Skip to main content

C’mon, Apple — if Sonos can admit it was wrong about Bluetooth, so can you

For years, Sonos has relentlessly championed the benefits of Wi-Fi audio. The company even ran a cheeky (and hilarious) campaign showing how annoying it can be to use Bluetooth, featuring pinging notifications and phone calls routinely interrupting what should have otherwise been enjoyable music-listening sessions. Times have changed, however, and not only has Sonos added Bluetooth to its two portable speakers (the Move and the Roam), but recent leaks suggest that it’s considering expanding support for Bluetooth into its main portfolio of powered speakers too, starting with the new Sonos Era 100 and Sonos Era 300.

This amounts to a tacit acknowledgment that Sonos may have been too zealous in its past refusal to adopt Bluetooth audio, and I can’t help but think that it might be time for another company to rethink its rejection of Bluetooth: Apple.

A lifestyle image of the Sonos Era 100, as leaked by The Verge.
An image of the Sonos Era 100, as leaked by The Verge. Image used with permission by copyright holder

I’m talking specifically about the HomePod (gen 1, 2) and HomePod mini. All three versions of Apple’s smart speaker possess Bluetooth 5.0 radios, and yet none is compatible with Bluetooth audio when streamed from a phone or other device. There are only two ways to get a HomePod to play music: you can ask Siri to access one of the compatible music services, or you can use AirPlay.

Recommended Videos

Don’t get me wrong, I fully agree with the quality advantages of Wi-Fi (and thus AirPlay) when it comes to wireless audio. Even though it’s possible to do lossless CD-quality sound over Bluetooth (assuming you have a source and speaker that are compatible with the newest version of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Sound), Wi-Fi can support up to 24-bit/192kHz lossless hi-res audio if you want, plus it’s the only way to do multiroom when you have multiple wireless speakers.

I also understand that Wi-Fi audio, with its app-based control architecture, gives companies like Apple and Sonos a much deeper connection to their customers’ listening habits. The Sonos app acts like an operating system of sorts. It’s superb in many ways (including its unrivaled universal search), and it just so happens to be the only way you can access Sonos Radio, the company’s in-house ad-supported or subscription-based streaming music service.

When you use a Sonos portable like the Move in Bluetooth mode, the Sonos app is entirely removed from the equation. And since the app is such a big part of the Sonos experience, you can see why the company would prefer to keep you on Wi-Fi whenever possible.

Handoff between Apple iPhone and Apple HomePod second-gen.
Apple

Apple’s approach is less app-centric — the HomePod family is controlled (partially) from the company’s Home app — but in some ways, it’s even more dependent on Wi-Fi. If a HomePod were to switch to Bluetooth mode for audio, it would cease to be available to Apple’s other products like the Apple TV, or any other AirPlay-capable Apple product in your home. More critically, from Apple’s point of view, the HomePod would cease to work as a smart speaker (voice assistants like Siri need a direct internet connection).

And yet, there’s just no denying that Bluetooth is way more convenient. There’s no app to install (or at the very least, if there is one, it’s optional), no Wi-Fi networks to join, and it lets you stream any audio your device can produce, from movies to phone calls. Plus, it’s inherently universal. If a friend wants to stream to your HomePod and their phone isn’t made by Apple, sorry, that just isn’t happening.

Apple has always prioritized its own ecosystem when it comes to its products, and I don’t expect that to change any time soon. But if Sonos — a company that has also jealously guarded its own ecosystem in the past — appears to be on the brink of allowing its customers to use their speakers over Bluetooth, I think Apple should too. No one has ever said, “I wish my Apple product could do less.”

Simon Cohen
Contributing Editor, A/V
Simon Cohen is a contributing editor to Digital Trends' Audio/Video section, where he obsesses over the latest wireless…
The Sonos Roam 2 is the sequel that doesn’t suck
The Sonos Roam 2 laying horizontal on a table.

In the wide world of consumer tech, there's one thing that's perhaps harder than constantly pushing the envelope to come up with the latest, greatest, most mind-blowing products time and time again, and that's knowing when to leave well enough alone.

In the case of the second generation of Sonos' smallest and least-expensive speaker, the $179 Sonos Roam 2 that was released at the end of May, the company has (thankfully) managed to keep its hands to itself with a sequel that's gotten a slightly refreshed look (and some new colors), a new dedicated Bluetooth button, and little else. And that's a good thing.

Read more
The best Sonos alternatives
Close up of Sonos logo on a Sonos Arc soundbar.

We have recommended Sonos wireless speakers and components for years. We still think the company makes a fantastic product. But the absolute fiasco caused by the May 7 Sonos app redesign broke almost every aspect of the Sonos experience -- and we’re still waiting for fixes that were promised weeks ago.

If you’re a Sonos owner, we share your frustration. If your investment in the company’s ecosystem is significant, your best bet is to wait and ride out this storm. Eventually things will return to normal and, hopefully, the Sonos experience will be better than before.

Read more
The new Beats Pill might replace Sonos on my back porch
The 2024 Beats Pill and an aging Sonos Play:1.

If I were to build an outdoor stereo in 2024, I'd do it with a pair of portable Beats Pills instead of Sonos speakers. Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

In 2017, after more than a decade in our home, my wife and I added a pool. With it came a covered deck, making what basically was a new outdoor room. Not uncommon at all in Florida, but new to us.

Read more