the information presented in this article?”) some seem too objective to serve as universal guidelines (i.e. “Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?”).

There’s ample concern that Google’s control over search means that it gets to determine the answers to these questions, many of which can vary widely due to personal opinion. And some sites have questioned the fact that no Google-owned properties have been negatively impacted.

Making the issue even more frustrating is the response – or lack thereof – affected sites are getting. Google is notoriously pro-transparency, until it comes to its search algorithm. Obviously revealing every detail of these practices would result in website-SEO-madness, but various webmasters who have contacted Google asking how they can climb out of the dark hole of search they’ve been banished to have received little to no assistance. Of course there are exceptions, including Overlook, which recently announced Google has finally restored its former rankings.

But paranoia and concern aren’t quite relieved – and they shouldn’t be, considering the amount of control Google has over the world of search.

Editors' Recommendations

The Windows 11 taskbar is getting an important new update
windows 11 taskbar third party app pinning

Microsoft is working on new experiences for Windows that will allow developers to enable pinning for third-party applications, as well as enable pinning to the Taskbar.

Microsoft recently announced the details of these upcoming functions in a blog post. This is the brand's attempt to universalize its pinning process across all apps used on Windows. In practice, it will be similar to how pinning works on the Edge browser, with the Windows 11 users being notified by the Action Center about a request for pinning to the Taskbar by the app in question.

Read more
GPT-4: how to use, new features, availability, and more
A laptop opened to the ChatGPT website.

ChatGPT-4 has officially been announced, confirming the longtime rumors around its improvements to the already incredibly impressive language skills of OpenAI's ChatGPT.

OpenAI calls it the company's "most advanced system, producing safer and more useful responses." Here's everything we know about it so far.

Read more
GPT-4 has come to LinkedIn, because of course it has
LinkedIn's GPT-4 headline generator feature.

With the official introduction of Open AI's GPT-4, Microsoft is expanding its range of product support to include AI upgrades embedded into LinkedIn.

The business-focused social media platform announced Thursday that it will begin testing a host of AI-driven features based on both the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 language models with its Premium subscribers. These functions will allow people to do things such as create more personalized profiles and job descriptions using AI-generated prompts. In particular, the GPT-4 language model will be the power behind AI profile writing, according to LinkedIn.

Read more