Game Informer broke the news in its July issue that Halo 5 would be the first main entry in the series not to include split-screen co-op for the game’s campaign mode, which has been a popular feature since the original Halo: Combat Evolved in 2001. Apparently the decision to drop split-screen was at least in part to ensure that 60fps could be maintained throughout play. Executive producer Josh Holmes subsequently clarified in a statement on Halo Waypoint that co-op will in fact require an Xbox Live Gold subscription to play.
“That said,” Holmes added, “it is important to us that fans have the opportunity to play the full co-op campaign experience and we are doing this by providing a 14-day Xbox Live Gold trial with Halo 5: Guardians.”
During Halo 5‘s campaign, Master Chief is joined by the Blue Team. In single player, Master Chief’s teammates are controlled by AI, and can accept commands. In co-op, the squad members are controlled by players, each with their own unique loadout. At some point the perspective changes from Master Chief to Spartan Jameson Locke (the protagonist of Halo: Nightfall), who is accompanied by his own team, Fireteam Osiris.
As a child of the 80s and 90s, I have a deep fondness for split-screen gameplay, cooperative or competitive. First-person shooters have never been an especially strong genre for me, so Halo’s local co-op campaigns have always been a fun way to play alongside my much more skilled friends without feeling as guilty as I do when dragging the team down against online strangers. While the same could effectively be done online, it cuts out a whole swathe of casual players that might not buy the game for themselves. Moreover, there was something great about those lazy weekend afternoons spent on the couch with Halo, a good friend, and a steady supply of beer.
How do you feel? Is a high and steady frame rate worth the trade for local co-op?
