Skip to main content

NASA is hiding solar UFOs, claims YouTube user

Image used with permission by copyright holder

As space geeks will tell you, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory is a pretty neat tool for exploring our solar system. Created in 1995 as a joint effort from NASA and the European Space Agency, the Observatory’s role is to gather information about the sun. Pictures, activity data, radiation level readings; that sort of thing. To date SOHO has been pretty successful. Originally scheduled for a mere two year solar study, the Observatory is still staring at the sun, almost 17 years later.

However, this successful information gathering campaign has also generated its share of controversy. Not over the expense of the project or the ethical ramifications of widening our understanding of mankind’s role in the cosmos, but instead SOHO has lead a surprising number of people to believe that NASA is picking up images of aliens, then blatantly lying to the general public about them.

Recommended Videos

Below this text you will find a video created by YouTube user “rob19791.” In it he republishes images captured by SOHO on May 3, dramatically zooming in on a certain object in the picture that he claims is a UFO. NASA, in turn, claims that the object is the result of cosmic rays affecting its cameras.

Then, on May 4, the satellite that captured the images went offline. According to NASA, “SOHO went into ‘Emergency Sun Reacquisition’ mode on Friday May 4, 2012, caused by a false trigger of the Coarse Sun Pointing Attitude Anomaly Detector.” In other words, a glitch. The space agency claims to be working on a fix for the problem, but so far has no information on when this particular imaging system will be back up and running.

This is crucial, because it set off a firestorm of YouTube controversy. As you can see in the below video, rob19791 believes that NASA purposely took the cameras down to prevent mankind from seeing the truth about this Sol-obsessed UFO (or, at the very least, that it is trying to prevent us from noticing an apocalyptic solar flare that will kill us all). “NASA are clearly trying to stop us looking at the sun,” he writes. “The reasons could be anything from the crafts/ships seen recently or an impending solar flare that will wipe out humanity.”

It wouldn’t be fair for us to take sides in this conflict, so instead we leave it to you, dear reader: Who do you trust more? NASA, a multi-billion dollar space agency whose funding relies almost entirely on actually finding new and interesting things out there to study, or rob19791, some dude with a YouTube account?

Earnest Cavalli
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Earnest Cavalli has been writing about games, tech and digital culture since 2005 for outlets including Wired, Joystiq…
Mercedes bets solar paint is part of EV-charging future
mercedes solar paint evs benz electric camper

It’s been said that Albert Einstein’s genius came from his ability to freely wonder and ask child-like questions way before he even tried applying science-based solutions.
It seems some within the R&D department at Mercedes-Benz might be similarly inspired. The German automaker is currently developing a special solar paint that, when applied on the surface of vehicles, can harness enough energy from the sun to power up EVs.
The energy generated by the paint’s solar cells can be used for driving or fed directly into a high-voltage battery.
“The photovoltaic system is permanently active and also generates energy when the vehicle is switched off,” Mercedes says. “In the future, this could be a highly effective solution for increased electric range and fewer charging stops.”
The layer of paste to be applied on EVs is significantly thinner than a human hair, yet its photovoltaic cells are packed full of energy. Covering the surface of a mid-size SUV with the paint could produce enough energy for up to 7,456 miles per year under ideal conditions, Mercedes says.
This does imply being in geographic locations with plenty of sun hours during the day.
But even with less-than-ideal sun hours, the energy yielded can make a significant difference to EV charging. Mercedes says the solar-paint charge could provide 100% of needed energy for an average daily drive of 32 miles in sun-drenched Los Angeles. In much less sunny conditions -- such as around Mercedes’ headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany -- it would still yield enough energy for 62% of the distance.
An added bonus for environmentally-conscious drivers: Unlike some solar panels, the solar paint contains no rare earth or silicon – only non-toxic, readily available raw materials. It’s also easy to recycle and considerably cheaper to produce than conventional solar modules, Mercedes says.
The likes of Aptera, Sono Motors, Lightyear, and Hyundai have also been researching how to best harness solar energy to power up EVs.
But that’s been mostly through solar panels yielding enough energy for small and light vehicles, such as Aptera’s three-wheel solar EV. Solar paint could bring solar charging for bigger vehicles, such as electric SUVs, Mercedes says.

Read more
Volkswagen’s affordable ID.2 EV remains on track
vw id2 volkswagen affordable ev 1

It’s no secret that Volkswagen has been facing a huge slump in sales in Europe and China, forcing it to close plants in Germany.

But unlike other European automakers who have stuck to producing high-end electric vehicles (EVs), the German automaker keeps on reaffirming its commitment to bringing affordable EVs to market, including in the U.S.

Read more
Is a Jeep Cherokee replacement slated for 2025?
Jeep Cherokee

Jeep is remaining somewhat mysterious about the name of a new hybrid SUV slated to be part of the brand’s lineup in 2025.
Speaking at the Los Angeles Auto Show recently, Jeep CEO Antonio Filosa would only say that a new compact SUV with a hybrid powertrain was indeed on the way, according to Automotive News.
Filosa had already confirmed last spring that a new “mainstream” large SUV would soon be launched by Jeep, adding that we "could probably guess what it will be called." His comments had sparked speculation that the Cherokee brand name would be back.
While the brand name has existed since 1974, the Cherokee Nation in the U.S. had officially asked Jeep to stop using its name in 2021.
Early last year, Jeep quietly discontinued the model, which was one of its most iconic SUVs of the past 50 years.
The reason? Besides slumping sales, Jeep at the time cited the confluence of market dynamics, consumer preferences, and strategic brand realignment.
The Cherokee was viewed as a classic four-door SUV, known both for its reliability and its ability to suit both off-road and urban environments.
But with time, “consumer preferences have significantly shifted towards larger SUVs equipped with the latest technology and enhanced safety features,” Jeep said at the time. “This trend is accompanied by an increasing demand for environmentally friendly vehicles, steering the market towards hybrid and electric models.”
While no one knows for sure what the new SUV hybrid will be called, Jeep's parent company, Stellantis, is certainly doing everything it can to steer all its brands in the hybrid and electric direction.

Stellantis recently launched a new platform called STLA Frame that’s made for full-size trucks and SUVs. The platform is designed to deliver a driving range of up to 690 miles for extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs) and 500 miles for battery electric vehicles (BEVs).

Read more