Skip to main content

Do I really want to watch sports on a 3D TV?

Sony 3D TV Party
Image used with permission by copyright holder

After all the mixed emotions surrounding the introduction of 3D TV and ESPN’s announcement to broadcast in the format, I’ve yet to cast my ballot on watching sports this way. Sure, I’ve spent the extra five bucks to see a Pixar movie or two (I saw Toy Story 3 but not Avatar in 3D – I know, those are some messed up priorities) but I’m a purist when it comes to watching sports. For instance, halftime shows are an interruption I barely tolerate. So when I heard that ESPN would be broadcasting in 3D this year, you could say I was skeptical.


But not so skeptical that I wouldn’t give it a shot. Sony had a viewing party for the 3D broadcast of the Oregon Ducks vs UCLA game, and as both a loyal U of O grad and a tech writer, I went. After taking in an entire game in three dimensions, here’s my breakdown of the pros and cons.


3D TV glassesGlasses.

I know, it’s the first thing everybody says when they complain about 3D – but they’ve got a point. They’re heavy, dark, and nobody looks cool in them. Also, if you lose the remote as often as I do, think about the challenge of keeping track of these. Not to mention keeping them safe. Got kids? A dog? Are you a human who sometimes spills on objects you shouldn’t? Then be prepared for extra caution when it comes to these suckers.


If I’m watching a game I care about (which to the chagrin of my friends and family, is far too many) there’s a lot of jumping up, getting closer to the screen, pacing nervously, the occasional lewd gesture…and 3D limits this. The glasses are battery-powered and connected with the TV, so changing your line of sight causes them to lose the signal, which can be disorienting. The simple solution is to push the glasses up when you look away, but then, obviously, the screen’s image will be completely skewed when you look back. For optimal viewing, you need to keep focused on the screen and sitting upright – tilting your head too much also causes the connection to be lost.

Should I watch the game or the 3D?

You watch Avatar for the stunning visual experience. You watch a game to see who wins. I found myself amazed by a pass Darren Thomas threw out of bounds because it came at the screen and seemingly, right at me. “So cool,” I thought. Wrong. Not cool. Incomplete passes are not cool. You start paying attention to ESPN’s added graphics and any action coming right at you – but paying less attention to the actual game. It also makes me question how it would translate to basketball, where you’re so much closer to the action and the game moves so much faster.


It’s probably worth it.

Do I want to watch every game in its entirety in 3D? No. Would I watch part of a game in 3D? Absolutely. It should go without saying that sports in HD are amazing – it’s like getting glasses after years of squinting to barely make out fuzzy objects. So when or if you’re upgrading TVs, it can be assumed you’re going HD, and I’d say it’s worth it to put in the extra money for the option of 3D. The Sony 46-inch Bravia HDTV is $1499.99, and its 3D version is $1,999.99.  So if you’re going to drop serious cash on upgrading your TV anyway, why not go for it?

It’s really cool.

There’s not a lot more to say than that. It is really fun to see your team in 3D, maybe not for two or three hours, but definitely for awhile. Sure it’s a novelty, but an enjoyable one. As much as anyone loves sports, there are plenty of instances in a game that aren’t action-packed, and 3D absolutely makes those moments a lot more fun.

Sports are theater.

I know I said I’m a purist, but I should probably get on board with sports as theater. There’s more fan involvement in the drama of players’ lives, people want more from game coverage, and broadcasters know this. TV isn’t just a functional tool for me to get the end score, and that’s certainly not the direction it’s going. At the Sony event, whenever I took my glasses off and watched on the HDTV, I wondered what I was missing out on. 3D TV might not enhance every aspect of the game, but sports will be broadcast to enhance 3D TV, so I might as well enjoy it.

Editors' Recommendations

Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
What is 8D audio, and how can you experience it?
woman wearing headphones

If you spend a lot of time on YouTube, you may have seen something called 8D Audio showing up in the Up Next column or in your recommended videos. 8D? As in eight-dimensional audio? Yes, it's a thing. But how can audio possess eight dimensions? How can our ears hear something in eight dimensions? And why do 8D videos always tell us to put our headphones on?

In short, what the heck is 8D audio, anyway? Give us a few minutes and we'll explore every dimension of 8D audio. Ear we go ...
How can audio have eight dimensions?
An illustration of the Millennium simulation, which uses supercomputers to formulate how the key components of the Universe would have evolved over cosmic time. Illustration: Springel et al. (2005); Spectrum: NASA/CXC/CfA/Kovács et al.

Read more
Apple’s AirPods Pro spatial audio turns your iPhone into a movie theater
Apple AirPods spatial audio

The personal audio world is full of technologies that attempt to do more with those small, head-worn speakers we call headphones and earbuds.

Some of these technologies, like so-called 8D Audio, are more gimmicks than real innovations. But Apple's spatial audio, which it launched with its iOS 14 and iPadOS 14 updates on September 16, is the real deal.

Read more
Why didn’t 3D movies and TV ever catch on?
An audience watches Avatar 3D in a theater on January 7, 2009

The 3D revolution started a little over a decade ago. It didn’t last long.

While television manufacturers like Samsung, LG, and Panasonic bet big on the technology -- and some top filmmakers, including James Cameron, made a convincing case for it in theaters -- it had a lifespan of just seven years. So what happened? Why did 3D fail to catch on?

Read more