Skip to main content

Online dating works great, you’re just doing it wrong

online dating works great you're just doing it wrongEarlier this week, CNN Money writer JP Mangalindan posted a column lamenting how the online component of modern courtship has “ruined dating … forever.” The piece was circulated around DT and drew mostly criticism. But it deserves a response, and it’s fallen to me to muster one. 

I’m 37 years old and, as I’ve said, I’m no tech visionary. I detest Facebook and, were it not for a mild crush on Instagram, would not have posted to it for about six months. My Twitter feed is hardly active; I have no Pinterest in Tumblr; and I use LinkedIn only when I’m unemployed. DT, on the other hand, is staffed with a gaggle of plugged-in writers and editors in their late 20s. Many of them are single, and most of them have dated online or are actively doing it. Probably right now. While they should be working. 

Related Videos

So why am I the one responding to Mangalindan? I just got married two months ago to a woman I met online and you won’t meet a bigger proponent to online dating than me. 

I started three years ago, on the ass end of a 10-year relationship. To say I wasn’t entirely prepared to muscle all 5’5″ of myself into the fray at the local singles bar would be putting it mildly; and since my newfound singledom coincided with a move to a New York, I didn’t have a local singles bar – or a local anything, for that matter.

Dating online is just like shopping online: it’s crazy efficient.

That particular issue changed quickly once I started dating online. Every date was a chance to explore a new neighborhood, check out new bars and restaurants, and generally acclimate to a city that can otherwise be uniquely intimidating to a newcomer. I know this isn’t a term I should be associating with romance (digital or otherwise), but dating online is just like shopping online: it’s crazy efficient. Plenty of the dates went nowhere, but none of them were “bad” dates, because I had already enjoyed a back-and-forth online that made it easy to identify who might be fun to have a drink with. 

Mangalindan’s primary gripe is that dating online creates too many options, which make us overlook potentially great dates, and too much information, which ruins the natural process of discovery that those first few dates rely on to keep things interesting. Some of his anecdotal information came from a “twenty-something entrepreneur,” but your 20s are a time when mastery of technology comes swiftly while understanding of its nuances often lags behind. 

The young man complained that so much information about a potential date was available on Facebook – “her favorite bands, movies, TV shows, and recent vacation photos” – that he was convinced they’d have nothing to talk about because he knew “all the answers to all the questions I would ask her during coffee.”

Maybe the problem isn’t the online context in which we all now date, but the young man’s lack of subtlety in navigating that context. If you don’t want to know everything about your coffee date … don’t look?

Mangalindan (who, according to his Facebook profile, recently turned 30) goes on to complain that the catalog-like experience of online dating sites “enable a downright Seinfeld-ian level of superficial nitpicking.” This may be true, but rather than blame online dating maybe he should just … not nitpick so much? 

online dating works great you're just doing it wrongUltimately, it all boils down to the larger issue of what it is we’re going to do with all this technology, now that we have it. The Internet hasn’t ruined dating anymore than email ruined writing or YouTube ruined television. If you find the former impersonal, you can still send a proper letter. If you find the latter infuriating, you don’t have to watch Jenna Marbles. And if you don’t like how you’re dating experience has gone online, then go about it differently. After all, the Internet ain’t going away, and singles bars have always kinda sucked. 

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I should probably update my relationship status on Facebook … 

Images courtesy of Shutterstock/Everett Collection

Editors' Recommendations

How to use Amazon’s Alexa app on your smartphone
amazon-alexa-on-android feature image

Amazon Alexa is one of the most popular smart assistants available. With support for a wide range of devices and the ability to check the news, give a quick update on your favorite sports team, or perform hundreds of other tasks, it's an incredibly useful piece of software. But it’s the support for smart home products that really makes Alexa compelling, as it can quickly send commands to most devices and gives you remote access to all your gadgets.

Here, we take a look at how to use the Alexa app on any smartphone, along with tips on how to make the most of all its features.
How to configure Alexa on Android or iPhone

Read more
Forget Philips Hue: Get a TP-Link smart bulb bundle for $40 today
tp link color changing smart bulb 2

A smart bulb is a great way to easily set the mood in any room. Unfortunately, they usually cost more money than you'd ever consider spending on a lightbulb, even with discounts like Philip Hue deals. We have an alternative to propose: The TP-Link Kasa A19 smart bulb. You can get a pack of five for only $40 at Best Buy right now. That's enough to cover a few rooms with fun ambient light. Check out more things you can do with them below.

Why you should buy the TP-Link Kasa A19 smart bulb bundle
The TP-Link Kasa A19 smart bulb is easy to set up -- you just have to insert them into your bulb socket and connect it directly to your home's Wi-Fi network, with no extra equipment needed. Once that's done, you'll just have to follow the instructions on the Kasa Smart app, which you'll also be using to control the smart bulb, including selecting your choice among 16 million colors and dimming its brightness to create the perfect atmosphere. Since you'll be operating the smart bulb through the app, you'll be able to make the changes from wherever you are, even when you're miles away from your home.

Read more
Blink Mini Pan-Tilt Mount vs. Wyze Cam Pan v3: which is best?
is the blink mini pan tilt mount worth it wyze

When it comes to affordable indoor cameras, the Blink Mini Pan-Tilt Mount and the Wyze Cam Pan v3 are at the top of the class. Both offer high-quality footage, along with a bevy of other useful features that make them stand out in a crowded market. The Blink Mini Pan-Tilt Mount is a bit more expensive (it costs $60, compared to $34 for the Wyze Pan v3), but which one is better for your smart home? Here’s a comprehensive look at the Wyze Pan v3 and Blink Mini Pan-Tilt Mount to help you decide.
Video quality

Both the Wyze Pan v3 and Blink Mini Pan-Tilt Mount capture 1080p footage. They also both work in the dark, with Blink featuring infrared night vision and Wyze using color night vision, which allows them to function around the clock. Both look great when viewed on your smartphone, and it’s hard to go wrong with either if you’re worried about video quality.

Read more